Impact evaluation of the voluntary early retirement policy on research and technology outputs of the faculties of science in Morocco

Scientometrics

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 125-132

  Bouabid, Hamid ^a,b   Dalimi, Mohamed ^a   ElMajid, Zayer ^a  

^a Directorate of Technology   (Morocco)

^b IBN TOFAIL UNIVERSITY   (Morocco)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Metrics; Morocco; Public policy; Research and technology outputs

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649975671     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0271-z     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44-60.
2. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2005). Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 65(3), 391-392.
3. Bouabid, H., & Martin, B. R. (2009). Evaluation of Moroccan research using a bibliometric-based approach: Investigation of the validity of the h-index. Scientometrics, 78(2), 203-217.
4. Bourke, P., & Butler, L. (1998). Institutions and the map of science: Matching university departments and fields of research. Research Policy, 26(6), 711-718.
5. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2007). The scientific productivity of academic inventors: New evidence from Italian data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 101-118.
6. Charlton, B. G., & Andras, P. (2007). Evaluating universities using simple scientometric research-output metrics: Total citation counts per university for a retrospective seven-year rolling sample. Science and Public Policy, 34(8), 555-563.
7. Csajbok, E., Berhidi, A., Vasas, L., & Schubert, A. (2007). Hirsch-index for countries based on essential science indicators data. Scientometrics, 73(1), 91-117.
8. Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W., & Hussinger, K. (2007). Patent and publication activities of German professors: An empirical assessment of their co-activity. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 311-319.
9. Glänzel, W. (2006). On the h-index-A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67(2), 315-321.
10. Granadino, B., Plaza, L. M., & Vidal, C. (2005). Analysis of Spanish scientific output following the joint action program (Acciones Integradas) of the Ministry of Science and Technology (MCYT). Research Evaluation, 14(2), 97-102.
11. Hicks, D., Tomizawa, H., Saitoh, Y., & Kobayashi, S. (2004). Bibliometric techniques in the evaluation of federally funded research in the USA. Research Evaluation, 13(2), 68-78.
12. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(26), 16569-16572.
13. Jimenez-Contreras, E., Anegon, F. D., & Lopez-Cozar, E. D. (2003). The evolution of research activity in Spain-The impact of the National Commission for the Evaluation of Research Activity (CNEAI). Research Policy, 32(1), 123-142.
14. Katz, J. S. (2000). Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 27(1), 23-36.
15. Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy, 12, 65-69.
16. Meyer, M. (2006). Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their noninventing peers in nano-science and technology. Research Policy, 35(10), 1646-1662.
17. Narin, F. (1987). Bibliometric techniques in the evaluation of research programs. Science and Public Policy, 14(2), 104-106.
18. Rosenberg, N. (1998). Chemical engineering as a general purpose technology. In E. Helpman (Ed.), General purpose technologies and economic growth (pp. 167-192). Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. The World Bank. (2006). MENA Regional Governance Case Study: Morocco Voluntary Retirement Program.
20. Vanclay, J. K. (2006). On the robustness of h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1547-1550.
21. van Leeuwen, T. N., van der Wurff, L. J., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). The use of combined bibliometric methods in research funding policy. Research Evaluation, 10(3), 195-201.
22. van Looy, B., Callaert, J., & Debackere, K. (2006). Publication and patent behaviour of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy, 35(4), 596-609.
23. van Raan, A. F. J. (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3), 491-502.
24. Ventura, O. N., & Mombru, A. W. (2006). Use of bibliometric information to assist research policy making. A comparison of publication and citation profiles of Full and Associate Professors at a School of Chemistry in Uruguay. Scientometrics, 69(2), 287-313.
25. Vilibic, I. (2009). Bibliometric analysis of the adriatic-related oceanography and meteorology publications. Geofizika, 26(2), 229-243.