Feminist Creativities and the Disciplinary Imaginary of International Relations

International Political Sociology

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 380-400

  Soreanu, Raluca ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649772074     PISSN: 17495679     EISSN: 17495687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00112.x     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Abbott, Andrew. (2001) The Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
2. Abbott, Andrew. (2004) Academic Intellectuals. In The Dialogical Turn: New Roles for Sociology in the Postdisciplinary Age, edited by C. Camic and H. Joas Lanham, MD: Rowman.
3. Ackerly, Brooke, Maria Stern, and Jacqui True, Eds. (2006) Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Adler, Emanuel. (1997) Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relation 3 (3): 319-363.
5. Agathangelou, Anna M., and L. H. M. Ling (2004) The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review 6 (4): 21-49.
6. Ahmed, Sara. (2000) Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-coloniality. London: Routledge.
7. Ashworth, Lucian M. (2002) Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? A Revisionist History of International Relations. International Relations 16 (1): 33-51.
8. Atkinson, Jane Monnig. (1982) Review Essay: Anthropology. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 8 (2): 232-258.
9. Bachelard, Gaston. (1984) The New Scientific Spirit, translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Boston: Beacon Press.
10. Benhabib, Seyla. (1999) Sexual Difference and Collective Identities: The New Global Constellation. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 24 (2): 335-361.
11. Bourdieu, Pierre. (1984 [1979]) Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, translated by Richard Nice. London: Routledge.
12. Bourdieu, Pierre. (1988) Vive la crise! For Heterodoxy in Social Science. Theory and Society 17 (5): 773-788.
13. Bourdieu, Pierre. (1991) Epilogue: On the Possibility of a Field of World Sociology. In Social Theory for a Changing Society, edited by P. Bourdieu and J. S. Coleman Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
14. Bourdieu, Pierre. (1993 [1983]) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
15. Bourdieu, Pierre. (1999 [1975]) The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason. In The Science Studies Reader, edited by M. Biagioli New York: Routledge.
16. Bourdieu, Pierre. (2004) The Science of Science and Reflexivity, translated by Richard Nice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Butler, Judith. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.
18. Calhoun, Craig. (1996) The Rise and Domestication of Historical Sociology. In The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, edited by T. J. McDonald Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19. Calhoun, Craig, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen (2007) Orthodoxy, Heterodoxy, and Hierarchy: "Mainstream" Sociology and Its Challengers. In Sociology in America: A History, edited by C. Calhoun Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Caprioli, Mary. (2004) Feminist IR Theory and Quantitative Methodology: A Critical Analysis. International Studies Review 6 (2): 253-269.
21. Carr, Edward H. (1964) The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939. New York: Harper and Row.
22. Carver, Terrell. (2004) War of the Worlds/Invasion of the Body Snatchers. International Affairs 80 (1): 92-94.
23. Chafetz, Janet. (1993) Sociological Theory: A Case of a Multiple Personality Disorder. Perspectives: The Theory Section Newsletter 6 (2): 60-63.
24. Checkel, Jeffrey T. (1998) The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics 50 (2): 324-348.
25. Connell, Robert W. (1997) Why Is Classical Theory Classical. The American Journal of Sociology 102 (6): 1511-1557.
26. Crawford, Robert M. A. (2000) Idealism and Realism in International Relations: Beyond the Discipline. London: Routledge.
27. Cusset, François. (2003) French Theory: Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze & Cie et les mutations de la vie intellectuelle aux États-Unis. Paris: La Découverte.
28. Daston, Lorraine. (1992) Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective. Social Studies of Science 22 (4): 597-618.
29. Der Derian, James. (1989) The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations. In International/Intertextual Relations, edited by J. Der Derian, and M. J. Shapiro New York: Lexington Books.
30. Enloe, Cynthia. (1989) Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Relations. London: Pandora Press.
31. Enloe, Cynthia. (2001) Interview with Professor Cynthia Enloe. Review of International Studies 27 (4): 649-666.
32. Foucault, Michel. (1970) The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock.
33. Fox Keller, Evelyn. (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
34. Fuller, Steve. (2005) The Intellectual: The Positive Power of Negative Thinking. Cambridge: Icon Books.
35. George, Jim, and David Campbell (1990) Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 269-293.
36. Gieryn, Thomas F. (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Guillory, John. (1995) Canon. In Critical Terms for Literary Study, edited by F. Lentricchia, and T. McLaughlin Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Gunnell, John G. (1978) The Myth of the Tradition. American Political Science Review 72 (1): 122-134.
