Feature selection using a principal component analysis of the kinematics of the pivot shift phenomenon

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 43, Issue 16, 2010, Pages 3080-3084

  Labbe, David R ^a,b   de Guise, Jacques A ^a,b   Mezghani, Neila ^a   Godbout, Véronique ^c   Grimard, Guy ^d   Baillargeon, David ^e   Lavigne, Patrick ^f   Fernandes, Julio ^g   Ranger, Pierre ^g   Hagemeister, Nicola ^a,b  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPÉRIEURE   (Canada)

^c NOTRE DAME HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^e Hôpital de la Cité de la Santé   (Canada)

^f MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^g HÔPITAL DU SACRÉ COEUR DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

ACL rupture; Feature selection; Knee joint instability; Pivot shift; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

FEATURE EXTRACTION; JOINTS (ANATOMY); KINEMATICS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

ACL RUPTURE; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ELECTROMAGNETIC SENSORS; FIRST PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE JOINT KINEMATICS; PIVOT SHIFT; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ABDUCTION; ACCELERATION; ADDUCTION; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RUPTURE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTRONIC SENSOR; HUMAN; JOINT INSTABILITY; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; KNEE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION;

EID: 78549264753     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Amis A.A., Cuomo P., et al. Measurement of knee laxity and pivot-shift kinematics with magnetic sensors. Oper. Tech. Orthop. 2008, 18(3):8.
2. Bull A.M., Earnshaw P.H., et al. Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2002, 84(7):1075-1081.
3. Bull A.M.J., Amis A.A. The pivot-shift phenomenon: a clinical and biomechanical perspective. The Knee 1998, 5(3):141-158.
4. Cattell R.B., Vogelmann S. A comprehensive trial of the scree and KG criteria for determining the number of factors. Multivar. Behav. Res. 1977, 12(3):289-325.
5. Deluzio K.J., Astephen J.L. Biomechanical features of gait waveform data associated with knee osteoarthritis: an application of principal component analysis. Gait Posture 2007, 25(1):86-93.
6. Deluzio K.J., Wyss U.P., et al. Gait assessment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients: principal component modeling of gait waveforms and clinical status. Hum. Movement Sci. 1999, 18:701-711.
7. Deluzio K.J., Wyss U.P., et al. Principal component models knee kinematics and kinetics: normal vs. pathological gait patterns. Hum. Movement Sci. 1997, 16:201-217.
8. Grood E.S., Suntay W.J. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J. Biomech. Eng. 1983, 105(2):136-144.
9. Hagemeister N., Parent G., et al. A reproducible method for studying three-dimensional knee kinematics. J. Biomech. 2005, 38(9):1926-1931.
10. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., et al. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings 1998, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
11. Ho R. Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis and Interpretation with SPSS 2006, Chapman and Hall/CRC.
12. Hoshino Y., Kuroda R., et al. In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device. Am. J. Sports Med. 2007, 35(7):1098-1104.
13. Jones L., Holt C.A., et al. Reduction, classification and ranking of motion analysis data: an application to osteoarthritic and normal knee function data. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 11(1):31-40.
14. Kaiser H.F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1958, 23:187-200.
15. Kocher M.S., Steadman J.R., et al. Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am. J. Sports Med. 2004, 32(3):629-634.
16. Kubo S., Muratsu H., et al. Reliability and usefulness of a new invivo measurement system of the pivot shift. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007, 454:54-58.
17. Labbe, D.R., de Guise J.A., et al., 2010. Accounting for velocity of the pivot shift test manoeuvre decreases kinematic variability. Knee. In press, doi:10.1016/j.knee.2010.03.008.
18. Landry S.C., McKean K.A., et al. Neuromuscular and lower limb biomechanical differences exist between male and female elite adolescent soccer players during an unanticipated side-cut maneuver. Am. J. Sports Med. 2007, 35(11):1888-1900.
19. Lane C.G., Warren R., et al. The pivot shift. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2008, 16(12):679-688.
20. Lane, C.G., Warren R.F., et al., 2008b. In vivo analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon during computer navigated ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
21. Lee M., Roan M., et al. An application of principal component analysis for lower body kinematics between loaded and unloaded walking. J. Biomech. 2009, 42(14):2226-2230.
22. Leitze Z., Losee R.E., et al. Implications of the pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005, 436:229-236.
23. Lopomo N., Zaffagnini S., et al. Pivot-shift test: Analysis and quantification of knee laxity parameters using a navigation system. J. Orthop. Res. 2009.
24. Matsumoto H. Mechanism of the pivot shift. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1990, 72(5):816-821.
25. O'Connor K.M., Bottum M.C. Differences in cutting knee mechanics based on principal components analysis. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2009, 41(4):867-878.
26. Olney S.J., Griffin M.P., et al. Multivariate examination of data from gait analysis of persons with stroke. Phys. Ther. 1998, 78(8):814-828.
27. Rencher A.C. Methods of Multivariate Analysis 2002, Wiley.