An agent-based model for the interplay of information and emotion in social diffusion

Proceedings - 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT 2010

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 439-444

  Hoogendoorn, Mark ^a   Treur, Jan ^a   Van Der Wal, C Natalie ^a   Van Wissen, Arlette ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agent modeling; Computational modeling; Emotion contagion; Group processes

Indexed keywords

AGENT MODELING; AGENT-BASED MODEL; COMPUTATIONAL MODELING; EMERGENCY EVACUATION; EMOTION CONTAGION; EMOTIONAL STATE; GROUP PROCESS; INFORMATION PROCESSING;

DATA PROCESSING;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

EID: 78649836203     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.181     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Appendix A htp:/www.cs.vu.nl/~mhoogen/social-diffusion AppendixA.pdf
2. Barsade, S.G.: The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 2002, 644-675.
3. Bodenhausen, G.V., Sheppard, L., & Kramer, G.: Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 199445-62
4. rd European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, ECMS'2009, 2009, pp. 212-218
5. Bosse, T., Duell, R., Memon, Z.A., Treur, J., and Wal, C.N. van der, A Multi-Agent Model for Emotion Contagion Spirals Integrated within a Supporting Ambient Agent Model. In: Yang, J.-J. et al. (eds), Proceedings of PRIMA'09. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol 5925. Springer Verlag, 2009, pp. 48-67.
6. Boulahanis, J., Heltsley, M. Perceived Fears: The Reporting Patterns of Juvenile Homicide in Chicago Newspapers Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15(132), 2004.
7. Chen, E., Lewin, M., & Craske, M. Effects of state anxiety on selective processing of threatening information. Cognition and Emotion, 10 1996, pp. 225-240.
8. Cote, S. Reconciling the feelings-as-information and hedonic contingency models of how mood influences systematic information processing. J. of Applied Soc. Psychology, 35(8), 2005, pp.1656-1679.
9. Duell, R., Memon, Z.A., Treur, J., Wal, C.N. van der.: An Ambient Agent Model for Group Emotion Support. In: Proc. of the Third Intern. Conf. on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, ACII'09. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2009, pp. 550-557.
10. Frederickson, B.L. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. America Psychologist, 56, 2001, pp. 218-226.
11. Frederickson, B.L., and Branigan, C Positive Emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion. 19(3) 2005, pp. 313-332.
12. Friedman, H., Riggio, R. Effect of Individual Differences in Nonverbal Expressiveness on Transmission of Emotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6(2), 1981.
13. Hedström, Peter, Rickard Sandell and Charlotta Stern: Mesolevel Networks and the Diffusion of Social Movements: The Case of the Swedih Social Democratic Party, American J. of Sociology, 106 (1), 2000, pp. 145-172.
14. Nabi, R.L. Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model Communication Monographs, 69, 2002, pp. 204-216.
15. Nabi, R.L. Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentiallly influence information accessibity, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30 (224) 2003, pp. 224-247.
16. Pan, X., Han, C., Dauber, K., Law,K.: Human and social behaviour in computational modeling and analysis of egress. Automation in Construction 15(4) 2006, pp. 448-461.
17. Patrick, C., Cuthbert, B., and Lang, P. Emotion in the Criminal sychopath: Fear Image Processing. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(3), 1994, pp. 523-534.
18. Rogers, E.: Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York, 1983.
19. st Intern. Conf. on ICT & Accessibility, ICTA'2007, 2007, pp. 219-224.
20. Witte, K. Allen, M. A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns. Health Educ Behav, 27(5), 2000, pp. 591-615.