An explanatory framework for chemistry education the two-world model

Egitim ve Bilim

Volumn 35, Issue 157, 2010, Pages 84-99

  Pekdaǧ, Bülent ^a   Le Maréchal, Jean François ^b  

^a BALIKESIR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Chemical reaction; Chemistry education; Laboratory work; Two world model; Video

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649799553     PISSN: 13001337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adbo, K. & Taber, K. S. (2009). Learners' mental models of the particle nature of matter: A study of 16-year-old Swedish science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 757-786.
2. Agung, S. & Schwartz, M. S. (2007). Students' understanding of conservation of matter, stoichiometry and balancing equations in Indonesia. International Journal of Science Education, 29(13), 1679-1702.
3. Andersson, B. (1986). Pupils' explanations of some aspects of chemical reactions. Science Education, 70(5), 549-563.
4. Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18(1), 53-85.
5. Bar, V. & Galili, I. (1994). Stages of children's views about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 157-174.
6. Barker, V. & Millar, R. (1999). Students' reasoning about chemical reactions: What changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 645-665.
7. Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B. & Silberstein, J. (1987). Students' visualization of a chemical reaction. Education in Chemistry, 24, 117-120.
8. Bergquist, W. & Heikkinen, H. (1990). Student ideas regarding chemical equilibrium: What written test answers do not reveal. Journal ofChemical Education, 67(12), 1000-1003.
9. Boo, H.-K. & Watson, J. R. (2001). Progression in high school students' (aged 16-18) conceptualizations about chemical reactions in solution. Science Education, 85(5), 568-585.
10. Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J. & Windschitl, M. A. (1998). Developing and using conceptual computer animations for chemistry instruction. Journal ofChemical Education, 75(12), 1658¬1660.
11. Cakmakci, G., Leach, J. & Donnelly, J. (2006). Students' ideas about reaction rate and its relationship with concentration or pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1795¬1815.
12. Canpolat, N. (2006). Turkish undergraduates' misconceptions of evaporation, evaporation rate, and vapour pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1757-1770.
13. Cavallo, A., McNeely, J. C. & Marek, E. A. (2003). Eliciting students' understandings of chemical reactions using two forms of essay questions during a learning cycle. International Journal ofScience Education, 25(5), 583-603.
14. Chiu, M.-H. (2007). A national survey of students' conceptions of chemistry in Taiwan. International Journal ofScience Education, 29(4), 421-452.
15. Cokelez, A., Dumon, A. & Taber, K. S. (2008). Upper secondary French students, chemical transformations and the "register of models": A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 807-836.
16. De Vos, W. & Verdonk, A. H. (1985). A new road to reactions. Journal ofChemical Education, 62(3), 238-240.
17. El Bilani, R. (2007). "Nature des connaissances mises en jeu par les eleves et les enseignants lors de l'utilisation des TICE en chimie: Cas de la reaction chimique dans l'enseignement secondaire." Doctoral thesis, Universite Lumiere Lyon 2, Lyon.
18. Gabel, D. L., Samuel, K. V. & Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal ofChemical Education, 64(8), 695-697.
19. Gopal, H., Kleinsmidt, J., Case, J. & Musonge, P. (2004). An investigation of tertiary students' understanding of evaporation, condensation and vapour pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1597-1620.
20. Hesse, J. J. & Anderson, C. W. (1992). Students' conceptions of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3), 277-299.
21. Kelly, R. M. & Jones, L. L. (2007). Exploring how different features of animations of sodium chloride dissolution affect students'explanations. Journal ofScience Education and Technology, 16(5), 413-429.
22. Khanfour-Armale, R. (2008). "Structuration par le professeur des connaissances construites par des eleves ayant travaille en autonomie lors d'une activite experimental de chimie." Doctoral thesis, Universite Lumiere Lyon 2, Lyon.
23. Kozma, R. B. & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949-968.
24. Krnel, D., Watson, R. & Glazar, S. A. (1998). Survey of research related to the development of the concept of 'matter'. International Journal ofScience Education, 20(3), 257-289.
