Objective grading of the pivot shift phenomenon using a support vector machine approach

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-5

  Labbe, David R ^a,b   de Guise, Jacques A ^a,b   Mezghani, Neila ^a   Godbout, Véronique ^c   Grimard, Guy ^d   Baillargeon, David ^e   Lavigne, Patrick ^f   Fernandes, Julio ^g   Ranger, Pierre ^g   Hagemeister, Nicola ^a,b  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPÉRIEURE   (Canada)

^c NOTRE DAME HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^e Hôpital de la Cité de la Santé   (Canada)

^f MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^g HÔPITAL DU SACRÉ COEUR DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

ACL rupture; Classification; Knee joint instability; Objective grading; Pivot shift; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); GRADING; KINEMATICS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

ACL RUPTURE; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; KNEE JOINT; KNEE JOINT KINEMATICS; LONG-TERM OUTCOME; ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS; PIVOT SHIFT; PIVOT SHIFT TESTS;

JOINTS (ANATOMY);

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTION TEST; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; KINEMATICS; KNEE INSTABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PIVOT SHIFT TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

EID: 78650023339     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.012     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Amis A.A., Cuomo P., et al. Measurement of knee laxity and pivot-shift kinematics with magnetic sensors. Oper. Tech. Orthop. 2008, 18(3):8.
2. Andriacchi T.P., Briant P.L., et al. Rotational changes at the knee after ACL injury cause cartilage thinning. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2006, 442:39-44.
3. Bull A.M., Earnshaw P.H., et al. Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2002, 84(7):1075-1081.
4. Bull A.M.J., Amis A.A. The pivot-shift phenomenon: a clinical and biomechanical perspective. The Knee 1998, 5(3):141-158.
5. Burges C.J.C. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Discovery 1998, 2:121-167.
6. Chan, Y.Y., Fong, D.T., et al., 2010. Identification of ankle sprain motion from common sporting activities by dorsal foot kinematics data. J. Biomech. 43 (10), 1965-1969.
7. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol. Bull. 1968, 70(4):213-220.
8. Duda R.O., Hart P.E., et al. Pattern Classification 2001, Wiley, New York.
9. Eastlack M.E., Axe M.J., et al. Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1999, 31(2):210-215.
10. Engstrom B., Gornitzka J., et al. Knee function after anterior cruciate ligament ruptures treated conservatively. Int. Orthop. 1993, 17(4):208-213.
11. Fleiss J.L. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull. 1971, 76(5):378-382.
12. Fleiss J.L., Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1973, 33:613-619.
13. Galway H.R., MacIntosh D.L. The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1980, 147:45-50.
14. Giansanti D., Macellari V., et al. New neural network classifier of fall-risk based on the Mahalanobis distance and kinematic parameters assessed by a wearable device. Physiol. Meas. 2008, 29(3):N11-9.
15. Grood E.S., Suntay W.J. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J. Biomech. Eng. 1983, 105(2):136-144.
16. Hagemeister N., Parent G., et al. A reproducible method for studying three-dimensional knee kinematics. J. Biomech. 2005, 38(9):1926-1931.
17. Hefti E., Müller W., et al. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 1993, 1(3):226-234.
18. Hoshino Y., Kuroda R., et al. In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device. Am. J. Sports Med. 2007, 35(7):1098-1104.
19. Ishibashi Y., Tsuda E., et al. Navigation evaluation of the pivot-shift phenomenon during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the posterolateral bundle more important?. Arthroscopy 2009, 25(5):488-495.
20. Jonsson H., Riklund-Ahlstrom K., et al. Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5-9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop. Scand. 2004, 75(5):594-599.
21. Kaplan N., Wickiewicz T.L., et al. Primary surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A long-term follow-up study. Am. J. Sports Med. 1990, 18(4):354-358.
22. Kocher M.S., Steadman J.R., et al. Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am. J. Sports Med. 2004, 32(3):629-634.
23. Kubo S., Muratsu H., et al. Reliability and usefulness of a new in vivo measurement system of the pivot shift. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007, 454:54-58.
24. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33(1):159-174.
25. Labbe, D.R., et al., Feature selection using a principal component analysis of the kinematics of the pivot shift phenomenon. Journal of Biomechanics, in press, doi:. http://10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.011.
26. Lane C.G., Warren R., et al. The pivot shift. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2008, 16(12):679-688.
27. Lane, C.G., Warren, R.F., et al., 2008b. In vivo analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon during computer navigated ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 16 (5), 487-492.
28. Lau H.Y., Tong K.Y., et al. Support vector machine for classification of walking conditions of persons after stroke with dropped foot. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2009, 28(4):504-514.
29. Lauer R.T., Smith B.T., et al. Application of a neuro-fuzzy network for gait event detection using electromyography in the child with cerebral palsy. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 52(9):1532-1540.
30. Leitze Z., Losee R.E., et al. Implications of the pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005, 436:229-236.
31. Lephart S.M., Perrin D.H., et al. Relationship between selected physical characteristics and functional capacity in the anterior cruciate ligament-insufficient athlete. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1992, 16(4):174-181.
32. Lopomo, N., Zaffagnini, S., et al., 2009. Pivot-shift test: analysis and quantification of knee laxity parameters using a navigation system. J. Orthop. Res. 28 (2), 164-169.
33. Noyes F.R., Grood E.S., et al. An analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon. The knee motions and subluxations induced by different examiners. Am. J. Sports Med. 1991, 19(2):148-155.
34. Phelps C.E., Hutson A. Estimating diagnostic test accuracy using a "fuzzy gold standard". Med. Decision Making 1995, 15(1):44-57.
35. Pollet V., Barrat D., et al. The role of the Rolimeter in quantifying knee instability compared to the functional outcome of ACL-reconstructed versus conservatively-treated knees. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2005, 13(1):12-18.
36. Schuster A.J., McNicholas M.J., et al. A new mechanical testing device for measuring anteroposterior knee laxity. Am. J. Sports Med. 2004, 32(7):1731-1735.
37. Torg J.S., Conrad W., et al. Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete. Am. J. Sports Med. 1976, 4(2):84-93.
38. Turek S. The Knee. Orthopedics-Principles and their Application 1984, JB Lippincott Co., Philadelphia, 1292 pp.