Sperm accessory microtubules suggest the placement of Diplura as the sister-group of Insecta s.s.

Arthropod Structure and Development

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 77-92

  Dallai, Romano ^a   Mercati, David ^a   Carapelli, Antonio ^a   Nardi, Francesco ^a   Machida, Ryuichiro ^b   Sekiya, Kaoru ^b   Frati, Francesco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Hexapod sperm structure; Sperm phylogeny; Sperm ultrastructure

Indexed keywords

ACCESSORY SEX ORGAN; ARTICLE; CAMPODEIDAE; CELL NUCLEUS; INSECT; JAPYX SOLIFUGUS; MALE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM; METAJAPYX BRAUERI; MICROTUBULE; MITOCHONDRION; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OCCASJAPYX JAPONICUS; PHYLOGENY; SPERM; SPERMATOGENESIS; STAINING; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; GENITALIA, MALE; INSECT PROTEINS; INSECTS; MALE; MICROTUBULES; PHYLOGENY; SPERMATOGENESIS; SPERMATOZOA;

CAMPODEA; CAMPODEIDAE; COLLEMBOLA; DIPLURA (HEXAPODS); HEXAPODA; INSECTA; JAPYGIDAE; JAPYX; JAPYX SOLIFUGUS; METAJAPYX; OCCASJAPYX JAPONICUS; PROTURA;

