American College of Gastroenterology Action Plan for Colorectal Cancer Prevention

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 574-577

  Rex, Douglas K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER RESEARCH; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DNA DETERMINATION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TREATMENT PLANNING;

COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DNA, NEOPLASM; FECES; HUMANS;

EID: 2342657388     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04108.x     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Lieberman DA, et al. Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: Screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:868-77.
2. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale. Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003;124:544-60.
3. Levin TR, Palitz A, Grossman S, et al. Predicting advanced proximal colonic neoplasia with screening sigmoidoscopy. JAMA 1999;281:1611-7.
4. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, et al. Using risk for advanced proximal colonic neoplasia to tailor endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:959-65.
5. Betés M, Muñoz-Navas MA, Duque JM, et al. Use of colonoscopy as a primary screening test for colorectal cancer in average risk people. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:2648-54.
6. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977-81.
7. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. The Funen adenoma follow-up study: Incidence and death from colorectal carcinoma in an adenoma surveillance program. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;28:869-74.
8. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, et al. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 2001;48:812-5.
9. Thiss-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J, et al. Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: Effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;34:414-20.
10. Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Corle D, et al. Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1149-55.
11. Alberts DS, Martinez ME, Roe DJ, et al. Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1156-62.
12. Robertson DJ, Mott L, Baron JA, et al. Colorectal cancer after "clearing" colonoscopy: Experience from 3 large adenoma chemoprevention trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:S123.
13. Rex DK, Bond J, Feld A. Medical-legal risk of incident colorectal cancers after clearing colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:952-7.
14. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:33-6.
15. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24-8.
16. Hixson LS, Fennerty MD, Sampliner RE, et al. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:1769-72.
17. Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I, et al. A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:2543-9.
18. Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: A prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 2000;355:1211-4.
19. Saitoh Y, Waxman I, West B, et al. Prevalence and distinctive biologic features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1657-65.
20. Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E, et al. Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: A prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 2002;51:550-5.
21. Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, et al. Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:333-8.
22. Leard LE, Savides TJ, Ganiats TG. Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening. J Fam Pract 1997;45:211-8.
23. Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, et al. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: A population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:203-6.
24. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Palesch YY, et al. Virtual colonoscopy: Final results from a multicenter study(abstract). Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:AB174.
25. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of CT colonography for screen-detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003;125:311-9.
26. Rex DK. Is virtual colonoscopy ready for widespread application? Gastroenterology 2003;125:608-14.
27. Rex DK. Considering virtual colonoscopy. Rev Gastroenterol Dis 2002;3:97-105.
28. Pickhardt PJ, Choi R, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191-200.
29. Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Bauerfeind P. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2268-74.
30. Matek W, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Demling L. Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas. Endoscopy 1985;17:175-81.
31. Morson BC. The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel. Proc R Soc Med 1974;67:451.
32. Shinya H, Wolff WI. Morphology, anatomic distribution, and cancer potential of colonic polyps. Ann Surg 1979;190:679-83.
33. Waye JD. The development of carcinoma of the colon. Am J Gastroenterol 1977;67:427-9.
34. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, et al. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: Prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 2002;222:337-45.
35. Angtuaco TL, Banaad-Omiotek GD, Howden CW. Differing attitudes toward virtual and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: Surveys among primary care physicians and potential patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:887-93.
36. Akerkar GA, Yee J, Hung R, et al. Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:310-5.
37. Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, et al. Patient acceptance for CT colonography: What is the real issue? Eur Radiol 2002;12:1410-5.
38. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: Prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 2003;227:378-84.
39. Syngal S, Chung D, Willett C, et al. Stool DNA analysis for the detection and follow-up of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenomas (AA): Sensitivity in a prospective series. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:S109.
40. Schroy PC, Heeren TC. A comparative study of patient perceptions and screening preferences for stool-based DNA testing (SBDNA), fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), or colonoscopy (CS). Gastroenterology 2003;124:A481.
41. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the U.S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1296-308.