Strategic tradeoffs for wildlife-friendly eco-labels

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 491-498

  Treves, Adrian ^a   Jones, Stephanie Michelle ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b Center for Applied Biodiversity Science   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CERTIFICATION; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; ECOLABELING; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; HUMAN ACTIVITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TRADE-OFF; WILD POPULATION; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 78650039565     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/080173     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams LG, Stephenson RO, Dale BW, et al. 2008. Population dynamics and harvest characteristics of wolves in the Central Brooks Range, Alaska. Wildlife Monogr 170: 1-25.
2. Alcock J. 1999. Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
3. Aquino HL and Falk CL. 2001. A case study in the marketing of "wolf-friendly" beef. Rev Agric Econ 23: 524-37.
4. Bartley T. 2003. Certifying forests and factories: States, social movements, and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest products fields. Polit Soc 31: 433-64.
5. Bulte EH and Rondeau D. 2005. Why compensating wildlife damages may be bad for conservation. J Wildlife Manage 69: 14-19.
6. Certified Wildlife Friendly. 2009. www.wildlifefriendly.org. Viewed 27 Feb 2009.
7. Dolphin Safe. 2009. www.earthisland.org/dolphinSafeTuna/ consumer. Viewed 27 Feb 2009.
8. Dunwoody S. 2007. The challenge of trying to make a difference using media messages. In: Moser SC and Dilling L (Eds). Creating a climate for change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Endangered Species Chocolate. 2009. www.chocolatebar.com. Viewed 27 Feb 2009.
10. Estes JA, Tinker MT, Williams TM, et al. 1998. Killer whale predation on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems. Science 282: 473-76.
11. Ferraro PJ and Kiss A. 2002. Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298: 1718-19.
12. Fischer J, Brosi B, Daily GC, et al. 2008. Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front Ecol Environ 6: 380-85.
13. Fishwise. 2009. www.fishwise.org. Viewed 27 Feb 2009.
14. Groves C. 2003. Drafting a blueprint for conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
15. Guthman J. 1998. Regulating meaning, appropriating nature: The codification of California organic agriculture. Antipode 30: 135-54.
16. Holsman RH. 2000. Goodwill hunting? Exploring the role of hunters as ecosystem stewards. Wildlife Soc Bull 28: 808-16.
17. International Marine Mammal Project. 2009. www.earthisland. org/immp. Viewed 27 Feb 2009.
18. Jackson JJ. 1996. An international perspective on hunting. In: Leader-Williams N, Kayera JA, and Overton GL (Eds). Tourist hunting in Tanzania. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN. Occasional Publication 14.
19. Long RA, Donovan TM, Mackay P, et al. 2007. Comparing scat detection dogs, cameras, and hair snares for surveying carnivores. J Wildlife Manage 71: 2018-25.
20. Loveridge AJ, Reynolds JC, and Milner-Gulland EJ. 2007. Does sport hunting benefit conservation? In: Macdonald DW and Service K (Eds). Key topics in conservation biology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21. Mishra C, Allen P, McCarthy T, et al. 2003. The role of incentive schemes in conserving the snow leopard, Uncia uncia. Conserv Biol 17: 1512-20.
22. Naughton L and Sanderson S. 1996. Property, politics and wildlife conservation. World Dev 23: 1265-75.
23. Naughton-Treves L, Grossberg R, and Treves A. 2003. Paying for tolerance: The impact of livestock depredation and compensation payments on rural citizens' attitudes toward wolves. Conserv Biol 17: 1500-11.
24. Oosterhouis F, Rubik F, and Scholl G. 2005. Product policy in Europe: New environmental perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Ottman JA, Stafford ER, and Hartman CL. 2006. Avoiding green marketing myopia: Ways to improve consumer appeal for environmentally preferable products. Environment 48: 22-36.
26. Peterson MN. 2004. An approach for demonstrating the social legitimacy of hunting. Wildlife Soc Bull 32: 310-21.
27. Predator Friendly. 2009. www.predatorfriendly.org. Viewed 27 Feb 2009.
28. Roberge J-M and Angelstam P. 2004. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conserv Biol 18: 76-85.
29. Robinson HS, Wielgus RB, Cooley HS, et al. 2008. Sink populations in carnivore management: Cougar demography and immigration in a hunted population. Ecol Appl 18: 1028-37.
30. Rooney T and Anderson D. 2009. Are wolf-mediated trophic cascades boosting biodiversity in the Great Lakes region? In: Wydeven AP, Van Deelen TR, and Heske EH (Eds). Recovery of gray wolves in the Great Lakes region of the United States: An endangered species success story. New York, NY: Springer.
31. Salafsky N and Margoluis R. 2003. What conservation can learn from other fields about monitoring and evaluation. BioScience 53: 120-21.
32. Salafsky N, Salzer D, Stattersfield AJ, et al. 2008. A standard lexicon for biodiversity conservation: Unified classifications of threats and actions. Conserv Biol 22: 897-911.
33. Salmon Safe. 2009. www.salmonsafe.org. Viewed 27 Feb 2009.
34. Schwerdtner K and Gruber B. 2007. A conceptual framework for damage compensation schemes. Biol Conserv 134: 354-60.
35. Searle R, Colby S, and Milway KS. 2004. Moving eco-certification mainstream. Boston, MA: The Bridgespan Group.
36. Terborgh J, Lopez L, Nunez P, et al. 2002. Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294: 1923.
37. Tiger Friendly. 2009. http://go.worldbank.org/JINLEXEIS0. Viewed 28 Aug 2009.
38. Treves A. 2008. Beyond recovery: Wisconsin's wolf policy 1980-2008. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 13: 329-38.
39. Treves A, Wallace RB, and White S. 2009. Participatory planning of interventions to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts. Conserv Biol doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01242.x.
40. van Amstel M, Brauw CD, Driessen P, et al. 2007a. The reliability of product-specific eco-labels as an agrobiodiversity management instrument. Biodivers Conserv 16: 4109-29.
41. van Amstel M, Neve WD, Kraker JD, et al. 2007b. Assessment of the potential of ecolabels to promote agrobiodiversity. Ambio 36: 551-58.
42. van Schaik CP and Griffiths M. 1996. Activity patterns of Indonesian rain forest mammals. Biotropica 28: 105-12.
43. VeriFlora. 2009. www.veriflora.com. Viewed 27 Feb 2009.
44. Vucetich JA and Peterson RO. 2009. Wolf and moose dynamics on Isle Royale. In: Wydeven AP, Van Deelen TR, and Heske EH (Eds). Recovery of gray wolves in the Great Lakes region of the United States: An endangered species success story. New York, NY: Springer.
45. Woodroffe R and Frank LG. 2005. Lethal control of African lions (Panthera leo): Local and regional population impacts. Anim Conserv 8: 91-98.
46. Woodroffe R and Ginsburg JR. 1998. Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280: 2126-28.
47. Zabel A and Holm-Muller K. 2008. Conservation performance payments for carnivore conservation in Sweden. Conserv Biol 22: 247-51.