Effects of changed aircraft noise exposure on the use of outdoor recreational areas

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3890-3915

  Krog, Norun Hjertager ^a   Engdahl, B ^a   Tambs, Kristian ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Aircraft noise; Annoyance; Behavioural effects; Constraints; Displacement; Outdoor recreation; Panel study; Place attachment; Telephone survey

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT NOISE; AIRPORT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; NORWAY; PANEL STUDY; RECREATION; TELEPHONE;

EID: 78649688680     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16604601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph7113890     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Driver, B.L.; Nash, R.; Haas, G. Wilderness benefits: A state-of-knowledge review. In Proceedings: National Wilderness Research Conference: Issues, State of Knowledge, Future Directions, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 23-36 July 1985; USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-220; Intermountain Research Station USDA Forest Service: Ogden, UT, USA, 1987; pp. 294-319.
2. Vaagbø, O. Den norske turkulturen: friluftslivets år 1993; FRIFO: Oslo, Norway, 1993.
3. Vining, J.; Fishwick, L. An exploratory study of outdoor recreation site choices. J. Leisure Res. 1991, 23,114-132.
4. Tarrant, M.A.; Haas, G.E.; Manfredo, M.J. Factors affecting visitor evaluations of aircraft overflights of wilderness areas. Soc. Nat. Resour. 1995, 8, 351-360.
5. Fidell, S.; Silvati, L.; Howe, R.; Pearsons, K.S.; Tabachnick, B.; Knopf, R.C.; Gramann, J.; Buchanan, T. Effects of aircraft overflights on wilderness recreationists. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996, 100, 2909-2918.
6. Anderson, G.S.; Horonjeff, R.D.; Menge, C.W.; Miller, N.P.; Robert, W.E.; Rossano, C.; Sanchez, G.; Baumgartner, R.M.; McDonald, C. Dose-Response Relationships Derived from Data Collected at Grand Canyon, Haleakala and Hawaii Volcanoes National Parks; HMMH Report No. 290940.14, NPOA Report No. 93-96; National Park Service: Denver, CO, USA, 1993.
7. Fleming, G.G.; Roof, C.J.; Rapoza, A.S.; Read, D.R.; Webster, J.C.; Liebman, P.C.; Valihura, P.J.; Lewis, K.C.; Schomer, P.D.; Plante, J.A.; Draper, J.A. Development of Noise Dose/Visitor Response Relationships for the National Parks Overflight Rule: Bryce Canyon National Park Study; FAA-AEE-98-01/DOT-VNTSC-FAA-98-6; US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1998.
8. Miller, N.P.; Anderson, G.S.; Horonjeff, R.D.; Thompson, R.H. Mitigating the Effects of Military Aircraft Overflights on Recreational Users of Parks; AFRL-HE-WP-TR-2000-0034; Harris, Miller, Miller and Hanson, Inc.: Lexington, MA, USA, 1999.
9. Krog, N.H.; Aasvang, G.M.; Osmundsen, E.; Engdahl, B. Effects of noise from military jets on hikers in a recreational area. In Proceedings of Internoise, Nice, France, August 2000.
10. Krog, N.H.; Engdahl, B. Annoyance with aircraft noise in local recreational areas, contingent on changes in exposure and other context variables. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116, 323-333.
11. Krog, N.H.; Engdahl, B. Annoyance with aircraft noise in local recreational areas and the recreationist' noise situation at home. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005, 117, 221-231.
12. Sutton, S.T. Aircraft noise impacts: A case study in the glacier region of the west coast of New Zealand. Noise Control Eng. J. 1999, 47, 87-90.
13. Booth, K.; Jones, N.C.; Devlin, P.J. Measuring the Effects of Aircraft Overflights on Recreationists in Natural Settings; Department of Conservation Technical Series 18; Department of Conservation: Wellington, New Zealand, 1999.
14. McDonald, C.D.; Baumgarten, R.M.; Iachan, R. Aircraft Management Studies: National Park Service Visitors Survey; HMMH Report No. 290940.12; NPOA Report No. 94-2; National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior: Burlington, MA, USA, 1995.
15. Gibbons, S.; Ruddell, E.J. The effect of goal orientation and place dependence on select goal interference among winter backcountry users. Leisure Sci. 1995, 17, 171-183.
16. Lucas, R.C. Wilderness perception and use-The example of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Nat. Resour. J. 1964, 3, 394-411.
