A comparison of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography screening strategies in the detection and recovery of subcentimeter adenomas

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 105, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2578-2585

  Benson, Mark ^a   Dureja, Parul ^a   Gopal, Deepak ^a   Reichelderfer, Mark ^a   Pfau, Patrick R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURGERY; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POLYP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUBCENTIMETER ADENOMA; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADENOMA; CATHARTICS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 78649804234     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.362     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58: 71-96.
2. Cappell MS. From colonic polyps to colon cancer: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis. Clin Lab Med 2005;25: 135-77.
3. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O'Brien MJ et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals aft er colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. Th e National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;328: 901-6.
4. Eide TJ. Risk of colorectal cancer in adenoma-bearing individuals within a defi ned population. Int J Cancer 1986;38: 173-6.
5. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE et al. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 1987;93: 1009-13.
6. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993;329: 1977-81.
7. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R et al. Effi cacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 2001;48: 812-5.
8. Thiis-Evensen E,Hoff GS,Sauar J,et al., Patient tolerance of colonoscopy without sedation during screening examination for colorectal polyps., Gastrointest Endosc, 2000, 52, 606-10.
9. Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN et al. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15: 389-94.
10. Harewood GC, Lieberman DA. Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of medicare coverage for average-risk screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2: 72-7.
11. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al. CT colonography vs. colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007;357: 1403-12.
12. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. Th e advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002;12: 1-9.
13. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1207-17.
14. Church JM. Clinical signifi cance of small colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47: 481-5.
15. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005;236: 3-9.
16. Barancin C, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH et al. Prospective blinded study of polyp size on CT colonography and various endoscopic measures. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67: AB305.
17. Benson M, Gopal D, Reichelderfer M et al. Follow up recommendations in patients with positive CT colonography and negative optical colonoscopy exams. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69: AB134.
18. Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J et al. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008;135: 1100-5.
19. Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H et al. Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4: 343-8.
20. Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Reichelderfer M et al. Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers. Radiology 2006;241: 417-25.
21. Rex DK, Lieberman D. ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT-colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101: 1410-3.
22. Dureja P, Gopal DV, Reichelderfer M et al. Pathology of the 6-9 mm polyp found in a CT colonography screening program: implications for CT polyp surveillance vs resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69: AB113.
23. Pickhardt P, Choi J, Hwang I et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349: 2191-200.
24. Hoff G, Foerster A, Vatn M et al. Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986;21: 853-62.
25. Bersenes K, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE et al. Lack of spontaneous regression of tubular adenomas in two years of follow-up. Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92: 1117-20.
26. Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 1996;39: 449-56.
27. Loeve F, Boer R, Zauber A et al. National polyp study data: evidence for regression of adenomas. Int J Cancer 2004;111: 633-9.
28. Rex D. American College of Gastroenterology action plan for colorectal cancer prevention. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99: 574-7.
29. Van Dam J, Cotton C, Johnson CD et al. AGA future trends report: CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2004;127: 970-84.
30. McFarland E, Fletcher J, Pickhardt P et al. ACR colon cancer committee white paper: status on CT colonography 2009. J Am Coll Radiol 2009;6: 756-72.
31. Nelson DB, McQuaid KR, Bond JH et al. Procedural success and compli cations of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55: 307-14.
32. Sosna J, Blachar A, Amitai M et al. Colonic perforation of CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. Radiology 2006;239: 457-63.
33. Ko C, Riffl e S, Michaels L et al. Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8: 166-73.