An agent-based approach to consumer's law dispute resolution

ICEIS 2010 - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn 2 AIDSS, Issue , 2010, Pages 103-110

  Costa, Nuno ^a   Carneiro, Davide ^a   Novais, Paulo ^a   Barbieri, Diovana ^b   Andrade, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Consumer law; Multi agent systems; Online dispute resolution

Indexed keywords

AGENT-BASED APPROACH; CONFLICT RESOLUTION; CONSUMER LAW; DISPUTE RESOLUTION; JUDICIAL SYSTEMS; LEGAL EXPERTS; LEGAL SYSTEM; NEW APPROACHES; ON-LINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

EID: 78649840924     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Almeida, C. F., 2005. Direito do Consume. Almedina. Coimbra (in Portuguese).
2. Almeida T., 2001. Lei de defesa do consumidor anotada, Institute do consumidor, Lisboa(in Portuguese).
3. Andrade F., Novais P., Carneiro D., Zeleznikow J., Neves J., 2009. Using BATNAs and WATNAs in Online Dispute Resolution, proceedings of the JURISIN 2009 - Third International Workshop on Juris-informatics, Tokyo, Japan, ISBN 4-915905-38-1, pp 15-26.
4. Bellifemine, F., Caire, G., Greenwood, D., 2007. Developing Multi-Agent Systems with JADE, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. West Sussex, England.
5. Chiti, G., Peruginelli, G.: Artificial intelligence in alternative dispute resolution. Proceedings of LEA, pp. 97-104.(2002)
6. De Vries BR., Leenes, R., Zeleznikow, J., Fundamentals of providing negotiation support online: the need for developping BATNAs. Proceedings of the Second International ODR Workshop, Tilburg, Wolf Legal Publishers (2005) 59-67.
7. Goodman, J.W., The pros and cons of online dispute resolution: an assessment of cyber-mediation websites, in Duke Law and Technology Review (2003).
8. Jennings, N., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., & Sierra, C.: Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(2), 199-215. (2001)
9. Klamig, L., Van Veenen, J., Leenes, R., I want the opposite of what you want: summary of a study on the reduction of fixed-pie perceptions in online negotiations. "Expanding the horizons of ODR", Proceedings of the 5th International Worhhop on Online Dispute Resolution (ODR Workshop'08), Firenze, Italy (2008) 84-94.
10. Leake, D. B. (1996). Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions. AAAI Press.
11. Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., Minton, J., Zone of Potential Agreement, In Negotiation, 3rd Edition. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin-McGraw Hill (1999).
12. Muecke, N., Stranieri, A., Miller, C., The integration of online dispute resolution and decision support systems. Expanding the horizons of ODR, Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution (ODR Workshop'08), Firenze, Italy (2008) 62-72.
13. Notini, J.: Effective Alternatives Analysis In Mediation: "BATNA/WATNA" Analysis Demystified, (http://www.mediate.com/articles/ notini1.cfm), 2005. Last accessed on November, 2009.
14. Silva, J. C., 2006. Venda de bens de consume. DL no. 67/2003, de 8 de Abril. Directiva no. 1999/44/CE. Comentário. Almedina. Coimbra (in Portuguese).
15. Silva, J. C., 2006. Compra e Venda de Coisas Defeituosas. Conformidade e Segurança. Almedina. Coimbra (in Portuguese).