Outcome Assessment in the Elderly After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 398-404

  Wood, G C A ^a   McLauchlan, G J ^b  

^a TRAFFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL PRESTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

elderly; outcome assessment; Oxford Hip questionnaire; SF 36 questionnaire; total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COURSE EVALUATION; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HEALTH STATUS; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD HIP QUESTIONNAIRE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTAL MAIL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33646074007     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.12.062     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Lieberman J.R., and Finerman G. Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 78-A (1996) 835
2. Fitzpatrick R., Fletcher A., and Gore S. Quality of Life measures in health care. I: applications and issues in assessment. BMJ 1992 (1992) 1074
3. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Murray D., et al. The problem of "noise" in monitoring patient-based outcomes: generic, disease specific and site-specific instruments for total hip replacement. J Health Serv Res Policy 1 (1996) 224
4. Dawson J., Carr A., and Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 78-B (1996) 185
5. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Murray D., et al. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care 1996 (1996) 81
6. Fitzpatrick R., Morris R., Murray D.W., et al. The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care 2000 (2000) 146
7. Garellick G., Herberts P., and Malchau H. The value of clinical data scoring systems. J Arthroplasty 14 (1999) 1024
8. Heaton J. Measuring outcomes. Shooting straight from the hip. Health Services Journal 16 (1995) 35
9. Jenkinson C., Coulter A., and Wright L. Short Form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 306 (1993) 1437
10. Katz J.N., Larson M.G., and Liang M.H. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care 30 (1992) 917
11. Keller S.D., Bayliss M.S., Ware J.E.J., et al. Comparison of responses to SF-36 Health Survey questions with one-week and four-week recall periods. Health Serv Res 32 (1997) 367
12. Lin M., and Ward J.E. Reliability of the MOS SF36 health status measure in Australian general practice. Aust Fam Physic 27 (1998) 94
13. McHorney C.A., Kosinski M., and Ware J.E.J. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 Health Survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care 32 (1994) 551
14. Perkins J.J., and Sanson-Fischer R.W. An examination of self- and telephone-administered modes of administration for the Australian SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol 51 (1998) 969
15. Ware J.E.J., and Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 51 (1998) 903
16. Ware J.E.J., and Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 51 (1998) 945
17. Ware J.E., and Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF36) 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 (1992) 473
18. Brazier J.E., Harper R., Jones N.M.B., et al. Validating the SF-36 Health Survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 305 (1992) 160
19. Garrat A.M., Ruta D.A., Abdalla M.I., et al. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?. BMJ 306 (1993) 1440
20. Ruta D.A., Abdalla M.I., Garrat A.M., et al. SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: I. Reliability in two patient based studies. Qual Health Care 32 (1994) 180
21. Hill S., Harris U., and Popay J. Is the short form (SF-36) suitable for routine health outcomes assessment in health care for older people? Evidence from preliminary work in community based health services in England. J Epedemiol Commun Health 94 (1995)
22. Hayes V., Morris J., Wolfe C., et al. The SF-36 Health Survey questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults?. Age Ageing 24 (1995) 120
23. Lyons R.A., Perry H.M., and Littlepage B.N.C. Evidence for the validity of the Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. Age Ageing 23 (1994) 182
24. Parker S.G., Peet S.M., Jagger C., et al. Quality of life in older patients. The SF-36 in practice. Age Ageing 24 (1995) 27
25. McMurray R., Heaton J., Sloper P., et al. Measurement of patient perceptions of pain and disability in relation to total hip replacement: the place of the Oxford Hip score in mixed methods. Qual Health Care 1999 (1999) 228
26. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg 54-B (1972) 61
27. Kiebzak G.M., Vain P., and Gregory A.M. SF-36 General Health Status survey to determine patient satisfaction at short-term follow-up after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 6 (1997) 169