Microarray identification of novel downstream targets of FoxD4L1/D5, a critical component of the neural ectodermal transcriptional network

Developmental Dynamics

Volumn 239, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 3467-3480

  Yan, Bo ^a   Neilson, Karen M ^a   Moody, Sally A ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

BMP signaling; Cement gland; Elf 1; Epidermis; FGF signaling; FoxD4L1.1; FoxD5; Olfactory placode

Indexed keywords

FORKHEAD TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; FORKHEAD TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR FOXD4L1 D5; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; EMBRYO; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE FUNCTION; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NEUROECTODERM; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ANIMALS; ECTODERM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 78649694379     PISSN: 10588388     EISSN: 10970177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.22485     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Bertwistle D, Walmsley ME, Read EM, Pizzey JA, Patient RK. 1996. GATA factors and the origins of adult and embryonic blood in Xenopus: responses to retinoic acid. Mech Dev 57: 199-214.
2. Blak AA, Naserke T, Weisenhorn DM, Prakash N, Partanen J, Wurst W. 2005. Expression of Fgf receptors 1, 2, and 3 in the developing mid- and hindbrain of the mouse. Dev Dyn 233: 1023-1030.
3. Bodoy S, Martin L, Zorzano A, Palacin M, Estevez R, Bertran J. 2005. Identification of LAT4, a novel amino acid transporter with system L activity. J Biol Chem 280: 12002-12011.
4. Bromley E, Knapp D, Wardle FC, Sun BI, Collins-Racie L, LaVallie E, Smith JC, Sive HL. 2004. Identification and characterisation of the posteriorly-expressed Xenopus neurotrophin receptor homolog genes fullback and fullback-like. Gene Expr Patterns 5: 135-140.
5. Christian JL, McMahon JA, McMahon AP, Moon RT. 1991. Xwnt-8, a Xenopus Wnt-1/int-1-related gene responsive to mesoderm-inducing growth factors, may play a role in ventral mesodermal patterning during embryogenesis. Development 111: 1045-1055.
6. Chung HA, Hyodo-Miura J, Nagamune T, Ueno N. 2005. FGF signal regulates gastrulation cell movements and morphology through its target NRH. Dev Biol 282: 95-110.
7. Dalgin G, Goldman DC, Donley N, Ahmed R, Eide CA, Christian JL. 2007. GATA-2 functions downstream of BMPs and CaM KIV in ectodermal cells during primitive hematopoiesis. Dev Biol 310: 454-469.
8. Delaune E, Lemaire P, Kodjabachian L. 2005. Neural induction in Xenopus requires early FGF signalling in addition to BMP inhibition. Development 132: 299-310.
9. de Souza FS, Gawantka V, Gómez AP, Delius H, Ang SL, Niehrs C. 1999. The zinc finger gene Xblimp1 controls anterior endomesodermal cell fate in Spemann's organizer. EMBO J 18: 6062- 6072.
10. Fainsod A, Steinbeisser H, De Robertis EM. 1994. On the function of BMP-4 in patterning the marginal zone of the Xenopus embryo. EMBO J. 13: 5015- 5025.
11. Ferreiro B, Skoglund P, Bailey A, Dorsky R, Harris WA. 1993. XASH1, a Xenopus homolog of achaete-scute: a proneural gene in anterior regions of the vertebrate CNS. Mech Dev 40: 25-36.
12. Fetka I, Doederlein G, Bouwmeester T. 2000. Neuroectodermal specification and regionalization of the Spemann organizer in Xenopus. Mech Dev 93: 49-58.
13. Fletcher RB, Baker JC, Harland RM. 2006. FGF8 spliceforms mediate early mesoderm and posterior neural tissue formation in Xenopus. Development 133: 1703-1714.
14. Frazzetto G, Klingbeil P, Bouwmeester T. 2002. Xenopus marginal coil (Xmc), a novel FGF inducible cytosolic coiled-coil protein regulating gastrulation movements. Mech Dev 113: 3-14.
