Predicting the longer-term outcomes of total hip replacement

Journal of Rheumatology

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2573-2577

  Gandhi, Rajiv ^a   Dhotar, Herman ^a   Davey, J Roderick ^a   Mahomed, Nizar N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Comorbidity; Hip arthroplasty; Mental health; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE REGISTRY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WESTERN ONTARIO MCMASTER UNIVERSITY OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78649722927     PISSN: 0315162X     EISSN: 14992752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.100149     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Dennison E, Cooper C. Osteoarthritis: epidemiology and classification. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS, Weinblatt ME, Weisman MH, editors. Rheumatology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2003:1781-91.
2. Wiklund I, Romanus B. A comparison of quality of life before and after arthroplasty in patients who had arthrosis of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:765-9.
3. American College of Rheumatology. Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:1905-15.
4. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:111-21.
5. Field RE, Cronin MD, Singh PJ. The Oxford hip scores for primary and revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:618-22.
6. Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS. Age and waiting time as predictors of outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis. Rheumatology 2002;41:1261-7.
7. Nilsdotter AK, Petersson IF, Roos EM, Lohmander LS. Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:923-30.
8. Cushnaghan J, Coggon D, Reading I, Croft P, Byng P, Cox K, et al. Long-term outcome following total hip arthroplasty: a controlled longitudinal study. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:1375-80.
9. Shi HY, Chiu HC, Chang JK, Wang JW, Culbertson R, Khan MM. Evaluation and prediction of health-related quality of life for total hip replacement among Chinese in Taiwan. Int Orthop 2008;32:27-32.
10. Ng CY, Ballantyne JA, Brenkel IJ. Quality of life and functional outcome after primary total hip replacement. A five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:868-73.
11. Bowling A, Bond M, Jenkinson C, Lamping DL. Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used?: comparisons between the norms provided by the omnibus survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford health life survey. J Public Health Med 1999;21:255-70.
12. Hopman WM, Towheed T, Anastassiades T, Tenenhouse A, Poliquin S, Berger C, et al. Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. CMAJ 2000;163:265-71.
13. Linn BS, Linn MW, Gurel L. Cumulative illness rating scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 1968;16:622-6.
14. Miller MD, Paradis CF, Houck PR, Mazumdar S, Stack JA, Rifai AH, et al. Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Psychiatry Res 1992;41:237-48.
15. Bellamy N. WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a user's guide. London, Ontario, Canada: University of Western Ontario; 1995.
16. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833-40.
17. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
18. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993;31:247-63.
19. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994;32:40-66.
20. Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. 2nd ed. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1997:10-26.
21. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:407-15.
22. Mahomed NN, Davis AM, Hawker G, Badley E, Davey JR, Syed KA, et al. Inpatient compared with home-based rehabilitation following primary unilateral total hip or knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:1673-80.
23. Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Arostegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007;15:273-80. (Pubitemid 46249668)
24. Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bolognese JA, Seidenberg BC, Bellamy N. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2000;27:2635-41.
25. Twisk J, de Vente W. Attrition in longitudinal studies: How to deal with missing data. J Clin Epi 2002;55:329-37.
26. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13-22.
27. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Lingard EA, Losina E, Baron JA, Roos EM, Phillips CB, et al. Psychosocial and geriatric correlates of functional status after total hip replacement. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:829-35.
28. Wood GC, McLauchlan GJ. Outcome assessment in the elderly after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:398-404.