Humanizing science education

Science Education

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 762-784

  Donnelly, James F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4644350983     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20004     Document Type: Review

References (104)

1. Abrams, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York: Vintage.
2. Aikenhead, G. S. (1994). The social contract of science: Implications for teaching science. In J. Solomon & G. S. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education. International perspectives on reform (pp. 11-20). New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the sub-culture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1-52.
4. Albone, E., Collins, N., & Hill, T. (1995). Scientific research in schools. A compendium of practical experience. Bristol: Clifton Scientific.
5. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1964). Science-a process approach. Washington: AAAS.
6. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). The liberal art of science. Washington: DC: AAAS.
7. Association for Science Education. (1971). Science and general education. Education in Science, 8(41), 31-32.
8. Bencze, J. L. (2000). Democratic constructivist science education: Enabling egalitarian literacy and self-actualization. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 847-865.
9. Berlin, I. (1997). The divorce between the sciences and the humanities. In R. Hausheer (Ed.), The proper study of mankind (pp. 326-358). New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
10. Black, M. (1975). Some tasks for the humanities. In W. R. Niblett (Ed.), The sciences, the humanities and the technological threat (pp. 79-90). London: University of London Press.
11. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. London: Longman.
12. Bridges, D. (Ed.). (1997). Education, autonomy and democratic citizenship. London: Routledge.
13. Brown, J. R. (2001). Who rules in science? An opinionated guide to the wars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Carson, R. N. (1997). Why science education alone is not enough. Interchange, 28, 109-120.
17. Cobern, W. W. (Ed.). (1998). Socio-cultural perspectives on science education: An international dialogue. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Council for Science and Technology. (1998). School science: Fit for the future? London: CST.
19. Crane, R. (1967). The idea of the humanities. In the idea of the humanities (pp. 3-15). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.
21. DEA & ASE. (2003). Science: The global dimension. London: DEA/ASE.
22. DES/WO. (1989). Science in the national curriculum. London: DES/WO.
23. DfEE. (1999). The national curriculum for England. London: DfEE/QCA.
24. Donnelly, J. (1999). Interpreting differences: The educational aims of teachers of science and history, and their implications. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 17-41.
25. Donnelly, J. (2002). The 'humanist' critique of the place of science in the curriculum in the nineteenth century, and its continuing legacy. History of Education, 31(6), 535-555.
26. Donnelly, J., Buchan, A., Jenkins, E. W., Laws, P., & Welford, G. (1996). Investigations by order. Driffield: Studies in Education.
27. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
28. Duschl, R. (1988). Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education. Science Education, 72(1), 51-62.
29. Elgin, C. P. (1999). Considered judgement. Princeton NJ: Princeton UP.
30. Elliott, A. (2001). Concepts of the self. Cambridge: Polity.
31. Evans, R. W. (1994). Educational ideologies and the teaching of history. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 171-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Finegold, P. (2001). Engaging the humanities. Past Sixteen Science Issues, 33, 2-3.
33. Fullick, P., & Ratcliffe, M. (1996). Teaching ethical aspects of science. Southampton: Bassett.
34. Girod, M., Rau, C., & Schepige, A. (2003). Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding. Science Education, 87(4), 574-587.
35. Goodwin, A. (2001). Wonder in science teaching and learning: An update. School Science Review, 83(302), 69-74.
36. Gough, N. (2002). Thinking/acting locally/globally: Western science and environmental education in a global knowledge economy. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1217-1237.
37. Graham, L. R. (1981). Between science and values. New York: Columbia University Press.
38. Gribble, J. (1983). Literary education: A revaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Griffin, D. R. (1988). The reenchantment of science: Postmodern proposals. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
40. Gross, P. R., Levitt, N. R., & Lewis, M. R. (Eds.). (1997). The flight from science and reason. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
41. Hadamard, J. (1954). An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York: Dover.
42. Harman, W. W. (1998). Global mind change: The promise of the 21st century. Sausalito, CA: Berret-Koehler.
43. Harman, W., & Clark, J. (1994). New metaphysical foundations of modern science. Sausalito, CA: Institute of Noetic Sciences.
44. Head, J. (1985). The personal response to science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Hirst, P. H. (1974). Liberal education and the nature of knowledge. In Knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 30-53). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
46. Hirst, P. H. (1998). Education, knowledge and practices. In P. H. Hirst & P. White (Eds.), Philosophy of education. Major themes in the analytical tradition (pp. 384-395). London: Routledge.
47. Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science. Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
48. Holton, G. (1996). Science education and the sense of self. In P. R. Gross, N. Levitt, & M. R. Lewis (Eds.), The flight from science and reason (pp. 550-560). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
49. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. (1999-2000). Third report. Science and society.
50. Huizinga, J. (1951). Homo ludens. A study of the play element in culture. London: Temple Smith.
51. Hurd, P. D. (1997). Inventing science education for the new millennium. London: Teachers College Press.
52. Huxley, T. (1904). A liberal education and where to find it. In Science and education (pp. 76-110). London: Macmillan.
53. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
54. Jarrett, J. L. (1973). The humanities and humanistic education. New York: Addison-Wesley.
55. Labinger, J. A., & Collins, H. (Eds.). (2001). The one culture?: A conversation about science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Lacey, H. (1999). Is science value free? London: Rouledge.
