Data Literacy: Understanding Teachers' Data Use in a Context of Accountability and Response to Intervention

Action in Teacher Education

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 41-55

  Jacobs, Jennifer ^a   Gregory, Angela ^b   Hoppey, David ^c   Yendol Hoppey, Diane ^c  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649807177     PISSN: 01626620     EISSN: 21586098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2009.10463527     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baker, E. L., Linn, R. L., Herman, J. L., and Koretz, D., 2002. Standards for educational accountability systems, Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. (CRESST Policy Brief No. 5)
2. Barnes, A. C., and Harlacher, J. E., 2008. Clearing the confusion: RTI as a set of principles. Education & Treatment of Children, 31 (3): 417–431.
3. Borko, H., Mayfield, V., and Marion, S. F., 1997. Teachers' developing ideas and practices about mathematics performance assessment: Successes, stumbling blocks, and implications for professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13: 259–278.
4. Brown-Childsey, R., and Steege, M. W., 2005. Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice, New York: Guilford Press.
5. Bryant, B., and Pedrotty-Bryant, D., 2008. Introduction to the special series: Mathematics and learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 31 (1): 3–8.
6. Danielson, L., Doolittle, J., and Bradley, R., 2007. Professional development, capacity building, and research needs: Critical issues for response to intervention implementation. School Psychology Review, 36 (4): 632–637.
7. Darling-Hammond, L., 1994. Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64 (1): 5–30.
8. Fu, D., and Lamme, L., 2002. Assessment through conversation. Language Arts, 79 (3): 241–250.
9. Fuchs, D., and Fuchs, L. S., 2006. Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?. Reading Research Quarterly, 41 (1): 93–99.
10. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., and Young, C. L., 2003. Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18: 157–171.
11. Gresham, F. M., VanDerHeyden, A., and Witt, J. C., 2005. Response to intervention in the identification of learning disabilities: Empirical support and future challenges Unpublished manuscript. Available online at http://www.joewitt.org/Downloads/Response%20to%20Intervention%20MS%20Gresham%20%20Vanderheyden%20Witt.pdf
12. Huffman, D., and Kalnin, J., 2003. Collaborative inquiry to make data-based decisions in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19: 569–580.
13. Kovaleski, J. F., 2007. Response to intervention: Considerations for research and systems change. School Psychology Review, 36 (4): 638–646.
14. Love, N., 2004. Taking data to new depths. Journal of Staff Development, 25 (4): 22–26.
15. Marton, F., 1981. Phenomenography-describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10: 177–200.
16. Marton, F., and Booth, S., 1997. Learning and awareness, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Mertler, C. A., 2004. Secondary teachers' assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference?. American Secondary Education, 33 (1): 49–64.
18. National Association of State Directors of Special Education. 2006. Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation, Alexandria, VA: Author.
19. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. 2005. Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities Retrieved September 2, 2008, from http://www.ldonline.org/njcld
20. Palenchar, L., Brown, D., and Jennings, L., 2006. Response to intervention: An implementation and technical assistance guide for districts and schools, Charleston, WV: West Virginia Department of Education.
21. Quilter, S. M., and Gallini, J. K., 2000. Teachers' assessment literacy and attitudes. The Teacher Educator, 36 (2): 115–131.
22. Stephens, D., Pearson, P. D., Gilrane, C., Roe, M., Stallman, A. C., and Shelton, J., 1995. Assessment and decision making in schools: A cross-site analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 30 (3): 478–499.
23. Strahan, D., Carlone, H., Horn, S., Dallas, F., and Ware, A., 2003. Beating the odds at Archer Elementary School: Developing a shared stance toward learning. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18 (3): 204–221.
24. Tomlinson, C. A., 2004. How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms, Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
25. Wade, R. K., 2004. “It takes a district” to build collective accountability and raise student achievement. New England Reading Association Journal, 40 (2): 24–30.
26. Wanzek, J., and Vaughn, S., 2007. Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36: 541–561.