Cone beam computed tomography as a method of quantitative and qualitative analysis of alveolar crest in the frontal mandibular area

Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 713-717

  Georgescu, Carmen Elena ^a   Mihai, A ^a   Didilescu, Andreea Cristina ^a   Moraru, Ruxandra ^a   Nimigean, V ^a   Nimigean, Vanda Roxana ^a   Tǎnase, Gabriela ^a  

^a CAROL DAVILA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY   (Romania)

Author keywords

Bone density; Mandible anatomy; Quantitative analyses; Tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BONE DENSITY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649980409     PISSN: 12200522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. FREDERIKSEN NL, Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,1995, 80(5):540-554.
2. FROMMER HH, STABULAS-SAVAGE JJ, Advanced imaging systems. In: PENNY R (ed), Radiology for the dental professional, 8th edition, Mosby, St. Louis, 2005, 330-341.
3. WHITE SC, PHAROAH MJ, Specialized radiographic techniques. In: Penny R (ed), Oral radiology. Principles and interpretation, 4th edition, Mosby, St. Louis, 2000, 217-240.
4. ANIL S, AL-GHAMDI HS, A method of gauging dental radiographs during treatment planning for dental implants, J Contemp Dent Pract, 2007, 8(6):82-88.
5. DAWOOD A, PATEL S, BROWN J, Cone beam CT in dental practice, Br Dent J, 2009, 207(1):23-28.
6. KALENDER WA, Principles of computed tomography. In: KALENDER WA (ed), Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications, 2nd edition, Publicis Corporate Publishing, Erlangen, 2005, 17-35.
7. SEERAM E, Computed tomography - an overview. In: SEERAM E (ed), Computed tomography: physical principles, clinical applications and quality control, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1994, 1-17.
8. HORNER K, ISLAM M, FLYGARE L, TSIKLAKIS K, WHAITES E, Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2009, 38(4):187-195.
9. MIRACLE AC, MUKHERJI SK, Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 2: clinical applications, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2009, 30(7):1285-1292.
10. WHITE SC, Cone-beam imaging in dentistry, Health Phys, 2008, 95(5):628-637.
11. TODD AD, GHER ME, QUINTERO G, RICHARDSON AC, Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites, J Periodontol, 1993, 64(12):1243-1249.
12. HAURET L, HODEZ C, A new modality for dentomaxillofacial imaging: cone beam CT, J Radiol, 2009, 90(5 Pt 2):604-617.
13. GARG AK, VICARI A, Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry, Implant Soc, 1995, 5(5):7-11.
14. BOUSERHAL C, JACOBS R, QUIRYNEN M, VAN STEENBERGHE D, Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2002, 4(3):156-172.
15. TAL H, MOSES O, A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 1991, 20(1):40-42.
16. HANSSENS JF, Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?, Rev Belge Med Dent, 1996, 51(2):101-110.
17. ARZOUMAN MJ, OTIS L, KIPNIS V, LEVINE D, Observations of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar canal, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1993, 8(3):295-300.
18. ROUAS P, NANCY J, BAR D, Identification of double mandibular canals: literature review and three case reports with CT scans and cone beam CT, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2007, 36(1):34-38.
19. MISCH CE, CRAWFORD EA, Predictable mandibular nerve location - a clinical zone of safety, Dent Today, 1990, 9(9):32-35.
20. NORTJÉ CJ, FARMAN AG, GROTEPASS FW, Variation in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients, Br J Oral Surg, 1977, 15(1):55-63.
21. ANGELOPOULOS C, THOMAS SL, HECHLER S, PARISSIS N, HLAVACEK M, Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008, 66(10):2130-2135.
22. MRAIWA N, JACOBS R, VAN STEENBERGHE D, QUIRYNEN M, Clinical assessment and surgical implications of anatomic challenges in the anterior mandible, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2003, 5(4):219-225.
23. TURKYILMAZ I, TÖZÜM TF, TUMER C, Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography, J Oral Rehabil, 2007, 34(11):267-272.
24. SHAPURIAN T, DAMOULIS PD, REISER GM, GRIFFIN TJ, RAND WM, Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2006, 21(2):290-297.