39. Haraway, Donna. (1999) Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. In Feminism & Science, edited by E. Fox Keller, and H. E. Longino Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Hobden, Stephen. (2002) What's at Stake in Bringing Historical Sociology Back to International Relations? Transcending Chronofetishism and Tempocentrism in International Relations. In The Historical Sociology of International Relations, edited by S. Hobden, and J. M. Hobson Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Hooks, Bell. (1984) Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.
42. Hooks, Bell. (1999) Ain't I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End Press.
43. Hopf, Ted. (1998) The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security 23 (1): 171-200.
44. Jeffery, Renée. (2005) Tradition as Invention: The "Traditions Tradition" and the History of Ideas in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34 (1): 57-84.
45. Jones, Adam. (1996) Does Gender Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies 22 (4): 405-429.
46. Kahler, Miles. (1997) International Relations: Still an American Social Science? In Ideas and Ideals: Essays on Politics in Honour of Stanley Hoffman, edited by L. B. Miller, and M. J. Smith Boulder, CO: Westview.
47. Kelly-Gadol, Joan. (1977) Did Women Have a Renaissance?. In Becoming Visible: Women in European History, edited by R. Bridenthal, and C. Koontz Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
48. Keohane, Robert O. (1986) Realism, Neorealism and the Study of World Politics. In Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by R. O. Keohane New York: Columbia University Press.
49. Keohane, Robert O. (1989) International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint. Millennium: Jounal of International Studies 18 (2): 245-253.
50. Keohane, Robert O. (1998) Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations between International Relations and Feminist Theory. International Studies Quarterly 42 (1): 193-198.
51. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Lacan, Jacques. (1966) Écrits. Paris: Seuil.
53. Lacan, Jacques. (1991 [1975]) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book 1: Freud's Papers on Technique 1953-1954, edited by J.-A. Miller, translated by John Forrester. New York: W.W. Norton.
54. Lakatos, Imre. (1970) Falsification and the Methodology of Science Research Programs. In Critics and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos, and A. Musgrave Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Levine, Donald N. (1995) Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.
56. Lorber, Judith. (2006) Shifting Paradigms and Challenging Categories. Social Problems 53 (4): 448-453.
57. Lowenhaupt Tsing, Anna, and Sylvia Junko Yanagisako (1983) Feminism and Kinship Theory. Current Anthropology 24 (4): 511-516.
58. McClintock, Anne. (1995) Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York: Routledge.
59. Mink, Louis O. (1966) The Autonomy of Historical Understanding. In Philosophical Analysis and History, edited by W. H. Dray New York: Harper & Row.
60. Moghadam, Valentine M., Ed. (1994) Identity Politics and Women: Cultural Reassertions and Feminisms in an International Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview.
61. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. (1991) Introduction: Cartographies of Struggle: Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. In Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, edited by C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo, and L. Torres Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
62. Novick, Peter. (1988) That Noble Dream: The "Objectivity Question" and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Peterson, Spike V. (1992) Gendered States: Feminist. (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory. New York: Lynne Rienner.
64. Peterson, Spike V. (2004) Feminist Theories Within, Invisible to and beyond IR. Brown Journal of World Affaires 10 (2): 35-45.
65. Popper, Karl R. (1968) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper and Row.
66. Quirk, Joel, and Darshan Vigneswaran (2005) The Construction of an Edifice: The Story of a First Great Debate. Review of International Studies 31 (1): 89-107.
67. Schmidt, Brian C. (2002a) On the History and Historiography of International Relations. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B. A. Simmons London: Sage.
68. Schmidt, Brian C. (2002b) Anarchy, World Politics and the Birth of a Discipline: American International Relations, Pluralist Theory and the Myth of Interwar Idealism. International Relations 16 (1): 9-31.
69. Shapiro, Michael J. (1989) Textualising Global Politics. In International/Intertextual Relations, edited by J. Der Derian, and M. J. Shapiro New York: Lexington Books.