57. Layton, D. (1973). Science for the people. The origins of the school science curriculum in England. London: George Allen & Unwin.
58. Layton, D. (1986). Revaluing science education. In P. Tomlinson & M. Quinton (Eds.), Values across the curriculum (pp. 160-176). Lewes: Palmer.
59. Leinhardt, G. (1994). History: A time to be mindful. In G. Leinhardt, I. L. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 209-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60. Leinhardt, G., Stainton, C., & Virji, S. (1994). Learning to reason in history: Mindlessness to mindfulness. In M. Carretero, & J. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 131-158). Hove: Erlbaum.
61. Levinson, M. (1999). The demands of liberal education. Oxford: Oxford UP.
62. Loo, S. P. (2001). Islam, science and science education: Conflict or concord. Studies in Science Education, 36, 45-78.
63. Martin, J. R. (1998). Needed: A new paradigm for liberal education. In P. H. Hirst & P. White (Eds.), Philosophy of education. Major themes in the analytical tradition, Vol. I (pp. 267-283). London: Routledge.
64. Matthews, M. R. (2004). Thomas Kuhn's impact on science education: What lessons can be learned? Science Education, 88(1), 90-118.
65. Mayer, A. K. (1997). Moralizing science: The uses of science's past in national education in the 1920s. British Journal for the History of Science, 30, 51-70.
66. McComas, W. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 53-70). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
67. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College.
68. Moheno, P. B. B. (1993). Towards a fully human science education: An exploratory study of prospective science teachers' attitudes towards humanistic science education. International Journal of Science Education, 15(1), 95-106.
69. Morris, B. (1972). Arts and sciences in education. Objectives and perspectives in education (pp. 35-56). London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
70. Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1983). A common curriculum for the natural sciences. In G. D. Fenstermacher & J. I. Goodlad (Eds.), Individual differences and the common curriculum (pp. 160-185). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
71. Murdoch, I. (1977). The fire and the sun. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
72. Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
74. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
75. National Science Board. (2002). Science and engineering indicators-2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Board.
76. Newton, D. P. (1986). Humanized science teaching: What is it? School Science Review, 67(240), 457-461.
77. Nuffield Foundation. (1966). Nuffield chemistry. Introduction and guide. London: Longmans.
78. Nyiri, J. K. (1988). Tradition and practical knowledge. In J. K. Nyiri & B. Smith (Eds.), Practical knowledge. Outlines of a theory of tradition and skills (pp. 17-52). London: Croom Helm.
79. Oakeshott, M. (1989). A place of learning. In T. Fuller (Ed.), The voice of liberal learning. Michael Oakeshott on education (pp. 17-42). London: Yale University Press.
80. O'Grady, P. (2002). Relativism. Chesham: Acumen.
81. Osborne, I., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils' and parents' views of the school science curriculum. London: King's College.
82. Osborne, J., Duschl, R., & Fairbrother, R. (2002). Breaking the mould. Teaching science for public understanding. London: Nuffield Foundation.
83. Perry, R. B. (1940). A definition of the humanities. In T. M. Greene (Ed.), The meaning of the humanities (pp. 11-36). New York: Princeton University Press.
84. Phenix, P. H. (1964). Realms of meaning: A philosophy of the curriculum for general education. New York: McGraw Hill.
85. Phillips, R. (2000). Government policies, the state and the teaching of history. In J. Arthur & R. Phillips (Eds.), Issues in history teaching (pp. 10-23). London: Routledge.
86. Pike, M. A. (2003). The canon in the classroom: Students' experiences of texts from other times. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 1-16.
87. Pring, R. A. (1995). Closing the gap: Liberal education and vocational preparation. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
88. Quine, W. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge: MA, MIT Press.
89. Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (Eds.). (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. New York: Peter Lang.
90. Schiller, F. (1967). On the aesthetic education of man. In a. series of letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
91. Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1974). The structures of the life-world. London: Heinemann.
92. Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. S. (Eds.). (1994). STS education. International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
93. Songer, N. B., Lee, H.-S., & MacDonald, S. (2003). Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard. Science Education, 87(4), 490-516.
94. Stevens, P. (1978). On the Nuffield philosophy of science. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 12, 99-111.
95. Stinner, A. (1995). Contextual settings, science, stories and large context problems: Towards a more humanistic science education. Science Education, 79(5), 555-581.
96. Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the self: The making of the modem identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
97. Turner, S., & Sullenger, K. (1999). Kuhn in the classroom, Lakatos in the lab: Science educators confront the nature-of-science debate. Science, Technology and Human Values, 24(1), 5-30.
98. Wallace, J., & Louden, W. (1998). Curriculum change in science: Riding the waves of reform. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 471-486). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
99. Wang, H. A., & Marsh, D. O. (2002). Science instruction with a human twist: Teachers' perception and practice in using the history of science in classrooms. Science & Education, 11(2), 169-189.
100. Ware, S. A. (2003). Reforming the United States secondary school science curriculum. In E. W. Jenkins (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (pp. 69-94). Paris: UNESCO.
101. Watts, M. (2001). Science and poetry: Passion vs. prescription in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(2), 197-208.
102. Watts, M., & Bentley, D. (1994). Humanizing and feminizing school science: Reviving anthropomorphic and animistic thinking in constructivist science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 83-97.
103. Witz, K. G. (1996). Science with values and values for science education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(5), 597-612.
104. Woff, R. (1991). The scope of the humanities. In P. Gordon (Ed.), Teaching the humanities (pp. 12-35). London: Woburn Press.