25. Le Marechal, J.-F. (1999). Modelling student's cognitive activity during resolution of problems based on experimental facts in chemical education. In J. Leach & A. C. Paulsen (Eds.), Practical work in science education - Recent research studies (pp. 195-209). Denmark, Frederiksberg: Roskilde University Press/Holland, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26. Mulford, D. R. & Robinson, W. R. (2002). An inventory for alternate conceptions among first- semester general chemistry students. Journal ofChemical Education, 79(6), 739-744.
27. Nahum, T. L., Naaman, R. M., Hofstein, A. & Krajcik, J. (2007). Developing a new teaching approach for the chemical bonding concept aligned with current scientific and pedagogical knowledge. Science Education, 91(4), 579-603.
28. Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don't learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196.
29. Novick, S. & Nussbaum, J. (1981). Pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A cross-age study. Science Education, 65(2), 187-196.
30. Pekdag, B. (2005). "Influence des relations entre le texte et l'image d'un film de chimie sur l'activite cognitive d'un apprenant." Doctoral thesis, Universite Lumiere Lyon 2, Lyon.
31. Pekdag, B. & Le Marechal, J.-F. (2007). Memorisation of information from scientific movies. In R. Pinto & D. Couso (Eds.), Contributions from science education research (pp. 199-210). Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer.
32. Pfundt, H. (1981). Pre-instructional conceptions about substances and transformations of substances. In W. Jung, H. Pfundt & C. von Rhoneck (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe international workshop on problems concerning students' representation of physics and chemistry knowledge (pp. 320-341). Pedagogische Hochschule, Ludwigsburg.
33. Sallaberry, J.-C. (2000). Coordination des "representations image" et des representations rationnelles dans la construction du concept d'element chimique. Didaskalia, 17, 101-121.
34. Sanger, M. J. & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997). Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic, and concentration cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 377-398.
35. Sanmarti, N., Izquierdo, M. & Watson, R. (1995). The substantialisation of properties in pupils' thinking and in the history of science. Science & Education, 4(4), 349-369.
36. Schmidt, H.-J. & Volke, D. (2003). Shift of meaning and students' alternative concepts. International Journal ofScience Education, 25(11), 1409-1424.
37. Sensevy, G., Tiberghien, A., Santini, J., Laube, S. & Griggs, P. (2008). An epistemological approach to modeling: Cases studies and implications for science teaching. Science Education, 92(3), 424-446.
38. Sozbilir, M. & Bennett, J. M. (2007). A study of Turkish chemistry undergraduates' understanding of entropy. Journal ofChemical Education, 84(7), 1204-1208.
39. Stains, M. & Talanquer, V. (2008). Classification of chemical reactions: Stages of expertise. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 45(7), 771-793.
40. Stavridou, H. & Solomonidou, C. (1989). Physical phenomena - chemical phenomena: Do pupils make the distinction? International Journal ofScience Education, 11(1), 83-92.
41. Stavridou, H. & Solomonidou, C. (1998). Conceptual reorganization and the construction of the chemical reaction concept during secondary education. International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 205-221.
42. Stefani, C. & Tsaparlis, G. (2009). Students' levels of explanations, models, and misconceptions in basic quantum chemistry: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(5), 520-536.
43. Talanquer, V. (2006). Commonsense chemistry: A model for understanding students' alternative conceptions. Journal ofChemical Education, 83(5), 811-816.
44. Tan, K. C. D. & Taber, K. S. (2009). Ionization energy: Implications of preservice teachers' conceptions. Journal ofChemical Education, 86(5), 623-629.
45. Tiberghien, A. (1994). Modeling as a basis for analyzing teaching-learning situations. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 71-87.
46. Tiberghien, A. & Megalakaki, O. (1995) Characterization of a modelling activity for a first qualitative approach to the concept of energy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(4), 369-383.
47. Tiberghien, A., Vince, J., & Gaidioz, P. (2009). Design-based research: Case of a teaching sequence on mechanics. International Journal ofScience Education, 31(17), 2275-2314.
48. Van Driel, J. H., De Vos, W., Verloop, N., & Dekkers, H. (1998). Developing secondary students' conceptions of chemical reactions: The introduction of chemical equilibrium. International Journal ofScience Education, 20(4), 379-392.
49. Vergnaud, G. (1990). La theorie des champs conceptuels. Recherches en Didactiquedes Mathematiques, 10(2), 133-170.
50. Wu, H.-K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821-842.