15. Friesel R, Brown SA. 1992. Spatially restricted expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 during Xenopus development. Development 116: 1051-1058.
16. Fuentealba LC, Eivers E, Ikeda A, Hurtado C, Kuroda H, Pera EM, De Robertis EM. 2007. Integrating patterning signals: Wnt/GSK3 regulates the duration of the BMP/Smad1 signal. Cell 131: 980-993.
17. Gamse JT, Sive H. 2001. Early anteroposterior division of the presumptive neurectoderm in Xenopus. Mech Dev 104: 21-36.
18. Golub R, Adelman Z, Clementi J, Weiss R, Bonasera J, Servetnick M. 2000. Evolutionarily conserved and divergent expression of members of the FGF receptor family among vertebrate embryos, as revealed by FGFR expression patterns in Xenopus. Dev Genes Evol 210: 345-357.
19. Grow M, Neff AW, Mescher AL, King MW. 2006. Global analysis of gene expression in Xenopus hind limbs during stage-dependent complete and incomplete regeneration. Dev Dyn 235: 2667-2685.
20. Hawley SH, Wünnenberg-Stapleton K, Hashimoto C, Laurent MN, Watabe T, Blumberg BW, Cho KW. 1995. Disruption of BMP signals in embryonic Xenopus ectoderm leads to direct neural induction. Genes Dev 9: 2923-2935.
21. Heeg-Truesdell E, LaBonne C. 2006. Neural induction in Xenopus requires inhibition of Wnt-beta-catenin signaling. Dev Biol 298: 71-86.
22. Hesterberg LK, Weber K. 1983. Demonstration of three distinct calcium-binding sites in villin, a modulator of actin assembly. J Biol Chem 258: 365-369.
23. Horb ME, Thomsen GH. 1997. A vegetally localized T-box transcription factor in Xenopus eggs specifies mesoderm and endoderm and is essential for embryonic mesoderm formation. Development 124: 1689-1698.
24. Hufton AL, Vinayagam A, Suhai S, Baker JC. 2006. Genomic analysis of Xenopus organizer function. BMC Dev Biol 6: 27.
25. Itoh K, Sokol SY. 2007. Early development of epidermis and neural tissue. In: Moody SA, editor. Principles of developmental genetics. San Diego: Academic Press. p 241-258.
26. Kuroda H, Fuentealba L, Ikeda A, Reversade B, De Robertis EM. 2005. Default neural induction: neuralization of dissociated Xenopus cells is mediated by Ras/MAPK activation. Genes Dev 19: 1022-1027.
27. Lee SM, Danielian PS, Fritzsch B, McMahon AP. 1997. Evidence that FGF8 signalling from the midbrain-hindbrain junction regulates growth and polarity in the developing midbrain. Development 124: 959-969.
28. Luo T, Matsuo-Takasaki M, Lim JH, Sargent TD. 2001. Differential regulation of Dlx gene expression by a BMP morphogenetic gradient. Int J Dev Biol 45: 681-684.
29. Luo T, Lee YH, Saint-Jeannet JP, Sargent TD. 2003. Induction of neural crest in Xenopus by transcription factor AP2alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 532-537.
30. Marchal L, Luxardi G, Thomé V, Kodjabachian L. 2009. BMP inhibition initiates neural induction via FGF signaling and Zic genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 17437-17442.
31. Matsuo-Takasaki M, Matsumura M, Sasai Y. 2005. An essential role of Xenopus Foxi1a for ventral specification of the cephalic ectoderm during gastrulation. Development 132: 3885-3894.
32. Molenaar M, Roose J, Peterson J, Venanzi S, Clevers H, Destrée O. 1998. Differential expression of the HMG box transcription factors XTcf-3 and XLef-1 during early Xenopus development. Mech Dev 75: 151-154.
33. Moody SA. 1987. Fates of the blastomeres of the 16-cell stage Xenopus embryo. Dev Biol 119: 560-578.
34. Moody SA. 2000. Cell lineage analysis in Xenopus embryos. Methods Mol Biol 135: 331-347.
35. Nishimatsu S, Thomsen GH. 1998. Ventral mesoderm induction and patterning by bone morphogenetic protein heterodimers in Xenopus embryos. Mech Dev 74: 75-88.
