Sequential P3 effects in a Posner's spatial cueing paradigm: Trial-by-trial learning of the predictive value of the cue

Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 155-167

  Gómez, Carlos M ^a   Flores, Angélica ^a   Digiacomo, Marcia R ^a   Vázquez Marrufo, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

P3a; P3b; Predictive value; Sequential effects; Trial by trial learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349258201     PISSN: 00651400     EISSN: 00651400     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anllo-Vento L (1995) Shifting attention in visual space: the effects of peripheral cueing on brain cortical potentials. Int J Neurosci 80: 353-370.
2. Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108: 624-652.
3. Botvinick MM, Cohen JD, Carter CS (2004) Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulated cortex: An update. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 539-546.
4. Brunia CH, Van Boxtel GJ (2001) Wait and see. Int J Psychophysiol 43: 213-242.
5. Burle B, Allain S, Vidal F, Hasbrouck T (2005) Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control. Does conflict really matter? J Exp Psychol 31: 831-837.
6. Clark RE, Manns JR, Squire LR (2002) Classical conditioning, awareness,and brain systems. Trends Cogn Sci 6: 524-531.
7. Coull JT (1998) Neural correlates of attention and arousal: insights from electrophysiology, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology. Prog Neurobiol 55: 343-361.
8. Dien J, Spencer KM, Donchin E (2003) Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by principal component analysis. Cogn Brain Res 17: 637-650.
9. Digiacomo MR, Marco-Pallarés J, Flores A, Gómez CM (2008) Wavelet analysis of the EEG during the neurocognitive evaluation of invalidly cued targets. Brain Res 1234: 94-103.
10. Donchin E, Coles MGH (1988) Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav Brain Sci 11: 357-428.
11. Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E (1977) On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 14: 456-467.
12. Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E (1982) The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing. Biol Psychol 14: 1-52.
13. Eimer M (1993) Spatial cueing, sensory gating and selective response preparation: an ERP study on visuo-spatial orienting. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88: 408-420.
14. Escera C, Alho K, Winkler I, Näätänen R (1998) Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci 10: 590-604.
15. Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoormann J (1995) Event-related potential correlates of errors in reaction tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 44: 287-296.
16. Fan J, Kolster R, Ghajar J, Suh M, Knight RT, Sarkar R, McCandliss BD (2007) Response anticipation and response: an event-related potentials and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 27: 2272-2282.
17. Friedman D, Cycowicz YM, Gaeta H (2001) The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25: 355-373.
18. Fuster JM (2003) Cortex and Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
19. Fuster JM (2004) Upper processing stages of the perceptionaction cycle. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 143-145.
20. Gehring WJ, Gross B, Coles MGH, Meyer DE, Donchin E (1993) A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 4: 385-390.
21. Gómez CM, Marco J, Grau C (2003) Preparatory visuomotor cortical network of the contingent negative variation estimated by current density. Neuroimage 20: 216-224.
22. Gómez CM, Fernandez A, Maestu F, Amo C, Gonzalez-Rosa JJ, Vaquero E, Ortiz T (2004) Task-specific sensory and motor preparatory activation revealed by contingent magnetic variation. Cogn Brain Res 21: 59-68.
23. Gómez CM, Flores A, Ledesma A (2007) Fronto-parietal networks activation during the contigent negative variation period. Brain Res Bull 73: 40-47.
24. Gómez CM, Flores A, Digiacomo MR, Ledesma A, González-Rosa JJ (2008) P3a and P3b components associated to the neurocognitive evaluation of invalidly cued targets. Neurosci Lett 430: 181-185.
25. Gómez CM, Flores A, Digiacomo MR (2008) Increased brain activation during the processing of spatially invalidly cued targets. Open Neuroimag J 2: 106-113.
26. Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E (1992) Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. J Exp Psychol Gen 121: 480-506.
27. Harter M, Miller S, Price N, Lalonde M, Keyes A (1989) Neural processes involved in directing attention. J Cogn Neurosci 3: 223-237.
28. Holroyd CB, Coles MG (2002) The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 109: 679-709.
29. Hopfinger JB, Buonocore MH, Mangun GR (2000) The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nat Neurosci 3: 284-291.
30. Jongen EMM, Smulders FTY (2007) Sequence effects in a spatial cueing task: Endogenous orienting is sensitive to orienting in the preceding trial. Psychol Res 71: 516-523.
31. Kerns JG, Cohen JD, MacDonald AW 3rd, Cho RY, Stenger VA, Carter CS (2004) Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303: 1023-1026.
32. Mangun GR, Hillyard SA (1991) Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17: 1057-1074.
33. Notebaert W, Gevers W, Verbruggen F, Liefooghe B (2006) Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychon Bull Rev 13: 112-117.
34. Perchet C, Garcia-Larrea L (2000) Visuo-spatial attention and motor reaction in children: An electrophysiological study of the "Posner" paradigm. Psychophysiol 37: 231-241.
35. Perchet C, Revol O, Fourneret P, Mauguière F, Garcia-Larrea L (2001) Attention Shifts and anticipatory mechanisms in hyperactive children: An ERP study using the Posner paradigm. Biol Psychiat 50: 44-57.
36. Polich J (2007) Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 118: 2128-2148.
37. Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32: 3-25.
38. Stürmer B, Leuthold H, Soetens E, Schroter H, Sommer W (2002) Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28: 1345-1363.
39. Verleger R, Jaœkowski P, Wascher E (2005) Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. Journal of Psychophysiology 19: 165-181.
40. Wronka E, Kaiser J, and Coenen AM (2008) The auditory P3 from passive and active three-stimulus oddball paradigm. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 68: 362-372.
41. Vidal F, Burle B, Bonnet M, Grapperon J, Hasbroucq T (2003) Error negativity on correct trials: A reexamination of available data. Biol Psychol 64: 265-282.
42. Yu AJ, Dayan P (2005) Uncertainty, neuromodulation and attention. Neuron 46: 681-692.