Hitchhikers on trade routes: A phenology model estimates the probabilities of gypsy moth introduction and establishment

Ecological Applications

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2300-2309

  Gray, David R ^a  

^a LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alien species; Auckland; Biological invasion; Canada; Gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar); Introduced species; Invasion vector; Japan; Kobe; New Zealand; Pest establishment; Risk analysis; Risk estimation; Russia; Vancouver; Vladivostok

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CONTAINER SHIP; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; INVASIVE SPECIES; LIFE CYCLE; MOTH; PEST SPECIES; PHENOLOGY; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CANADA; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; INTRODUCED SPECIES; JAPAN; MOTH; NEW ZEALAND; PHYSIOLOGY; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; TIME; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT;

ANIMALS; CANADA; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; INTRODUCED SPECIES; JAPAN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTHS; NEW ZEALAND; RUSSIA; TIME FACTORS; TRANSPORTATION;

AUCKLAND; BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA; HONSHU; HYOGO; JAPAN; KINKI; KOBE; NEW ZEALAND; NORTH ISLAND; PRIMORYE; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; VANCOUVER; VLADIVOSTOK;

HEXAPODA; LYMANTRIA; LYMANTRIA DISPAR;

EID: 78649835875     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/09-1540.1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allen, J. C., J. L. Foltz, W. N. Dixon, A. M. Liebhold, J. J. Colbert, J. Regniere, D. R. Gray, J. W. Wilder, and I. Christie. 1993. Will the gypsy moth become a pest in Florida? Florida Entomologist 76:102-113
2. Anonymous. 2008. Gypsy moth levy unchanged in 2008-09. Biosecurity Magazine 84:11.
3. Ayres, M. P., and M. J. Lombardero. 2000. Assessing the consequences of global change for forest disturbance from herbivores and pathogens. Science of the Total Environment 262:263-286.
4. Biosecurity New Zealand. 2007. Joint decision-making and resourcing for readiness and incursion responses. Discussion paper. Biosecurity New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand. (http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/strategy-and- consultation/consultation/discussion-documents/joint-decision-making)
5. Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis. 2008. Canadian global circulation model. Version 3.1/T63 model output. {http://www.cccma.ec.gc.ca/ data/cgcm3/cgcm3-t63-20c3m.shtml)
6. Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 2010. Asian gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.): plant protection policy for marine vessels. Plant protection policy directive D-95-03. {http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/protect/dir/d-95- 03e. shtml)
7. Canadian Food Inspection Agency and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2009. Asian gypsy moth alert. {http://www.cbp. gov/linkhandler/cgov/border-security/ port-activities/agro-inspection/agm-alerts.ctt/agm-alerts.doc)
8. Earth Info. 2008. Global historical climatology network, global daily. {http://www.earthinfo.com/databases/databases.htm)
9. Egerton, F. N. 2006. A history of the ecological sciences, part 21: Reaumur and his history of insects. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 87:212-224.
10. Gray, D. R. 2004. The gypsy moth life stage model: landscape-wide estimates of gypsy moth establishment using a multi-generational phenology model. Ecological Modelling 176: 155-171.
11. Gray, D. R. 2009. Age-dependent postdiapause development in the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) life stage model. Environmental Entomology 38:18-25.
12. Gray, D. R., J. A. Logan, F. W. Ravlin, and J. A. Carlson. 1991. Toward a model of gypsy moth egg phenology: using respiration rates of individual eggs to determine temperature-time requirements of prediapause development. Environmental Entomology 20:1645-1652.
13. Gray, D. R., F. W. Ravlin, and J. A. Braine. 2001. Diapause in the gypsy moth: a model of inhibition and development. Journal ofInsect Physiology 47:173-184.
14. Gray, D. R., F. W. Ravlin, J. Regniere, and J. A. Logan. 1995. Further advances toward a model ofgypsy moth (Lymantria dispar (L.)) egg phenology: respiration rates and thermal responsiveness during diapause, and age-dependent develop-mental rates in postdiapause. Journal of Insect Physiology 41:247-256.
15. Hopper, B. E. 1993. Pest risk analysis: defining the concept. International approaches to plant pest risk analysis. Pages 19-30 in Proceedings of the APHIS/NAPPO International Workshop on the Identification, Assessment, and Manage-ment of Risks due to Exotic Agricultural Pests, Ottawa, Canada. North American Plant Protection Organization, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
