Risk assessment in the face of a changing environment: Gypsy moth and climate change in Utah

Ecological Applications

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 101-117

  Logan, J A ^a,c   Regniere J ^b   Gray, D R ^b   Munson, A S ^a  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

^c Atlantic Forestry Centre ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Aspen; Climate change; Climatic suitability; Exotic pests; Global warming; Gypsy moth; Introduced species; Lymantria dispar; Maple; Oak; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; CLIMATE MODELING; DECIDUOUS TREE; FITNESS; INVASIVE SPECIES; MOTH; NATIVE SPECIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TWENTY FIRST CENTURY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLIMATE; MOTH; PHYSIOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; CLIMATE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOTHS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UTAH;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; UTAH;

ACER; HEXAPODA; LYMANTRIA; LYMANTRIA DISPAR;

EID: 34247103968     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2007)017[0101:RAITFO]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baldwin, C. K. 2003. Historical climate analysis. Pages 58-72 in F. H. Wagner, editor. Preparing for a changing climate: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. Report of the Rocky Mountain/Great Basin Regional Assessment Team for the U.S. Global Change Research Program, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
2. Barbosa, P., and V. A. Krischik. 1987. Influence of alkaloids on feeding preference of eastern deciduous forest trees by the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar). American Naturalist 130:53-69.
3. Benoit, P., and D. Lachance. 1990. Gypsy moth in Canada: behavior and control. Canadian Forest Service, Forestry Canada, Quebec Region, Information Report DPC-X-32.
4. Deutsch, C. V., and A. G. Journel. 1992. GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user's guide. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
5. Edwards, T. C., Jr., C. G. Homer, S. D. Bassett, A. Falconer, R. D. Ramsey, and D. W. Wight. 1995. Utah GAP analysis: an environmental information system. Technical paper No. 95-1, Utah Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
6. Forbush, E. H., and C. H. Fernald. 1896. The gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (Linn.). Wright and Potter, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
7. Foss, L. K., and L. K. Rieske. 2003. Species-specific differences in oak foliage affect preference and performance of gypsy moth caterpillars. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 108:87-93.
8. Gignac, M. 2000. Comparaison de la régression spatiale et du krigeage avec dérive pour interpoler les extrants de modèles de simulation de développement d'insectes au Québec en fonction de l'échelle, de la topographie et de l'influence maritime. Thèse de Maîtrise [Thesis], Faculté de Foresterie et de Géomatique, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
9. Gray, D. R. 2004. The gypsy moth life stage model: landscape-wide estimates of gypsy moth establishment using a multi-generational phenology model. Ecological Modelling 176:155-171.
10. Gray, D. R., J. A. Logan, F. W. Ravlin, and J. A. Carlson. 1991. Toward a model of gypsy moth phenology: using respiration rates of individual eggs to determine temperature-time requirements of prediapause development. Environmental Entomology 20:1645-1652.
11. Gray, D. R., F. W. Ravlin, and J. A. Braine. 2001. Diapause in the gypsy moth: a model of inhibition and development. Journal of Insect Physiology 47:173-184.
12. Gray, D. R., F. W. Ravlin, J. Régnière, and J. A. Logan. 1995. Further advances toward a model of gypsy moth egg phenology: respiration rates and thermal responsiveness during diapause, and age-dependent developmental rates in postdiapause. Journal of Insect Physiology 41:247-256.
13. Hutchinson, M. F. 1995. Stochastic space-time weather models from ground-based data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 73:237-264.
14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). J. T. Houghton, G. J. Jenkins, and J. J. Ephraums, editors. 1990. Climate change: the IPCC scientific assessment. Report prepared for IPCC by Working Group I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Jarvis, C. H., and R. H. A. Baker. 2001a. Risk assessment for non-indigenous pests: 1. Mapping the outputs of phenology models to assess the likelihood of establishment. Diversity and Distributions 7:223-235.
16. Jarvis, C., and R. H. A. Baker. 2001b. Risk assessment for nonindigenous pests: 2. Accounting for interyear climate variability. Diversity and Distributions 7:237-248.
17. Jarvis, C. H., R. H. A. Baker, and D. Morgan. 2003. The impact of interpolated daily temperature data on landscapewide predictions of invertebrate pest phenology. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 94:169-181.
18. Kittel, T. G. F., N. A. Rosenbloom, T. H. Painter, and D. S. Schimel. 1995. The VEMAP integrated database for modeling United States ecosystem/vegetation sensitivity to climate change. Journal of Biogeography 22:857-862.
19. Liebhold, A. M., K. W. Gottshalk, R. Muzika, M. E. Montgomery, R. Young, K. O'Day, and B. Kelly. 1995. Suitability of North American tree species to the gypsy moth: a summary of field and laboratory tests. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report NE-211, Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA.
20. Logan, J. A., R. A. Casagrande, and A. M. Liebhold. 1991. A modeling environment for simulation of gypsy moth larval phenology. Environmental Entomology 20:1516-1525.
21. Logan, J. A., and J. A. Powell. 2001. Ghost forests, global warming, and the mountain pine beetle. American Entomologist 47:160-173.
