Valuing the outputs of multifunctional agriculture

European Review of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 289-307

  Randall, Alan ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental amenities from agriculture; Green payments; Nonmarket valuation; Targeting; Trade environment interactions; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036335787     PISSN: 01651587     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurrag/29.3.289     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M. and Louviere, J. (1998). Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80: 64-75.
2. Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J. and Williams, M. (1994). Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 271-292.
3. Bartik, T. (1987). The estimation of demand parameters in hedonic price models. Journal of Political Economy 95: 81-88.
4. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bennett, J. and Blarney, R. (eds) (2001). The Choice Modeling Approach to Environmental Valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
6. Bergstrom, J. C. and DeCivita, P. (1999). Status of benefit transfer in the United States and Canada: a review. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 47(1): 79-87.
7. Blandford, D. and Boisvert, R. 2002. Non-trade concerns and domestic/international policy choice. Working Paper 02-1. International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, http://www.iatrcweb.org (accessed 21 May 2002)
8. Bockstael, N. (1995). Ecological economic modeling and valuation of ecosystems. Ecological Economics 14: 143-159.
9. Bradford, D. and Hildebrandt, G. (1977). Observable preferences for public goods. Journal of Public Economics 8: 111-131.
10. Camerer, C. F. and Hogarth, R. (1999). The effect of financial incentives in experiments: a review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19: 7-42.
11. Cameron, T. (1992). Combining contingent valuation and travel cost data for the valuation of nonmarket goods. Land Economics 68: 302-317.
12. Carson, R., Flores, N., Martin, K. and Wright, J. (1996). Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. Land Economics 72: 80-99.
13. Costanza, R. (1998). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics 25: 3-15.
14. Drake, L. (1992). The non-market value of agricultural landscape. European Review of Agricultural Economics 19: 351-364.
15. Epple, D. (1987). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: estimating demand and supply functions for differentiated products. Journal of Political Economy 95: 59-80.
16. Epple, D. and Sieg, H. (1999). Estimating equilibrium models of local jurisdictions. Journal of Political Economy 107(4): 645-681.
17. Gatto, P. and Merlo, M. (1999). The economic nature of stewardship: complementarity and trade-offs with food and fibre production. In G. Van Huylenbroeck and M. Whitby (eds), Countryside Stewardship.' Policies, Farmers and Markets. Oxford: Pergamon, 21-46.
18. Hanemann, W. M. (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ? American Economic Review 81: 635-647.
19. Hanemann, W. M. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 332-341.
20. Hanley, N., Whitby, M. and Simpson, I. (1999) Assessing the success of agri-environmental policy in the UK. Land Use Policy 16(2): 67-80.
21. Hausman, J. (1993). Contingent Valuation: a Critical Assessment. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Hoehn, J. and Randall, A. (1987). A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14: 226-247.
23. Hoehn, J. P. and Randall, A. (1989). Too many proposals pass the benefit cost test. American Economic Review 79: 544-551.
24. Hoehn, J. P., Lupi, F. and Kaplowitz, M. D. (2001). Untying a Lancastrian bundle: ecosystem valuation in wetlands mitigation. Working paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48824, USA.
25. Horowitz, J. K. and McConnell, K. E. (2002). A review of WTP/WTA studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (in press).
26. List, J. and Shogren, J. (1998). Calibration of the difference between actual and hypothetical valuations in a field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 37: 193-205.
27. McFadden, D. (1978). Modeling the choice of residential location. In A. Karlqvist, L. Loudqvist, F. Snickars and J. W. Weibull (eds), Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, 75-96. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
28. McFadden, D. (1999). Rationality for economists? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19(1-3): 73-105.
29. McFadden, D. (2001). Disaggregate behavioral travel demand's RUM side: a 30-year retrospective. In D. Heshner and J. King (eds), The Leading Edge of Travel Behavior Research. Oxford: Pergamon.
30. Parsons, G. and Kealy, M. (1992). Randomly drawn opportunity sets in a Random Utility Model of lake recreation. Land Economics 68: 93-106.
31. Randall, A. (1994). A difficulty with the travel cost methods. Land Economics 70: 88-96.
32. Randall, A. (1999). Taking benefits and costs seriously. In H. Folmer and T. Tietenberg (eds), The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 1999/2000. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 250-272.
33. Randall, A. and Hoehn, J.P. (1996). Embedding in market demand systems. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 369-380.
34. Randall, A. and Stoll, J. (1980). Consumer's surplus in commodity space. American Economic Review 70: 449-455.
35. Romstad, E., Vatn, A., Rorstad, P. K. and Soyland, V. (2000). Multifunctional Agriculture: Implications for Policy Design. Report 21. Aas: Agricultural University of Norway, Department of Economics and Social Sciences.
36. Seig, H., Smith, V. K., Banzhaf, H. and Walsh, R. (2001). Estimating the General Equilibrium Benefits of Large Changes in Spatially Delineated Public Goods. Working paper available from V. K. Smith at Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC, USA.
37. Smith, V. K. and Osborne, L. (1996). Do contingent valuation estimates pass a 'Scope' test: a meta analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31: 287-301.
38. Smith, V. K., Pattanayak, S. and Van Houtven, G. (2001). Benefit transfer with moments. Paper presented to Allied Social Science Association Meeting, New Orleans, LA, January.
39. Van den Bergh, J. and Button, K. (1999). Meta-analysis, economic valuation, and environmental economics. In J. van der Bergh (ed.), Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
40. Willis, K., Button, K. and Nijkamp, P. (eds) (1999) Environmental Valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.