Physiotherapists' experience of client participation in physiotherapy interventions: A phenomenographic study

Advances in Physiotherapy

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 217-223

  Larsson, Ingalill ^a   Liljedahl, Kerstin ^b   Gard, Gunvor ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Habilitation and Assistive Technology Services   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Client participation; goal setting; health paradigm; phenomenography; physiotherapy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENDER; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; JOB EXPERIENCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PHYSIOTHERAPY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 78649684181     PISSN: 14038196     EISSN: 16511948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14038196.2010.497543     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Hills R, Kitchen S. Towards a theory of patient satisfaction with physiotherapy: Exploring the concept of satisfaction. Physiother Theory Pract. 2007;23:243-54.
2. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs [Internet] Sweden: The Health and Medical Service Act (1982:763) [updated 2003 August; cited 2009 November 7]. Available from http://www. sweden.gov.se/content/1/c6/02/31/25/a7ea8ee1.pdf
3. Darrah J, Lommis J, Manns P, Norton B, May L. Role of conceptual models in a physical therapy curriculum: Applications of an integrated model of theory, research, and clinical practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2006;22:239-50.
4. Edwards I, Richardson B. Clinical reasoning and population health: Decision making for an emerging paradigm of health care. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24:183-93.
5. Barron CJ, Klaber Moffet JA, Potter M. Patient expectations of physiotherapy: Defi nitions, concepts and theories. Physi-other Theory Pract. 2007;23:37-46
6. Bovend ' Eerdt TJH, Botell RE, Wade DT. Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: A practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:352-61.
7. Anjoulat I, d ' Hoore W, Deccache A. Patient empowerment in theory and practice: Polysemy or cacophony? Patient Educ Couns. 2006;66:13-20.
8. Marton F. Phenomenography-describing concepts of the world around us. Instr Sci. 1981;10:177-200.
9. Marton F, Booth S. Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1997.
10. Säljö R. [Learning in practice: A social-cultural perspective]. Stockholm: Prisma; 2000 (in Swedish).
11. Jones M, Edwards I, Gifford L. Conceptual models for implementing biopsychosocial theory in clinical practice. Man Ther. 2002;7:2-9.
12. World Health Organization. International Classifi cation of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
13. Larsson I, Gard G. Conceptions of physiotherapy knowledge among Swedish physiotherapists: A phenomenographic study. Physiotherapy. 2006;92:110-15.
14. Allert L, B ü rge E, Monnin D. ICF: Clinical relevance for physiotherapy? A critical review. Adv Phys. 2008;10:127-37.
15. Darrah J. Using the ICF as a framework for clinical decision making in pediatric physical therapy. Adv Phys. 2008;10: 146-51.
16. Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, Uelbart D, Aeschliman A, Stucki G. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther. 2002;82:1098-107.
17. Rauch A, Cieza A, Stucki G. How to apply the International Classifi cation of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for rehabilitation management in clinical practice. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44:329-42.
18. Bainbridges LA, Harris SR. Informed shared decision-making: A model for physiotherapy education and practice. Physiother Can. 2005;58:74-81.
19. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651-61.
20. Mead N, Bower P, Hann P. The impact of general practitioners ' patient-centredness on patients ' post-consultation satisfaction and enablement. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:283-99.
21. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWiliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient-centered medicine. Transforming the clinical method. 2nd ed. Abindgon: Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd; 2003.
22. Leydon GM, Boulton M, Monihan C, Jones A, Mossman J, Boudioni M, et al. Cancer patients ' information needs and information seeking behaviour: In depth interview study. BMJ. 2000;320:909-13
23. Wohlin Wöttrich A, Stenström C H, Engardt M, Tham K, von Koch L. Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient ' s and therapist ' s perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1198-205.
24. Taylor K. Paternalism, participation and partnership-The evolution of patient centeredness in the consultation. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:150-5.
25. Forbat L, Cayless S, Knighting K, Cornwell J, Kearney N. Engaging patients in health care: An empirical study of the role of engagement on attitudes and actions. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:84-90.
26. Dahlgren, L O, Fallsberg, M. Phenomenography as a qualitative approach in social pharmacy research. J Soc Adm Pharm. 1991;8:150-6.
27. Larsson S. [Qualitative analysis-Exemplifi ed by phenom-enography]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 1986 (in Swedish).
28. Randall K E, McEwan I R. Writing patient-centred functional goals. Phys Ther. 2000;80;1197-203.
29. Mastos M, Miller K, Eliasson AC, Imms C. Goal-directed training: Linking theories of treatment to clinical practice for improved functional activities in daily life. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:47-55.
30. Sandman L. The concept of negotiation in shared decision making. Health Care Anal. 2009;17:236-43.
31. Cooper K, Smith B H, Hancock E. Patient-centeredness in physiotherapy from the perspective of the chronic low back pain patient. Physiotherapy. 2008;94:244-252.
32. Parry RH. Communication during goal-setting in physiotherapy treatment sessions. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:668-62
33. Dall ' Alba G. Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educ Philos Theor. 2009;41.