22. Logan, J. A., and J. A. Powell. 2004. Modelling mountain pine beetle phenological response to temperature. Pages 210-222 in T. L. Shore, J. E. Brooks, and J. E. Stone, editors. Mountain Pine Beetle Symposium: Challenges and Solutions, 30-31 October 2003, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, British Columbia, Information Report BC-X-399.
23. Logan, J. A., J. Régnière, and J. A. Powell. 2003. Assessing the impacts of global warming on forest pest dynamics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:130-137.
24. Logan, J. A., D. J. Wollkind, S. C. Hoyt, and L. K. Tanigoshi. 1976. An analytical model for description of temperature dependent rate phenomena in arthropods. Environmental Entomology 5:1133-1140.
25. Ludwig, D., D. Jones, and C. S. Holling. 1978. Qualitative analysis of insect outbreak systems: the spruce budworm and the forest. Journal of Animal Ecology 47:315-332.
26. Mearns, L. O. 2003a. Global and regional climate models and possible scenarios. Pages 44-45 in F. H. Wagner, editor. Preparing for a changing climate: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. Report of the Rocky Mountain/Great Basin Regional Assessment Team for the U.S. Global Change Research Program, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
27. Mearns, L. O. 2003b. GCM scenarios for the RMGB region. Pages 72-73 in F. H. Wagner, editor. Preparing for a changing climate: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. Report of the Rocky Mountain/Great Basin Regional Assessment Team for the U.S. Global Change Research Program, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
28. Miller, J. C., and P. E. Hanson. 1989. Laboratory feeding tests on the development of gypsy moth larvae with references to plant taxa and allelochemicals. Agricultural Experiment Station, Station Bulletin 674, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
29. Montgomery, M. L., and W. E. Wallner. 1988. The gypsy moth: a westward migrant. Pages 73-84 in A. A. Berryman, editor. Dynamics of forest insect populations. Plenum, New York, New York, USA.
30. Mosher, F. H. 1915. Food plants of the gypsy moth in America. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bulletin 250, Washington, D.C., USA.
31. Nalder, I. A., and R. W. Wein. 1998. Spatial interpolation of climatic normals: test of a new method in the Canadian boreal forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 9:211-225.
32. Nealis, V. G., and S. Erb. 1993. A sourcebook for management of the gypsy moth. Forestry Canada, Ontario Region. Department of Supply and Services Canada Catalogue No. FO42-193/1993E.
33. Powell, J. A., and J. A. Logan. 2005. Insect seasonality: circle map analysis of temperature-driven life cycles. Theoretical Population Biology 67:161-179.
34. Racsko, P, L. Szeidl, and M. Semonov. 1991. A serial approach to local stochastic weather models. Ecological Modelling 57:27-41.
35. Régnière, J. 1996. A generalized approach to landscape-wide seasonal forecasting with temperature-driven simulation models. Environmental Entomology 25:869-881.
36. Régnière, J., and P. V. Bolstad. 1994. Statistical simulation of daily air temperature patterns in eastern North America to forecast seasonal events in insect pest management. Environmental Entomology 23:1368-1380.
37. Régnière, J., and J. A. Logan. 2003. Animal life cycle models. Pages 237-254 in M. Schwartz, editor. Phenology: an integrative environmental science. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
38. Régnière, J., and V. Nealis. 2002. Modelling seasonality of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), to evaluate probability of its persistence in novel environments. Canadian Entomologist 134:805-824.
39. Régnière, J., and A. Sharov. 1997. Forecasting Gypsy moth flight in the Northeastern US with BioSIM. Pages 99-103 in Integrating spatial information technologies for tomorrow. Proceedings, 11th annual symposium on GIS. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 17-20 February 1997. GIS World, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
40. Régnière, J., and A. Sharov. 1998. Phenology of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), male flight and the effect of dispersal in heterogeneous landscapes. International Journal of Biometerology 41:161-168.
41. Régnière, J., and A. Sharov. 1999. Simulating temperature-dependent ecological processes at sub-continental scale: male Gypsy moth flight phenology as an example. International Journal of Biometerology 42:146-152.
42. Richardson, C. W. 1981. Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature and solar radiation. Water Resources Research 17:182-190.
43. Richardson, C. W., and D. A. Wright. 1984. WGEN: a model for generating daily weather variables. Agricultural Research Service 8. USDA, Washington, D.C., USA.
44. Rogers, P. 2002. Using forest health monitoring to assess aspen forest cover change in the Southern Rockies. Forest Ecology and Management 155:223-236.
45. Sharov, A. A., and A. M. Liebhold. 1998. Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Ecological Applications 8:833-845.
46. Sheehan, K. A. 1992. Users guide for GMPHEN: gypsy moth phenology model. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-158.
47. Shepperd, W. D, D. Blinkley, D. L. Bartos, T. J. Stohlgren, and L. G. Eskew, compilers. 2001. Sustaining aspen in western landscapes: symposium proceedings, 13-15 June 2000, Grand Junction, Colorado, USA. Proceedings RMRS-P-18. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
48. Wagner, F. H. 2003. Scenario choices for RMGB assessment. Pages 73-77 in F. Wagner, editor. Preparing for a changing climate: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. Report of the Rocky Mountain/Great Basin Regional Assessment Team for the Global Change Research Program, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
49. Wilks, D. S. 1999. Simultaneous stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature and solar radiation at multiple sites in complex terrain. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 96:85-101.