An approach to enhance communication about screening mammography in primary care

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1403-1412

  Nekhlyudov, Larissa ^a,b   Braddock, Clarence H ^c  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b HARVARD VANGUARD MEDICAL ASSOCIATES   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST SELF EXAMINATION; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 70349200980     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1184     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention: a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med 2004;26:56-66.
2. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, IOM. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
3. O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;CD001431.
4. Rimer BK, Briss P, Zeller PK, et al. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening? Cancer 2004;101:1214-1228.
5. Strull WM, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA 1984;252:2990-2994.
6. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 1997;277:1485-1492.
7. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, et al. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:531-535.
8. Nekhlyudov L, Li R, Fletcher SW. Information and involvement preferences of women in their 40s before their first screening mammogram. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1370-1374.
9. Chamot E, Charvet A, Perneger TV. Women's preferences for doctor's involvement in decisions about mammography screening. Med Decis Making 2004;24:379-385.
10. Braddock CH, III, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, et al. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA 1999;282:2313-2320.
11. Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implement Sci 2006;1:16.
12. Holmes-Rovner M, Nelson WL, Pignone M, et al. Are patient decision aids the best way to improve clinical decision making? Report of the IPDAS Symposium. Med Decis Making 2007;27:599-608.
13. Solomon DJ, Laird-Fick HS, Keefe CW, et al. Using a formative simulated patient excercise for curriculum evaluation. BMC Med Educ 2004;4:8.
14. McClean KL, Card SE. Informed consent skills in internal medicine residency: how are residents taught, and what do they learn? Acad Med 2004;79:128-133.
15. Keefe CW, Thompson ME, Noel MM. Medical students, clinical preventive services, and shared decision-making. Acad Med 2002;77:1160-1161.
16. Towle A, Hoffman J. An advanced communication skills course for fourth-year, post-clerkship students. Acad Med 2002;77:1165-1166.
17. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. Ca Cancer J Clin 2003;53:141-169.
18. Armstrong K, Moye E, Williams S, et al. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:516-526.
19. Qaseem A, Snow V, Sherif K, et al. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:511-515. (Pubitemid 351650560)
20. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Available at: www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ 3rduspstf=breastcancer/brcanrr.htm. Accessed June 15, 2009.
21. Braddock CH, III, Fihn SD, Levinson W, et al. How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions: informed decision making in the outpatient setting. JGIM 1997;12:339-345.
22. Marshall T. Informed consent for mammography screening: modelling the risks and benefits for American women. Health Expect 2005;8:295-305.
23. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. Ca Cancer J Clin 2006;56:106-130.
24. Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW, et al. Standard for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS). Ca Cancer J Clin 2002;52:256-276. (Pubitemid 35345498)
25. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1672-1680.
26. Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, et al. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA 2005;293:1245-1256.
27. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, et al. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1089-1096.
28. Nekhlyudov L, Ross-Degnan D, Fletcher SW. Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammography: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:182-189.
29. Kornguth PJ, Keefe FJ, Conaway MR. Pain during mammography: characteristics and relationship to demographic and medical variables. Pain 1996;66:187-194.
30. Kashikar-Zuck S, Keefe FJ, Kornguth P, et al. Pain coping and the pain experience during mammography: a preliminary study. Pain 1997;73:165-172.
31. Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1546-1554.
32. Barratt A, Howard K, Irwig L, et al. Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices. BMJ 2005;330:936.
33. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-1783.
34. MARIBS study group. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Lancet 2005;365:1769-1778.
35. Nelson HD, Huffman LH, Fu R, et al. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: systematic evidence review for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 2005;143: 362-379.
36. Breast cancer risk assessment tool. Available at: http://brca.nci.nih. gov/brc/. Accessed November 28, 2006.
37. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wiskerham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;90:1371-1388.
38. Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, et al. Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and im- plications for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93:358-366.
39. Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, et al. Effects of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;368:2053-2060.
40. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. Ca Cancer J Clin 2007;57:75-89. (Pubitemid 46535708)
41. Baxter N. Preventive health care, 2001 update: should women be routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer? CMAJ 2001;164:1837-1846.
42. Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? how? JAMA 1999;282:1270-1280.
43. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, et al. influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1399-1408.
44. Gotzsche PC, Olsen O. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 2000;355:129-134.
45. Taplin S, Abraham L, Barlow WE, et al. Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;djn172.
46. Weitzel JN, Lagos VI, Cullinane CA, et al. Limited family structure and BRCA gene mutation status in single cases of breast cancer. JAMA 2007;297:2587-2595.
47. Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, et al. Health literacy and cancer communication. Ca Cancer J Clin 2002;52:134-149.
48. Keller VF, Caroll JG. A new model for physician-patient communication. Patient Educ Couns 1994;23:131-140.
49. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
50. Fischhoff B. Why (cancer) risk communication can be hard. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999;25:7-13.
51. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Welch HG. Risk charts: putting cancer in context. J Natl Cancer Instit 2002;94:799-804.
52. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley A. Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. BMJ 2002;324:827-830.
53. Doak. Teaching patients with low literacy skills, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company, 1996.
54. Doak CC, Doak LG, Friedell GH, et al. Improving comprehension for cancer patients with low literacy skills: strategies for clinicians. Ca Cancer J Clin 1998;48:151-162.
55. Edwards A, Unigwe S, Elwyn G, et al. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about entering screening programs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;1.
56. Lewis CL, Pignone MP, Sheridan SL, et al. A randomized trial of three videos that differ in the framing of information about mammography in women 40 to 49 years old. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:875-883.