EID: 78649775107     PISSN: 14678039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2010.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alberti G. Zur Feinstruktur der Spermien und Spermiocytogenese der Milben (Acari). II. Actinotrichida. Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere 1980, 104:144-203.
2. Baccetti B., Dallai R. The spermatozoon of Arthropoda. XXI. New accessory tubule patterns in the sperm tail of Diplura. Journal de Microscopie 1973, 16:341-344.
3. Bareth C. Biologie sexuelle et formation endocrines de Campodea remyi Denis (Diploures Campodéidés). Revue d'Ecologie et de Biologie du Sol 1968, V(3):309-426.
4. Bareth C. An ultrastructural study of the spermatids of Campodea remyi Denis (Diplura Campodea) at the bundle stage. Cell Tissue Research 1974, 149:555-566.
5. Berlese A. Monografia dei Myrientomata. Redia 1909, 6:1-182.
6. Beutel R.G., Gorb S.N. A revised interpretation of attachment structures in Hexapoda with special emphasis on Mantophasmatodea. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 2006, 64:3-25.
7. Bilinski S. The ovary of Entognatha. The insect ovary: ultrastructure previtellogenic growth and evolution 1994, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 7-30. J. Büning (Ed.).
8. Birkhead T.R., Hosken D.J., Pitnick S. Sperm Biology: an Evolutionary Perspective 2009, Academic Press.
9. Bitsch C., Bitsch J. Phylogenetic relationships of basal hexapods among the mandibulate arthropods: a cladistic analysis based on comparative morphological characters. Zoologica Scripta 2004, 33:511-550.
10. Büning J. The ovariole: structure, type, and phylogeny. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates: Insecta 1998, vol. 11C:897-932. Wiley-Liss, New York. F.W. Harrison, M. Locke (Eds.).
11. Cameron S.L., Miller K.B., D'Haese C., Whiting M.F., Barker S.C. Mitochondrial genome data alone are not enough to unambiguously resolve the relationships of Entognatha, Insecta and Crustacea sensu lato (Arthropoda). Cladistics 2004, 20:534-557.
12. Carapelli A., Nardi F., Dallai R., Boore J.L., Liò P., Frati F. Relationships between hexapods and crustaceans based on four mitochondrial genes. Crustacean Issues 2005, 16:295-306.
13. Carapelli A., Nardi F., Dallai R., Frati F. A review of molecular data for the phylogeny of basal hexapods. Pedobiologia 2006, 20:191-204.
14. Carapelli A., Liò P., Nardi F., van der Wath E., Frati F. Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial protein coding genes confirms the reciprocal paraphyly of Hexapoda and Crustacea. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2007, 7:S8.
15. Cook C.E., Yue Q., Akam M. Mitochondrial genomes suggest that hexapods and crustaceans are mutually paraphyletic. Proceedings of the Royal Society 2005, B272:1295-1304.
16. Dallai R. The spermatozoon of Arthropoda. XI. Further observations on Collembola. Comparative Spermatology 1970, 276-279. Academic Press, New York-London. B. Baccetti (Ed.).
17. Dallai R. Recent finding on pterygotan sperm structure. Acta Zoologica Fennica 1994, 195:23-27.
18. Dallai R., Afzelius B.A. Microtubular diversity in insect spermatozoa. Results obtained with a new fixative. Journal of Structural Biology 1990, 103:164-179.
19. Dallai R., Afzelius B.A. Development of the accessory tubules of insect sperm flagella. Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology and Pathology 1992, 25:499-504.
20. Dallai R., Afzelius B.A. Accessory microtubules in insect spermatozoa: structure, function and phylogenetic significance. The Male Gamete. From Basic Science to Clinical Applications 1999, 333-350. Coche River Press, Vienna. C. Gagnon (Ed.).
21. Dallai R., Xué L., Yin W.Y. Flagellate spermatozoa of Protura (Insecta, Apterygota) are motile. International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology 1992, 21:137-148.
22. Dallai R., Fanciulli P.P., Frati F., Paccagnini E., Lupetti P. Membrane specializations in the spermatozoa of collembolan insects. Journal of Structural Biology 2003, 142:311-318.
23. Dallai R., Lupetti P., Mencarelli C. Unusual axonemes of hexapod spermatozoa. International Review of Cytology 2006, 254:45-99.
24. Dallai R., Machida R., Yoshie J., Frati F., Lupetti P. The sperm structure of Embioptera (Insecta) and phylogenetic considerations. Zoomorphology 2007, 126:53-59.
25. Dallai R., Zizzari Z.V., Fanciulli P.P. Fine structure of the spermatheca and of the accessory glands in Orchesella villosa (Collembola, Hexapoda). Journal of Morphology 2008, 269:464-478.
26. Dallai R., Zizzari Z.V., Fanciulli P.P. The ultrastructure of the spermathecae in the Collembola Symphypleona (Hexapoda). Journal of Morphology 2008, 269:1122-1133.
27. Dallai R., Zizzari Z.V., Fanciulli P.P. Different sperm number in the spermatophores of Orchesella villosa (Geoffroy) (Entomobryidae) and Allacma fusca (L.) (Sminthuridae). Arthtropod Structure and Development 2009, 38:227-324.
28. Dallai R., Mercati D., Bu Y., Yin Y.W., Callaini G., Riparbelli M.G. The spermatogenesis and sperm structure of Acerentomon microrhinus (Protura, Hexapoda) with considerations on the phylogenetic position of the taxon. Zoomorphology 2010, 129:61-80.
29. Dell'Ampio E., Szucsich N., Carapelli A., Frati F., Steiner G., Steinacher A., Pass G. Testing for misleading effects in the phylogenetic reconstruction of ancient lineages of hexapods: influence of character dependence and character choice in analyses of 28S rRNA sequences. Zoologica Scripta 2009, 38:155-170.
30. Delsuc F., Phillips M.J., Penny D. Comment on " Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic?" Science 2003, 301:1482d.
31. Dunger W. Protura, Collembola, Diplura, Archaeognatha, Zygentoma. Lehrbuch der speziellen Zoologie 2003, 66-108. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg-Berlin. A. Kaestner (Ed.).
32. Edgecombe G.D. Arthropod phylogeny: an overview from the perspectives of morphology, molecular data and the fossil record. Arthropod Structure & Development 2010, 39:74-87.
