Avaliação das propriedades pscicométricas da versão em Português do teste de Jebsen Taylor para adultos com hemiparesia leve;Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Jebsen-Taylor test for adultsm with mild hemiparesis

Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 377-381

  Ferreiro, Karina N ^a   dos Santos, Renata L ^a   Conforto, Adriana B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b HOSPITAL ISRAELITA ALBERT EINSTEIN   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Disability evaluation; Motor skills; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility of results; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY;

BRAZIL; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PSYCHOMETRICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 78649946820     PISSN: 14133555     EISSN: 18099246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552010005000018     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ministério da Saúde - Datasus [homepage na Internet]. Mortalidade - Brasil. Óbitos por ocorrência por sexo segundo causa CID-BR-10. Estatísticas vitais-mortalidade e nascidos vivos/ mortalidade geral/ abrangência geográfica: Brasil por região e unidade da Federação. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde - Datasus; c2008 [atualizada em 2008; acesso em 25 Jul 2008]. Disponível em: http//:www.datasus.gov.br/
2. Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Stason WB, Adams HP, Adelman AM, Alexander DN, et al. Clinical practice guideline number 16: post-stroke rehabilitation. Rockville: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Plicy and Research; 1995.
3. Desrosiers J, Malouin F, Richards C, Bourbonnais D, Rochette A, Bravo G. Comparison of changes in upper and lower extremity impairments and disabilities after stroke. Int J Rehabil Res. 2003;26(2):109-16.
4. Kwakkel GK, Kollen BJ, Van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181-6.
5. Alon G, Levitt AF, McCarthy PA. Functional electrical stimulation enhancement of upper extremity functional recovery during stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(3):207-15.
6. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969;50(6):311-9.
7. Bovend'Eerdt TJ, Dawes H, Johansen-Berg H, Wade DT. Evaluation of the modified Jebsen test of hand function and the University of Maryland arm questionnaire for stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(2):195-202.
8. Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey LL, Lojovich JM, Carey JR. Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2004;154(4):450-60.
9. Beekhuizen KS, Field-Fote EC. Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation: effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19(1):33-45.
10. Conforto AB, Cohen LG, dos Santos RL, Scaff M, Marie SK. Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function in chronic cortico-subcortical strokes. J Neurol. 2007;254(3):333-9.
11. Wu CW, Seo HJ, Cohen LG. Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(3):351-7.
12. Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu WH, Gerloff C, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 3):490-9.
13. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97:113.
14. Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol. 1995;24(2):61-3.
15. Lopez MN, Charter RA, Mostafavi B, Nibut LP, Smith WE. Psychometric properties of the folstein mini-mental state examination. Assessment. 2005;12(2):137-44.
16. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press; 1998.
17. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(13):297-334.
18. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW3rd, Taub E. The reliability of the wolf motor function for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82: 750-5.
19. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, Lin PH. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke. Age Ageing. 1998;27(2):107-13.
20. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(7): 1635-9.
21. Koski L, Lin JC, Wu AD, Winstein CJ. Reliability of intracortical and corticomotor excitability estimates obtained from the upper extremities in chronic stroke. Neurosci Res. 2007;58(1): 19-31.
22. Wittenberg GF, Chen R, Ishii K, Bushara KO, Eckloff S, Croarkin E, et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17(1):48-57.
23. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30(3): 586-92.
24. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier R, Hahn MG, Sahrmann SA, Edwards DF. Relationships between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability 3 months after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(3):401-8.
25. McDonnell M. Action research arm test. Aust J Physiother. 2008;54(3):220.
26. Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the actionresearch arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(1):78-90.