16. Kerdelhue, C., L. Zane, M. Simonato, P. Salvato, J. Rousselet, A. Roques, and A. Battisti. 2009. Quaternary history and contemporary patterns in a currently expanding species. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9:1-14.
17. Klein, B. P., and K. N. Cukier. 2009. Tamed tigers, distressed dragons; how export-led growth derailed Asia's economies. Foreign Affairs 88:8-16.
18. Liebhold, A. M., J. A. Halverson, and G. A. Elmes. 1992. Gyspy moth invasion in North America: a quantitative analysis. Journal of Biogeography 19:513-520.
19. Liebhold, A., V. Mastro, and P. Schaefer. 1989. Learning from the legacy of Leopold Trouvelot. Bulletin of the Entomo-logical Society of America 35:20-22.
20. Liebhold, A. M., and P. C. Tobin. 2008. Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. Annual Review of Entomology 53:387-408.
21. Lieth, H. 1974. Phenology and seasonality modeling. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
22. Logan, J. A., P. A. Casagrande, and A. M. Liebhold. 1991. Modeling environment for simulation of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) larval phenology. Environmental Entomology 20:1516-1525.
23. Logan, J. A., J. Regniere, D. R. Gray, and A. S. Munson. 2006. Risk assessment in face of a changing environment: gypsy moth and climate change in Utah. Ecological Applications 17:101-117.
24. Mason, C. J., and M. L. McManus. 1981. Larval dispersal of the gypsy moth. Pages 160-202 in C. C. Doane and M. L. McManus, editors. The gypsy moth: research toward integrated pest management. USDA Technical Bulletin 1584. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C., USA.
25. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Biosecurity New Zealand. 2008. Pest risk analysis for six moth species: lessons for the biosecurity system on managing hitchhiker organisms. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Biosecurity New Zealand Wellington, New Zealand. {http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/ biosec/consult/risk-analysis-moths.pdf)
26. New Zealand National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research. 2002. National climate database. {http://cliflo. niwa.co.nz/)
27. Pitt, J. P. W., J. Regniere, and S. Worner. 2007. Risk assessment of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.), in New Zealand based on phenology modelling. International Journal ofBiometeorology 51:295-305.
28. Regniere, J. 1996. Generalized approach to landscape-wide seasonal forecasting with temperature-driven simulation models. Environmental Entomology 25:869-881.
29. Regniere, J., and V. Nealis. 2002. Modelling seasonality of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), to evaluate probability of its persistence in novel environ-ments. Canadian Entomologist 134:805-824.
30. Robertson, C., M. A. Wulder, B. Boots, T. A. Nelson, and D. E. Jelinski. 2009. Spatial-temporal analysis of species range expansion: the case of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonusponderosae. Journal of Biogeography 36:1446-1458.
31. Robinet, C., A. E. Liebhold, and D. R. Gray. 2007. Variation in developmental time affects mating success and Allee effects. Oikos 116:1227-1237.
32. Schmoldt, D. L. 2001. Application of artificial intelligence to risk analysis for forested ecosystems. Pages 49-74 in K. Von Gadow, editor. Risk analysis in forest management. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
33. Sharov, A. A., and A. M. Liebhold. 1998. Model ofslowing the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) with a barrier zone. Ecological Applications 8:1170-1179.
34. Sheehan, K. A. 1992. User's guide for GMPHEN gypsy moth phenology model. General Technical Report NE-158. USDA, Forest Service, Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA.
35. Shigesada, N., and K. Kawasaki. 1997. Biological invasions: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
36. Sutherst, R. W., and G. F. Maywald. 1985. A computerized system for matching climates in ecology. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 13:281-299.
37. Sutherst, R. W., J. P. Spradbery, and G. F. Maywald. 1989. The potential geographical distribution of the Old World screw-worm, Chrysomya bezziana. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 3:273-280.
38. Tatem, A. J., S. I. Hay, and D. J. Rogers. 2006. Global traffic and disease vector dispersal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:6242-6247.
39. USDA/APHIS/PPQ [U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine] 2010. Manual for agricultural clearance. {http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import-export/plants/manuals/ ports/downloads/mac.pdf)
40. Walter, H., H. Harnickell, and D. Mueller-Dombois. 1975. Climate-diagram maps of the individual continents and the ecological climatic regions of the earth. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
41. Weseloh, R. M. 1997. Evidence for limited dispersal of larval gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantrii-dae). Canadian Entomologist 129:355-361.
42. Worner, S. P. 1988. Ecoclimatic assessment of potential establishment of exotic pests. Journal of Economic Ento-mology 81:973-983.