33. Gagnon C. The Male Gamete: From Basic Science to Clinical Applications 1999, Cache River Press, Vienna.
34. Giribet G., Edgecombe G.D., Carpenter G.M., D'Haese C.A., Wheeler W.C. Is Ellipura monophyletic? A combined analysis of basal hexapods relationships with emphasis in the origin of insects. Organism, Diversity and Evolution 2004, 4:319-340.
35. Giribet G., Richter S., Edgecombe G.D., Wheeler W.C. The position of crustaceans within the Arthropoda - evidence from nine molecular loci. Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships 2005, 307-352. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton. S. Koenemann, R.A. Jenner (Eds.).
36. Grassé P.P. Traité de Zoologie. Insectes, Tome IX 1949, Masson et Cie, Paris.
37. Grassi B. I progenitori dei Miriapodi e degli Insetti. Memoria VII. Anatomia comparata dei Tisanuri e considerazioni generali sull'organizzazione degli Insetti. Memorie dell'Accademia dei Lincei 1888, 4:543-606.
38. Grimaldi D.A. 400 million years on six legs: on the origin and early evolution of Hexapoda. Arthropod Structure and Development 2010, 39:191-203.
39. Hassanin A., Leger N., Deutsch J. Evidence for multiple reversals of asymmetric mutational constraints during the evolution of the mitochondrial genome of metazoa, and consequences for phylogenetic interference. Systematic Biology 2005, 54:277-298.
40. Imms A.D. A General Text of Entomology 1973, Chapman & Hall, London.
41. Jamieson B.G.M. The Ultrastructure and Phylogeny of Insect Spermatozoa 1987, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Jamieson B.G.M., Ausio J., Justine J.-L. Advances in Spermatozoal Phylogeny and Taxonomy 1995, Mémories du Muséum National d'Historie Naturelle, Paris.
43. Jamieson B.G.M., Dallai R., Afzelius B.A. Insects. Their Spermatozoa and Phylogeny 1999, Scientific Publishers, New Hampshire.
44. Kjer K.M., Carle F.L., Litman J., Ware J. A molecular phylogeny of Insecta. Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny 2006, 64:35-44.
45. Klann A., Bird T., Peretti A.V., Gromov A.V., Alberti G. Ultrastructure of spermatozoa of Solifuges (Arachnida, Solifugae): possible characters for their phylogeny?. Tissue Cell 2009, 41:91-103.
46. Klass K.D., Kristensen N.P. The ground plan and affinities of hexapods: recent progress and open problems. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N.S.) 2001, 37:265-298.
47. Koch M. Monophyly and phylogenetic position of the Diplura (Hexapoda). Pedobiology 1997, 41:9-12.
48. Koch M. Mandibular mechanisms and the evolution of hexapods. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N.S.) 2001, 37:129-174.
49. Koch M. Diplura. Encyclopedia of Insects 2009, 281-284. Academic Press. second ed. H. Resh, R.T. Cardé (Eds.).
50. Kristensen N.P. Phylogeny of insect orders. Annual Revue of Entomology 1981, 26:135-157.
51. Kukalova-Peck J. New Carboniferous Diplura, Monura and Thysanura, the hexapod groundplan, and the role of thoracic side lobes in the origin of wings (Insecta). Canadian Journal of Zoology 1987, 65:2327-2345.
52. Luan Y., Mallatt J.M., Xie R., Yanng Y., Yin W.Y. The phylogenetic position of three basal-hexapod groups (Protura, Diplura and Collembola) based on ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005, 22:1579-1592.
53. Machida R. Evidence from embryology for reconstructing the relationships of hexapod basal clades. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 2006, 64:95-104.
54. Manton S.M. The Arthropoda 1977, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
55. Nardi F., Spinsanti G., Boore J.L., Carapelli A., Dallai R., Frati F. Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic?. Science 2003, 299:1887-1889.
56. Nardi F., Spinsanti G., Boore J.L., Carapelli A., Dallai R., Frati F. Response to comment on " Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic?" Science 2003, 301:1482.
57. Negrisolo E., Minelli A., Valle G. The mitochondrial genome of the house centipede Scutigera and the monophyly versus paraphyly of Myriapods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004, 21:770-780.
58. Pagés J. Données sur la biologie de Dipljapyx humberti (Grassi). Revue d'Ecologie et de Biologie du Sol 1967, IV(2):187-281.
59. Pagés J. Notes sur des Diploures Rhabdoures (Insectes, Aptérygotes), 1 - Diplura Genavensia XXII. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 1997, 104:869-896.
60. Regier J.C., Shultz J.W., Kambic R.E. Phylogeny of basal hexapods lineages and estimates of divergence times. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 2004, 97:411-419.
61. Regier J.C., Shultz J.W., Zwick A., Hussey A., Ball B., Wetzer R., Martin J.W., Cunningham C.W. Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature 2010, 463:1079-1083.
62. Schaller F. Die " Copula" der Collembolen (Springschwänze). Naturwissenschaften 1952, 39:48.
63. Schaller F. Indirekte Spermatophorenübertragung bei Campodea (Apterygota, Diplura). Naturwissenschaften 1954, 41:406-407.
64. Szucsich N.U., Pass G. Incongruent phylogenetic hypotheses and character conflicts in morphology: the root and early branches of the hexapodan tree. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für allgemeine und angewandte Entomologie 2008, 16:415-429.
65. Štys P., Bilinski S. Ovariole types and the phylogeny of hexapods. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1990, 65:401-429.
66. von Reumont B.M., Meusemann K., Szucsich N.U., Dell'Ampio E., Gowry-Shankar V., Bartel D., Simon S., Letsch H., Stocsitis R.R., Luan Y., Wägele J.W., Pass G., Hadrys H., Misof B. Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2009, 9:119.
67. Wingstrand K.G. Comparative Spermatology of a Pentastomid, Raillietiella hemidactyli, and a Crustacean, Argulus foliaceus, with a Discussion of Pentastomid Relationships 1972, Munksgaard, Copenhagen.
68. Zrzavý J., Hypša V., Tiez D.F. Myzostomida are not Annelids: molecular and morphological support for a clade of animals with anterior sperm flagella. Cladistics 2001, 17:170-198.