36. Nutt SL, Dingwell KS, Holt CE, Amaya E. 2001. Xenopus Sprouty2 inhibits FGF-mediated gastrulation movements but does not affect mesoderm induction and patterning. Genes Dev 15: 1152-1166.
37. Ossipova O, Stick R, Pieler T. 2002. XSPR-1 and XSPR-2, novel Sp1 related zinc finger containing genes, are dynamically expressed during Xenopus embryogenesis. Mech Dev 115: 117-122.
38. Panitz F, Krain B, Hollemann T, Nordheim A, Pieler T. 1998. The Spemann organizer-expressed zinc finger gene Xegr-1 responds to the MAP kinase/Ets-SRF signal transduction pathway. EMBO J 17: 4414-4425.
39. Papalopulu N, Kintner C. 1993. Xenopus Distal-less related homeobox genes are expressed in the developing forebrain and are induced by planar signals. Development 117: 961-975.
40. Pearl EJ, Barker D, Day RC, Beck CW. 2008. Identification of genes associated with regenerative success of Xenopus laevis hindlimbs. BMC Dev Biol 8: 66.
41. Rogers CD, Moody SA, Casey ES. 2009. Neural induction and factors that stabilize a neural fate. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 87: 249-262.
42. Rossi CC, Hernandez-Lagunas L, Zhang C, Choi IF, Kwok L, Klymkowsky M, Artinger KB. 2008. Rohon-Beard sensory neurons are induced by BMP4 expressing non-neural ectoderm in Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 314: 351-361.
43. Rozen S, Skaletsky H. 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 132: 365-386.
44. Sabatini DM, Erdjument-Bromage H, Lui M, Tempst P, Snyder SH. 1994. RAFT1: a mammalian protein that binds to FKBP12 in a rapamycin-dependent fashion and is homologous to yeast TORs. Cell 78: 35-43.
45. Salic AN, Kroll KL, Evans LM, Kirschner MW. 1997. Sizzled: a secreted Xwnt8 antagonist expressed in the ventral marginal zone of Xenopus embryos. Development 124: 4739-4748.
46. Sasai N, Nakazawa Y, Haraguchi T, Sasai Y. 2004. The neurotrophin-receptor-related protein NRH1 is essential for convergent extension movements. Nature Cell Biol 6: 741-748.
47. Sato SM, Sargent TD. 1991. Localized and inducible expression of Xenopus-posterior (Xpo), a novel gene active in early frog embryos, encoding a protein with a 'CCHC' finger domain. Development 112: 747-753.
48. Sinner D, Kirilenko P, Rankin S, Wei E, Howard L, Kofron M, Heasman J, Woodland HR, Zorn AM. 2006. Global analysis of the transcriptional network controlling Xenopus endoderm formation. Development 133: 1955-1966.
49. Sirotkin H, Morrow B, Saint-Jore B, Puech A, Das Gupta R, Patanjali SR, Skoultchi A, Weissman SM, Kucherlapati R. 1997. Identification, characterization, and precise mapping of a human gene encoding a novel membrane-spanning protein from the 22q11 region deleted in velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Genomics 42: 245-251.
50. Sive HL, Hattori K, Weintraub H. 1989. Progressive determination during formation of the anteroposterior axis in Xenopus laevis. Cell 58: 171-180.
51. Sive HL, Grainger RM, Harland RM. 2000. Early development of Xenopus laevis, a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
52. Sölter M, Köster M, Hollemann T, Brey A, Pieler T, Knöchel W. 1999. Characterization of a subfamily of related winged helix genes, XFD-12/12'/12" (XFLIP), during Xenopus embryogenesis. Mech Dev 89: 161-165.