17. Shelby, B. Contrasting recreational experiences-Motors and oars in the Grand-Canyon. J. Soil. Water Conserv. 1980, 35, 129-131.
18. Knopp, T.B.; Tyger, J.D. A study of conflict in recreational land use-Snowmobiling vs. ski-touring. J. Leisure Res. 1973, 5, 6-17.
19. Jackson, E.L.; Wong, R.A.G. Perceived conflict between urban cross-country skiers and snowmobilers in Alberta. J. Leisure Res. 1982, 14, 47-62.
20. Vittersø, J.; Chipeniuk, R.; Skar, M.; Vistad, O.I. Recreational conflict is affective: The case of cross-country skiers and snowmobiles. Leisure Sci. 2004, 26, 227-243.
21. Jackson, E.L. Will research on leisure constraints still be relevant in the twenty-first century? J. Leisure Res. 2000, 32, 62-68.
22. Jackson, E.L. Leisure constraints/constrained leisure: Special issue introduction. J. Leisure Res. 1991, 23, 279-285 (also published in Leisure Sci. 1991, 13, 273-278).
23. Jackson, E.L. In the eye of the beholder: A comment on Samdahl & Jekubovich (1997), A critique of leisure constraints: Comparative analyses and understandings." J. Leisure Res. 1997, 29, 458-468.
24. McClaskie, S.L.; Napier, T.L.; Christensen, J.E. Factors influencing outdoor recreation participation: A state study. J. Leisure Res. 1986, 18, 190-205.
25. Jackson, E.L. Recognizing patterns of leisure constraints: Results from alternative analyses. J. Leisure Res. 1993, 25, 129-149.
26. McGuire, F.A.; Dottavio, D.; Oleary, J.T. Constraints to participation in outdoor recreation across the life-span-A nationwide study of limitors and prohibitors. Gerontologist 1986, 26, 538-544.
27. Tierney, P.T.; Dahl, R.; Chavez, D. Cultural diversity in use of undeveloped natural areas by Los Angeles county residents. Tourism Manage. 2001, 22, 271-277.
28. Wright, B.A.; Goodale, T.L. Beyond non-participation: Validation of interest and frequency of participation categories in constraints research. J. Leisure Res. 1991, 23, 314-331.
29. Jackson, E.L.; Dunn, E. Is constrained leisure an internally homogeneous concept. Leisure Sci. 1991, 13, 167-184.
30. Carroll, B.; Alexandris, K. Perception of constraints and strength of motivation: Their relationship to recreational sport participation in Greece. J. Leisure Res. 1997, 29, 279-299.
31. Nadirova, N.; Jackson, E.L. Alternative criterion variables against which to assess the impacts of constraints to leisure. J. Leisure Res. 2000, 32, 396-405.
32. Jackson, E.L. Geographical aspects of constraints on leisure and recreation. Can. Geogr.-Geogr. Can. 1994, 38, 110-121.
33. Alexandris, K.; Tsorbatzoudis, C.; Grouios, G. Perceived constraints on recreational sport participation: Investigating their relationship with intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation. J. Leisure Res. 2002, 34, 233-252.
34. Hultsman, W. Recognizing patterns of leisure constraints: An extension of the exploration of dimensionality. J. Leisure Res. 1995, 27, 228-244.
35. Fedler, A.J.; Ditton, R.B. Dropping out and dropping in: A study of factors for changing recreational fishing participation. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 2001, 21, 283-292.
36. Bialeschki, M.D.; Henderson, K.A. Constraints to trail use. J. Park Recreat. Admi. 1988, 6, 20-28.
37. Anderson, D.H.; Brown, P.J. The displacement process in recreation. J. Leisure Res. 1984, 16, 61-73.
38. Hall, T.; Shelby, B. Temporal and spatial displacement: Evidence from a high-use reservoir and alternate sites. J. Leisure Res. 2000, 32, 435-456.
39. Shelby, B.; Vaske, J.J. Resource and activity substitutes for recreational salmon fishing in New-Zealand. Leisure Sci. 1991, 13, 21-32.
40. Brunson, M.W.; Shelby, B. Recreation substitutability-A research agenda. Leisure Sci. 1993, 15, 67-74.
41. Kuentzel, W.F.; Heberlein, T.A. More visitors, less crowding: Change and stability of norms over time at the Apostle Islands. J. Leisure Res. 2003, 35, 349-371.
