School science and citizenship: Whose science and whose citizenship?

Curriculum Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 197-211

  Jenkins, Edgar W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Citizenship; School science; Science Technology Society (STS) movement; Socio political action

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649727047     PISSN: 09585176     EISSN: 14693704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09585170600909647     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. AAAS. 1989. Science for all Americans, Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
2. AAAS. 1994a. Project 2061: Science for all Americans, New York: Oxford University Press.
3. AAAS. 1994b. Project 2061: Benchmarks for Science Literacy, New York: Oxford University Press.
4. AEC. 1935. Education for citizenship in secondary schools, London: Association for Education in Citizenship.
5. Aikenhead, G. S., 2006. Science education for everyday life: evidence-based practice, New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Atkin, J. M., and Helms, J., 1993. Getting serious about priorities in science education. Studies in Science Education, 21: 1–20.
7. BAAS. 1856. Report of the Annual Meeting, London: Murray.
8. BAAS. 1918. Report of the Annual Meeting, London: Murray.
9. BAAS. 1923. Report of the Annual Meeting, London: Murray.
10. BAAS. 1927. Report of the Annual Meeting, London: Murray.
11. Barton, A. C., 2002. Urban science education studies: a commitment to equity, social justice and a sense of place. Studies in Science Education, 38: 1–38.
12. Brimble, L. J. F., 1942. Biology as a social science. School Science Review, 23 (91): 341
13. Carson, R., 1962. Silent spring, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14. Donnelly, J. F., 2004. Humanizing science education. Science Education, 88: 762–784.
15. Duschle, R., 1988. Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education. Science Education, 72 (1): 51–62.
16. Fensham, P. J., 2006. “ Beyond knowledge: other outcome qualities for science education ”. In Science and technology education for a diverse world: dilemmas, needs, partnerships, Edited by: Janiuk, R. J., and Samonek-Miciuk, E., 223–237. Lublin: Maria Curie-Sklodowska University Press.
17. Hill, A. V., 1933. International status and obligations of science. Nature, 132: 952–954.
18. Hogben, L., 1942. Biological instruction and education for citizenship. School Science Review, 23 (91): 263–281.
19. Hurd, P. D., 1997. Inventing science education for the new millennium, New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Huxley, T. H., 1877. Physiography: an introduction to the study of nature, London: Macmillan.
21. Jenkins, E. W., 1979. From Armstrong to Nuffield: studies in twentieth century school science education in England and Wales, London: Murray.
22. Jenkins, E. W., ed. 1997. Innovations in science and technology education, Vol. VI, Paris: UNESCO.
23. Jenkins, E. W., and Pell, R. G., 2006. The Relevance of Science Education Project (ROSE) in England: a summary of findings, Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
24. Layton, D., 1973. Science for the people: the origins of the school science curriculum in England, London: Allen & Unwin.
25. Layton, D., 1993. “ Science education and praxis: the relationship of school science to practical action ”. In School science and technology: some issues and perspectives, Edited by: Jenkins, E. W., 118–159. Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
26. Layton, D., 1994. “ STS in the school curriculum: a movement overtaken by history? ”. In STS education: international perspectives on reform, Edited by: Solomon, J., and Aikenhead, G., 32–46. New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Lee, S., and Roth, W. -M., 2002. “ Breaking the spell: science education in a free society ”. In Science education as/for sociopolitical action, Edited by: Roth, W. -M., and Désautels, J., 37–66. New York: Peter Lang.
28. Lockhard, D. J., ed. 1972. Eighth Report of the International Clearinghouse on Science and Mathematics Curricular Developments 1972, Maryland: Commission on Science Education of the AAAS /Science Teaching Center, University of Maryland.
29. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., and Behrens, W. W., 1972. The limits to growth, Washington, DC: Potomac Associates.
30. Millar, R., and Osborne, J., eds. 1998. Beyond 2000: science education for the future. Report of a seminar series funded by the Nuffield Foundation, London: King's College London School of Education.
31. Norwood, C., 1932. Presidential address. School Science Review, 13 (51): 169–186.
32. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., and Gibbons, M., 2001. Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity.
33. NSTA. 1990. Position paper on STS. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 10 (5, 6): 249–250.
34. Posch, P., 1993. Research issues in environmental education. Studies in Science Education, 21: 21–48.
35. Ravetz, J. R., 1990. The merger of knowledge with power: essays in critical science, London: Mansell.
36. Ravetz, J. R., 2005. No-nonsense guide to science, Oxford: New Internationalist Publications.
37. Redner, H., 1987. The ends of science: an essay in scientific authority, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
38. Rogoff, B., 1990. Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Roth, W. -M., 1998. Designing communities, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
40. Roth, W. -M., and Barton, A. C., 2004. Rethinking scientific literacy, New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
41. Roth, W. -M., and Désautels, J., eds. 2002. Science education as/for sociopolitical action, New York: Peter Lang.
42. Royal Society. 1985. The public understanding of science, London: The Royal Society.
43. Schreiner, C., and Sjøberg, S., 2004. ROSE: the Relevance of Science Education. A comparative study of students' views of science and science education, Oslo: Department of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo.
44. Solomon, J., 1983. Science in a Social Context (SISCON)—in schools, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
45. Solomon, J., 1992. The classroom discussion of science-based social issues presented on television: knowledge, attitudes and values. International Journal of Science Education, 14 (4): 431–444.
46. Solomon, J., 1994. “ Conflict between mainstream science and STS in science education ”. In STS education: international perspectives on reform, Edited by: Solomon, J., and Aikenhead, G., 3–10. New York: Teachers College Press.
47. Solomon, J., 1997. New science education research for the new Europe?. Studies in Science Education, 29: 93–124.
48. Solomon, J., and Aikenhead, G., eds. 1994. STS education: international perspectives on reform, New York: Teachers College Press.
49. Stinner, A., 1995. Contextual settings, science, stories and large context problems: towards a more humanistic science education. Science Education, 79 (5): 555–581.
50. Tate, W., 2001. Science education as a civil right: urban schools and opportunity-to-learn considerations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (9): 1015–1028.
51. Thier, H., and Hill, J., 1988. Chemical Education in Schools and the Community: the CEPUP project. International Journal of Science Education, 10 (4): 421–430.
52. Wang, H. A., and Marsh, D. O., 2002. Science instruction with a human twist: teachers' perception and practice using the history of science in classrooms. Science and Education, 11 (2): 169–189.
53. Watts, M., and Bentley, D., 1994. Humanizing and feminizing school science: reviving anthropomorphic and animistic thinking in constructivist science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16 (1): 83–97.
54. Weingart, P., 1978. “ The relations between science and technology ”. In Dynamics of science and technology, Edited by: Krohn, W., Layton, E., and Weingart, P., Dordecht: Reidel.
55. Ziman, J., 1980. Teaching and learning about science and society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Ziman, J., 1984. An introduction to science studies: the philosophical and social aspects of science and technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.