53. Stern CD. 2005. Neural induction: old problem, new findings, yet more questions. Development 132: 2007-2021.
54. Sullivan SA, Akers L, Moody SA. 2001. foxD5a, a Xenopus winged helix gene, maintains an immature neural ectoderm via transcriptional repression that is dependent on the C-terminal domain. Dev Biol 232: 439-457.
55. Sun BI, Bush SM, Collins-Racie LA, LaVallie ER, DiBlasio-Smith EA, Wolfman NM, McCoy JM, Sive HL. 1999. derrière: a TGF-beta family member required for posterior development in Xenopus. Development 126: 1467-1482.
56. Takeda M, Kurauchi T, Yamazaki T, Izutsu Y, Maéno M. 2005. Neptune is involved in posterior axis and tail formation in Xenopus embryogenesis. Dev Dyn 234: 63-73.
57. Takeuchi M, Nakabayashi J, Sakaguchi T, Yamamoto TS, Takahashi H, Takeda H, Ueno N. 2003. The prickle-related gene in vertebrates is essential for gastrulation cell movements. Curr Biol 13: 674-679.
58. Toyama R, Curtiss PE, Otani H, Kimura M, Dawid IB, Taira M. 1995. The LIM class homeobox gene lim5: implied role in CNS patterning in Xenopus and zebrafish. Dev Biol 170: 583-593.
59. Umbhauer M, Penzo-Méndez A, Clavilier L, Boucaut J, Riou J. 2000. Signaling specificities of fibroblast growth factor receptors in early Xenopus embryo. J Cell Sci 113: 2865-2875.
60. Umemori H. 2009. Weaving the neuronal net with target-derived fibroblast growth factors. Dev Growth Differ 51: 263-270.
61. Veenstra GJ, Beumer TL, Peterson-Maduro J, Stegeman BI, Karg HA, van der Vliet PC, Destrée OH. 1995. Dynamic and differential Oct-1 expression during early Xenopus embryogenesis: persistence of Oct-1 protein following down-regulation of the RNA. Mech Dev 50: 103-117.
62. Wallingford JB, Goto T, Keller R, Harland RM. 2002. Cloning and expression of Xenopus Prickle, an orthologue of a Drosophila planar cell polarity gene. Mech Dev 116: 183-186.
63. Wanner SJ, Danos MC, Lohr JL, Miller JR. 2005. Molecular cloning and expression of Ena/Vasp-like (Evl) during Xenopus development. Gene Expr Patterns 5: 423-428.
64. White RJ, Sun BI, Sive HL, Smith JC. 2002. Direct and indirect regulation of derrière, a Xenopus mesoderm-inducing factor, by VegT. Development 129: 4867-4876.
65. Winning RS, Shea LJ, Marcus SJ, Sargent TD. 1991. Developmental regulation of transcription factor AP-2 during Xenopus laevis embryogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res 19: 3709-3714.
66. Yan B, Neilson KM, Moody SA. 2009. FoxD5 plays a critical upstream role in regulating neural ectodermal fate and the onset of neural differentiation. Dev Biol 329: 80-95.
67. Zhang J, King ML. 1996. Xenopus VegT RNA is localized to the vegetal cortex during oogenesis and encodes a novel T-box transcription factor involved in mesodermal patterning. Development 122: 4119-4129.
68. Zhang J, Houston DW, King ML, Payne C, Wylie C, Heasman J. 1998. The role of maternal VegT in establishing the primary germ layers in Xenopus embryos. Cell 94: 515-524.
69. Zhao H, Tanegashima K, Ro H, Dawid IB. 2008. Lrig3 regulates neural crest formation in Xenopus by modulating Fgf and Wnt signaling pathways. Development 135: 1283-1293.
70. Zhao J, Cao Y, Zhao C, Postlethwait J, Meng A. 2003. An SP1-like transcription factor Spr2 acts downstream of Fgf signaling to mediate mesoderm induction. EMBO J. 22: 6078-6088.
71. Zon LI, Mather C, Burgess S, Bolce ME, Harland RM, Orkin SH. 1991. Expression of GATA-binding proteins during embryonic development in Xenopus laevis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 10642-10646.