42. Johnson, A.K.; Dawson, C.P. An exploratory study of the complexities of coping behavior in Adirondack wilderness. Leisure Sci. 2004, 26, 281-293.
43. Becker, R.H. Displacement of recreational users between the lower St Croix and upper Mississippi Rivers. J. Environ. Manage. 1981, 13, 259-267.
44. Vaske, J.; Donnelly, M.P.; Heberlein, T.A. Perception of crowding and resource quality by early and more recent visitors. Leisure Sci. 1980, 3, 367-381.
45. Miller, T.A.; McCool, S.F. Coping with stress in outdoor recreational settings: An application of transactional stress theory. Leisure Sci. 2003, 25, 257-275.
46. Manning, R.E.; Valliere, W.A. Coping in outdoor recreation: Causes and consequences of crowding and conflict among community residents. J. Leisure Res. 2001, 33, 410-426.
47. Shindler, B.; Shelby, B. Product shift in recreation settings: Findings and implications from panel research. Leisure Sci. 1995, 17, 91-107.
48. Vorkinn, M. Visitor response to management regulations-A study among recreationists in Southern Norway. Environ. Manage. 1998, 22, 737-746.
49. Kuentzel, W.F.; Heberlein, T.A. Cognitive and behavioral adaptations to perceived crowding: A panel study of coping and displacement. J. Leisure Res. 1992, 24, 377-393.
50. Shelby, B.; Bregenzer, N.S.; Johnson, R. Displacement and product shift: Empirical evidence from Oregon rivers. J. Leisure Res. 1988, 20, 274-288.
51. Robertson, R.A.; Regula, J.A. Recreational displacement and overall satisfaction: A study of Central Iowa's licensed boaters. J. Leisure Res. 1994, 26, 174-181.
52. Aasvang, G.M.; Engdahl, B. Subjective responses to aircraft noise in an outdoor recreational setting: A combined field and laboratory study. J. Sound. Vib. 2004, 76, 981-996.
53. Krog, N.H.; Engdahl, B.; Tambs, K. Effects of changed noise exposure on experiential qualities of outdoor recreational areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 3739-3759.
54. Engdahl, B. Flystøy i rekreasjonsområdet på Bygdøy og Romeriksåsen. Analyse av lydopptak i forbindelse med en feltundersøkelse om effekt av flystøy i rekreasjons-og friluftsområder; Report No. 2; Norwegian Institute of Public Health: Oslo, Norway, 2001.
55. Oslo kommune Friluftsetaten. Turkart Oslo vest; Available online: http://www.friluftsetaten.oslo.kommune.no/kart/byen/turkart/turkart_oslo_vest/(accessed on 27 October 2010).
56. Akershus fylkeskommune. Turkart Akershus; Available online: http://kartinakershus.akershus-fk.no/Turkart/ (accessed on 27 October 2010).
57. Jackson, E.L.; Scott, D. Constraints to leisure. In Leisure Studies. Prospects for the Twenty-First Century; Jackson, E.L., Burton, T.L., Eds.; Venture Publishing: State College, PA, USA, 1999; pp. 299-321.
58. Altman, D.G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1997.
59. Kariel, H.G. Factors affecting response to noise in outdoor recreational environments. Geographica 1990, 34, 142-149.
60. Williams, D.R.; Patterson, M.E.; Roggenbuck, J.W.; Watson, A.E. Beyond the commodity metaphor-Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sci. 1992, 14, 29-46.
61. Moore, R.L.; Graefe, A.R. Attachments to recreation settings-The case of rail-trail users. Leisure Sci. 1994, 16, 17-31.
62. Vorkinn, M.; Riese, H. Environmental concern in a local context-The significance of place attachment. Environ. Behav. 2001, 33, 249-263.
63. Williams, D.R.; Vaske, J.J. The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Sci. 2003, 49, 830-840.
64. Moore, R.L.; Scott, D. Place attachment and context: Comparing a park and a trail within. Forest Sci. 2003, 49, 877-884.
65. Kyle, G.; Graefe, A.; Manning, R.; Bacon, J. Predictors of behavioral loyalty among hikers along the Appalachian Trail. Leisure Sci. 2004, 26, 99-118.
66. Ryan, R.L. Exploring the effects of environmental experience on attachment to urban natural areas. Environ. Behav. 2005, 37, 3-42.