70. Smith, Steve. (1995) The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory. In International Relations Theory Today, edited by K. Booth, and S. Smith Cambridge: Polity Press.
71. Somers, Margaret R. (1994) The Narrative Construction of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach. Theory and Society 23 (5): 605-649.
72. Soreanu, Raluca, and David Hudson (2008) Feminist Scholarship in International Relations and the Politics of Disciplinary Emotion. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 37 (1): 123-151.
73. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravarty. (1998) Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson, and L. Grossberg Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
74. Sprague, Joey. (1997) Holy Men and Big Guns: The Can[n]on in Social Theory. Gender & Society 11 (1): 88-107.
75. Squires, Judith, and Jutta Weldes (2007) Beyond Being Marginal: Gender and International Relations in Britain. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9 (2): 185-203.
76. Stacey, Judith, and Barrie Thorne (1985) The Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociology. Social Problems 32 (4): 301-316.
77. Steans, Jill. (2003) Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the "Mainstream" of International Relations. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5 (3): 428-454.
78. Steinmetz, George. (2005a) Positivism and Its Others in the Social Sciences. In The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others, edited by G. Steinmetz Durham: Duke University Press.
79. Steinmetz, George. (2005b) The Epistemological Unconscious of U.S. Sociology and the Transition to Post-Fordism: The Case of Historical Sociology. In Remaking Modernity: Politics, History and Sociology, edited by J. Adams, E. S. Clemens, and A. S. Orloff Durham: Duke University Press.
80. Sylvester, Christine. (1994) Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. Sylvester, Christine. (2004) Woe or Whoa! International Relations Where It's Not Supposed to Be. The Brown Journal or World Affairs 38 (2): 57-68.
82. Tickner, Ann J. (1992) Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.
83. Tickner, Ann J. (1997) You Just Don't Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly 41 (4): 611-632.
84. Tickner, Ann J. (2001) Gendering World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
85. Tickner, Ann J. (2004) The Growth and Future of Feminist Theories in International Relations. Brown Journal or World Affairs 10 (2): 47-56.
86. Tickner, Ann J. (2005a) What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions. International Studies Quarterly 49 (1): 1-21.
87. Tickner, Ann J. (2005b) Gendering a Discipline: Some Feminist Methodological Contributions to International Relations. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (4): 2173-2188.
88. Wæver, Ole. (1996) The Rise and Fall of the Interparadigm Debate. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, edited by S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski New York: Cambridge University Press.
89. Wæver, Ole. (1997) Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms. In The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making, edited by I. B. Neumann, and O. Wæver London: Routledge.
90. Walker, R. B. J. (1989) The Prince and the Pauper: Tradition, Modernity and Practice in the Theory of International Relations. In International/Intertextual Relations, edited by J. Der Derian, and M. J. Shapiro New York: Lexington Books.
91. Weber, Cynthia. (1994) Good Girls, Little Girls, and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane's Critique of Feminist International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23 (2): 337-349.
92. Weber, Cynthia. (1999) IR: The Resurrection of New Frontiers of Incorporation. European Journal of International Relations 5 (4): 435-450.
93. Wendt, Alexander. (1992) Anarchy Is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46 (2): 391-425.
94. White, Hayden. (1984) The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory. History and Theory 23 (1): 1-33.
95. Wobbe, Theresa. (1996) On the Horizons of a New Discipline: Early Women Sociologists in Germany. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 26 (3): 283-289.
96. Youngs, Gillian. (2004) Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and gender are Essential to Understanding the World "We" Live in." International Affairs 80 (1): 75-87.
97. Zalewski, Marysia. (1995) "Well What Is the Feminist Perspective on Bosnia?" International Affairs 71 (2): 339-356.
98. Zalewski, Marysia. (1996) All These Theories yet the Bodies Keep Piling Up. In International Theory: Positivism and After, edited by S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99. Zalewski, Marysia. (2006) Distracted Reflections on the Production, Narration, and Refusal of Feminist Knowledge in International Relations. In Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, edited by B. Ackerly, M. Stern, and J. True Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. Zalewski, Marysia. (2007) Do We Understand Each Other Yet? Troubling Feminist Encounters with International Relations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9 (2): 302-312.
101. ŽIžek, Slavoj. (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology. New York: Verso.