Stimulus range bias explains the outcome of preferred-illuminance adjustments

Lighting Research and Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 433-447

  Fotios, S A ^a   Cheal, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

RANGE BIAS;

LIGHTING;

EID: 78649897324     PISSN: 14771535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1477153509356018     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Society of Light & Lighting (SLL). Code for Lighting. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann Ltd, 2002.
2. Poulton EC Bias in Quantifying Judgments. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, 1989.
3. Jou J., Leka GE, Rogers DM, Matus YE Contraction bias in memorial quantifying judgment: Does it come from a stable compressed memory representation or a dynamic adaptation process? The American Journal of Psychology 2004 ; 117: 543-564.
4. Juslén HT, Wouters Mchm, Tenner AD Preferred task-lighting levels in an industrial work area without daylight. Lighting Research and Technology 2005 ; 37: 219-233.
5. Begemann SHA, van den Beld GJ, Tenner AD Daylight, artificial light and people, part 2: Proceedings of the 23rd Session of the CIE. New Delhi, 1995: 148-151.
6. Moore T., Carter DJ, Slater A. Long-term patterns of use of occupant controlled office lighting. Lighting Research and Technology 2003 ; 35: 43-59.
7. Boyce PR, Eklund NH, Simpson SN Individual lighting control: Task performance, mood and illuminance. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 2000 ; 29: 131-142.
8. Scholz A., Farnum N., Wilkes AR, Hampson MA, Hall JE Minimum and optimum light output of Macintosh size 3 laryngoscopy blades: a manikin study. Anaesthesia 2007 ; 62: 163-168.
9. Veitch JA, Newsham GR Preferred luminous conditions in open-plan offices: Research and practice recommendations. Lighting Research and Technology 2000 ; 32: 199-212.
10. Boyce PR, Veitch JA, Newsham GR, Jones CC, Heerwagen J., Myer M., Hunter CM Occupant use of switching and dimming controls in offices. Lighting Research and Technology 2006 ; 38: 358-378.
11. Fotios SA, Cheal C. Obstacle detection: A pilot study investigating the effects of lamp type, illuminance and age. Lighting Research and Technology 2009 ; 41: 321-342.
12. Ward LM, Lockhead GR Sequential effects and memory in category judgements. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1970 ; 84: 27-34.
13. Fotios SA, Cheal C. Evidence for response contraction bias in side-by-side matching tasks. Lighting Research and Technology 2007 ; 39: 159-169.
14. Poulton EC Biases in quantitative judgements. Applied Ergonomics 1982 ; 13: 31-42.
15. Luckiesh M., Moss FK Seeing in tungsten, mercury and sodium lights. Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society 1936 ; 31: 655-674.
16. Ray S. The evaluation of a daylight tungsten lamp for task lighting. Under-graduate student research project, Department of Human Sciences, Loughborough University, 1989.
17. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, New Series 1974 ; 185: 1124-1131.
18. Newsham G., Arsenault C., Veitch J., Tosco A., Duval C. Task lighting effects on office worker satisfaction and performance, and energy efficiency. Leukos 2005 ; 1: 7-26.
19. Gescheider GA Psychophysics: The Fundamentals. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
20. Harrington RE Effect of color temperature on apparent brightness. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1954 ; 44: 113-116.
21. Fotios SA Lamp colour properties and apparent brightness: a review. Lighting Research and Technology 2001 ; 33: 163-181.
22. Fotios SA, Houser KW, Cheal C. Counterbalancing needed to avoid bias in side-by-side brightness matching tasks. Leukos 2008 ; 4: 207-223.
23. Fotios SA, Houser KW Research methods to avoid bias in categorical ratings of brightness. Leukos 2009 ; 5: 167-181.
24. Newsham G., Veitch J., Arsenault C., Duval C. Effects of dimming control on office worker satisfaction and performance: IESNA Annual Conference. Tampa, Florida, July, 2004: 19-41.
25. Rea MS, Ouellette MJ Relative visual performance: A basis for application. Lighting Research and Technology 1991 ; 23: 135-144.