Policy design for a multifunctional landscape

Regional Environmental Change

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 339-348

  Gren, Ing Marie ^a   Svensson, Lisa ^a   Carlsson, Magnus ^a   Bishop, Kevin ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Arable landscape; Market and non market goods; Policies; Second best incentive schemes

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649903892     PISSN: 14363798     EISSN: 1436378X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-009-0105-9     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ahlkrona M (2001) Växtnäringsstatus i Mässingsboån och Brunnsjön 1989/2000 [Nutrient conditions in River Mässingsbo and Lake Brunn]. Seminarier och examensarbeten Nr 37. Avdelningen för vattenvårdslära, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.
2. Anselin L, Bongiovanni R, Lowenberg-DeBoer J (2004) A spatial econometric approach to the economics of site-specific management in corn production. Am J Agric Econ 86(3): 675-687.
3. Antle J, Capalbo S, Mooney S, Edward E, Paustian K (2003) Spatial heterogeneity, contract design and the efficiency of carbon sequestration policies for agriculture. J Environ Econ Manage 46: 231-250.
4. Baskent E (1999) Controlling spatial structure of forested landscapes: a case study towards landscape management. Landscape Ecol 14(1): 83-97.
5. Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1988) The theory of environmental policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Brooke A, Kendrick D, Meeraus A (1998) Release 2. 25. GAMS. User guide. The Scientific Press, South San Francisco.
7. Byström O (1998) The nitrogen abatement cost in wetlands. Ecol Econ 26(3): 321-331.
8. Debarlin DL (1986) Agricultural production economics. Macmillan, New York.
9. Drake L (1992) The non-market value of the Swedish agricultural landscape. Eur Rev Agric Econ 19(3): 351-364.
10. Evans N, Gaskell P, Winter M (2003) Re-assessing agrarian policy and practice in local environmental management: the case of beef cattle. Land Use Policy 20: 231-242.
11. Gren I-M (1995) The value of investing in wetlands for nitrogen abatement. Eur Rev Agric Econ 22: 157-172.
12. Gren I-M (2004) Uniform or discriminating payments for environmental production on arable land under asymmetric information. Eur Rev Agric Econ 31(61): 61-76.
13. Gren I-M (2008) Mitigation and adaptation policies for stochastic water pollution: an application to the Baltic Sea. Ecol Econ 66(2-3): 337-347.
14. Haddock J, Tzanopoulos J, Mitchley J, Fraser R (2007) A method for evaluating alternative landscape management scenarios in relation to the biodiversity conservation of habitats. Ecol Econ 61(2-3): 277-283.
15. Hart R (2003) Dynamic pollution control-time lags and optimal restoration of marine ecosystems. Ecol Econ 47(1): 79-93.
16. Helfand G, Berck P, Maull T (2003) The theory of pollution policy. In: Mäler K-G, Vincent J (eds) Handbook of environmental economics, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 249-304.
17. Hultkrantz L (1992) National account of timber and forest resources in Sweden. Environ Resource Econ 3: 284-305.
18. Länsstyrelsen (1994) Hovran. En utredning om CW-området. [Hovran, an investigation of CW region]. Report 1994: 2, Länsstyrelsen i Dalarna, Miljövårdsenheten.
19. Mäler K-G (1974) Environmental economics: a theoretical inquiry. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
20. Newell R, Stavins R (2003) Cost heterogeneity and the potential savings from market-based policies. J Regul Econ 23(1): 43-59.
21. Nilsson F (2009a) Biodiversity on Swedish pastures: estimating biodiversity production costs. J Environ Manage 90(1): 131-143.
22. Nilsson F (2009b) Transaction costs and agri-environmental policy measures-are preferences influencing policy implementation? J Environ Plan Manage 52(6): 757-775.
23. Nilsson F, Hasund KP, Gren IM, Surry Y (2008) Multifunctional agriculture-what does the literature tell us? Int Rev Environ Res Econ 2(4): 281-319.
24. Organization for Economic Cooperation, Development (OECD) (2001) Multifunctionality: toward an analytical framework. OECD, Paris.
25. Randall A (2002) Valuing the outputs from multifunctional agriculture. Eur Rev Agric Econ 29(3): 289-307.
26. Schläpfer F, Hanley N (2003) Demand for public landscape management services: a collective choice based evidence from Swiss cantons. J Environ Econ Manage 26: 88-109.
27. Söderqvist T, Scharin H (2000) The regional willingness to pay for a reduced eutrophication in the Stockholm Archipelago. Beijer Discussion paper no. 128. Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm.
28. Soutukorva Å (2001) A random utility model of recreation in the Stockholm Archipelago. Discussion paper no. 135. Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm.
29. Sterner T (2003) Policy instruments for environmental and natural resources. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
30. Sundberg S, Söderqvist T (2004) A survey of Swedish environmental valuation studies. Occasional paper series. Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm.
31. Svensson L (2002) Wetlands in a landscape framework: a case study of Hovran in Dalarna. Thesis, Department of Economics, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.
32. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) (2003) Environmental policy instruments in Sweden-a review [in Swedish]. Available at http://www. naturvardsverket. se/Documents/publikationer/620-5333-7. pdf. Accessed 17 March 2009.
33. Turner RK, Paavola J, Cooper P, Farber S, Jessamy V, Stavros G (2003) Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecol Econ 46: 493-510.
34. Vatn A (2002) Multifunctional agriculture: some consequences for international trade regimes. Eur Rev Agric Econ 29(3): 309-327.
35. Willgoose G (2005) Mathematical modelling of whole landscape evolution. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33: 443-459.
36. Xepapadeas A (1997) Advanced principles in environmental policy. Edward Elgar, UK.