Promoting screening mammography: Insight or uptake?

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 775-782

  Keen, John D ^a  

^a Jr Hospital of Cook County   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Cancer screening; Mammograms

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; SHORT SURVEY; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78649894120     PISSN: 15572625     EISSN: 15587118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.06.100065     Document Type: Short Survey

References (46)

1. Sprague BL, Trentham-Dietz A. Prevalence of breast carcinoma in situ in the United States. JAMA 2009;302:846-8.
2. Peres J. Mammography screening: after the storm, calls for more personalized approaches. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:9-11.
3. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:727-37, W237-742.
4. Marshall E. Public health. Brawling over mammography. Science 2010;327:936-8.
5. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Sox HC, Fischhoff B, Welch HG. US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross-sectional survey. BMJ 2000;320:1635-40.
6. Stefanek ME, Gritz ER, Vernon SW. Mammography and women under 50: déjà vu all over again? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19:635-9.
7. Fogelin RJ. Understanding arguments: an introduction to informal logic. 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1982.
8. Brinker NG. With breast screenings, every woman counts. USA Today 7 December 2009:Opinion;9A.
9. Javitt MC. Breast cancer awareness: taking charge of women's health. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:947.
10. Garton C. NFL players proudly wear pink. USA Today 7 October 2009. Available at: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/kindness/post/2009/10/nfl- players-proudly-wear-pink-/1. Accessed 16 September 2010.
11. Avon Foundation for Women. Early detection saves lives: breast health resource guide - information, support and resources to use and share. 8th ed. Available at: http://www.avoncompany.com/women/avoncrusade/bccguide.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2010.
12. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Welch HG. Know your chances: understanding health statistics. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2008.
13. Keen JD, Keen JE. What is the point: will screening mammography save my life? BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009;9:18.
14. Harvey JA, Strahilevitz MA. The power of pink: cause-related marketing and the impact on breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2009;6:26-32.
15. Breast-cancer awareness: too much of a good thing? Lancet Oncol 2007;8:1041.
16. Domenighetti G, D'Avanzo B, Egger M, et al. Women's perception of the benefits of mammography screening: population-based survey in four countries. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:816-21. (Pubitemid 37304647)
17. Gigerenzer G, Mata J, Frank R. Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in Europe. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:1216-20.
18. Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 1993;341:973-8.
19. Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:605-13.
20. Kramer BS, Croswell JM. Cancer screening: the clash of science and intuition. Annu Rev Med 2009;60:125-37.
21. Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I. Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA 2009;302:1685-92.
22. Berg WA. Benefits of screening mammography. JAMA 2010;303:168-9.
23. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:99-119.
24. Gotzsche PC, Hartling OJ, Nielsen M, Brodersen J, Jorgensen KJ. Breast screening: the facts- or maybe not. BMJ 2009;338:b86.
25. Heath I. Life and death. It is not wrong to say no. BMJ 2009;338:b2529.
26. Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(4):CD001877.
27. Jorgensen KJ, Gotzsche PC. Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends. BMJ 2009;339:b2587.
28. Jorgensen KJ, Zahl PH, Gotzsche PC. Overdiagnosis in organised mammography screening in Denmark. A comparative study. BMC Womens Health 2009;9:36.
29. Morrell S, Barratt A, Irwig L, Howard K, Biesheuvel C, Armstrong B. Estimates of overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer associated with screening mammography. Cancer Causes Control 2010;21:275-82.
30. Sackett DL. The arrogance of preventive medicine. CMAJ 2002;167:363-4.
31. American Cancer Society guidelines still advise yearly mammography for women aged 40-49 years. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:187-8.
32. Partridge AH, Winer EP. On mammography-more agreement than disagreement. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2499-501.
33. Berlin L, Hall FM. More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs, and polarization. Radiology 2010;255:311-6.
34. Thrall JH. US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for screening mammography: evidence-based medicine or the death of science? J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7:2-4.
35. Kent A. Mammography screening. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009;2:199-200.
36. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Welch HG. The risk of death by age, sex, and smoking status in the United States: putting health risks in context. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:845-53. (Pubitemid 351881950)
37. National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health. Statistical research and applications. Cancer query system: probability of developing or dying of cancer. Available at: http://srab.cancer.gov/devcan/canques.html. Accessed 5 June 2010.
38. Barratt A, Howard K, Irwig L, Salkeld G, Houssami N. Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices. BMJ 2005;330:936. (Pubitemid 40592311)
39. Veronesi A, Serraino D. Screening: is breast cancer overdiagnosed? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2009;6:682-3.
40. Welch HG. Overdiagnosis and mammography screening. BMJ 2009;339:b1425.
41. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. The benefits and harms of mammography screening: understanding the trade-offs. JAMA 2010;303:164-5.
42. Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, Johns L, Waller M, Bobrow L. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368:2053-60. (Pubitemid 44855105)
43. National Cancer Institute, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Performance measures for 3,884,059 screening mammography examinations from 1996 to 2007 by age. Available at: http://breastscreening.cancer.gov/data/ performance/screening/perf-age.html. Accessed 25 May 2010.
44. Mathis KL, Hoskin TL, Boughey JC, et al. Palpable presentation of breast cancer persists in the era of screening mammography. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:314-8.
45. Nekhlyudov L, Braddock CH 3rd. An approach to enhance communication about screening mammography in primary care. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009;18:1403-12.
46. Gotzsche PC, Hartling OJ, Nielsen M, Brodersen J. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. 2008. Available at: http://www.cochrane.dk/screening/ mammography-leaflet.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2010.