para-Phenylenediamine: The profile of an important allergen. Results of the IVDK

British Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 159, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 379-386

  Schnuch, A ^a   Lessmann, H ^a   Frosch, P J ^b   Uter, W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

CAS 106 50 3; Contact allergy; Cross reactions; Hair dyes; Isopropylparaphenylenediamine; Para phenylenediamine; Rubber

Indexed keywords

HAIR DYE; PAINT; PHENYLENEDIAMINE; RUBBER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION; CLOTHING; CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DERMATOLOGY; DRUG UTILIZATION; FEMALE; HAIRDRESSER; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PATCH TEST; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SHOE;

ADULT; ALLERGENS; BEAUTY CULTURE; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DERMATITIS, OCCUPATIONAL; FEMALE; GERMANY; HAIR DYES; HUMANS; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PATCH TESTS; PHENYLENEDIAMINES; PREVALENCE;

EID: 47549095842     PISSN: 00070963     EISSN: 13652133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08644.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Johansen J-D, Lepoittevin J-P, Basketter D et al. Allergens of special interest. In : Contact Dermatitis (Frosch PJ, Menne T, Lepoittevin J-P, eds 4th edn. Berlin : Springer, 2006 507 36.
2. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF (eds). Fisher's Contact Dermatitis, 4th edn. Baltimore : Williams & Wilkins, 1995.
3. Fregert S, Hjorth N, Magnusson B et al. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. Trans St John's Hosp Dermatol Soc 1969 55 : 17 35.
4. Frosch PJ. Aktuelle Kontaktallergene. Hautarzt 1990 41 (Suppl. 10 129 33.
5. Schnuch A, Geier J, Lessmann H et al. Kontaktallergene im aktuellen Zeitverlauf. Geschlechts- und altersspezifische Auswertungen der Daten des IVDK der Jahre 1995-2001. Allergo J 2004 13 : 57 69.
6. Patel S, Basketter DA, Jefferies D et al. Patch test frequency to p-phenylenediamine: follow up over the last 6 years. Contact Dermatitis 2007 56 : 35 7.
7. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Schnuch A. Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and clients - an 8-year analysis of IVDK data. Contact Dermatitis 2003 49 : 236 40.
8. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Schnuch A. Aktuelle Sensibilisierungshä ufigkeiten gegen Haarkosmetik-Kontaktallergene bei Friseuren und Kundinnen - Ergebnisse des IVDK 2003-2006. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2007 5 : 993 1001.
9. Andersen KE, White IR, Goossens A. Allergens from the standard series. In : Contact Dermatitis (Frosch PJ, Menne T, Lepoittevin J-P, eds 4th edn. Berlin : Springer, 2006 453 92.
10. Wahlberg JE, Tammela M, Anderson C et al. Contact allergy to p-phenylenediamine in Sweden. Follow-up after reversed intervention. Derm Beruf Umwelt 2002 50 : 51 4.
11. Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, Frosch PJ. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: the information network of the departments of dermatology (IVDK) in Germany - a surveillance system on contact allergies. Eur J Dermatol 1998 8 : 36 40.
12. Uter W, Schnuch A, Gefeller O. Guidelines for the descriptive presentation and statistical analysis of contact allergy data. Contact Dermatitis 2004 51 : 47 56.
13. Schnuch A, Aberer W, Agathos M et al. Leitlinien der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft (DDG) zur Durchführung des Epikutantests mit Kontaktallergenen. Hautarzt 2001 52 : 864 6.
14. Uter W, Mackiewicz M, Schnuch A, Geier J. Interne Qualitätssicherung von Epikutantest-Daten des multizentrischen Projektes 'Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken' (IVDK). Derm Beruf Umwelt 2005 53 : 107 14.
15. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W et al. National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Population adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40 000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 1997 37 : 200 9.
16. Schnuch A. PAFS: population adjusted frequency of sensitization. (I). Influence of sex and age. Contact Dermatitis 1996 34 : 377 82.
17. Uter W, Gefeller O, Geier J et al. Untersuchungen zur Abhängigkeit der Sensibilisierung gegen wichtige Allergene von arbeitsbedingten sowie individuellen Faktoren. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin. Fb 949. Bremerhaven : Wirtschaftsverlag NW, 2002.
18. Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, Gefeller O. Epidemiology of contact allergy: an estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug utilisation research (CE-DUR) approach. Contact Dermatitis 2002 47 : 32 9.
19. Menezes de Padua CA, Uter W, Schnuch A. Contact allergy to topical drugs: prevalence in a clinical setting and estimation of frequency at the population level. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007 16 : 377 84.
20. Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI. Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Berlin : Springer Verlag, 2000.
21. Schnuch A, Uter W. The role of clinical epidemiology in the study of occupational contact dermatitis. In : Handbook of Occupational Dermatology (Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI, eds). Berlin : Springer Verlag, 2000 17 26.
22. Nethercott JR, Holness DL, Adams RM et al. Patch testing with a routine screening tray in North America, 1987 through 1989: IV. Occupation and response. Am J Contact Dermat 1991 2 : 247 54.
23. Schnuch A, Brasch J, Uter W. Polysensitization and increased susceptibility in contact allergy: a review. Allergy 2008 63 : 156 67.
24. Armstrong DKB, Jones AB, Smith HR et al. Occupational sensitization to p-phenylenediamine: a 17-year review. Contact Dermatitis 1999 41 : 348 9.
25. Hillen U, Grabbe S, Uter W. Patch test results in patients with scalp dermatitis: analysis of data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology. Contact Dermatitis 2007 56 : 87 93.
26. Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Schnuch A. Frühzeitige Erkennung allergener Stoffe bei beruflicher und nicht-beruflicher Exposition (FaSt). Forschungsvorhaben des HVBG, der BGW und den BG-Bau. Abschlußbericht des IVDK. Sankt Augustin : Hauptverband der Gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften, 2002.
27. LeCoz ChJ. Clothing. In : Contact Dermatitis (Frosch PJ, Menne T, Lepoittevin J-P, eds 4th edn. Berlin : Springer, 2006 679 702.
28. Taylor JS, Erkek E, Podmore P. Shoes. In : Contact Dermatitis (Frosch PJ, Menne T, Lepoittevin J-P, eds 4th edition. Berlin : Springer, 2006 703 16.
29. Estlander T, Kanerva L, Jolanki R. Occupational allergic dermatoses from textile, leather, and fur dyes. Am J Contact Dermat 1990 1 : 13 20.
30. Morris A, English J. Printers and lithographers. In : Handbook of Occupational Dermatology (Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI, eds). Berlin : Springer Verlag, 2000 1067 71.
31. Hillen U, Uter W, Goergens U, Goos M. Berufliche Kontaktallergien bei Malern und Lackierern. Ergebnisse des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken und der Deutschen Kontaktallergie Gruppe. Derm Beruf Umwelt 2001 49 : 263 8.
32. Guin JD, Hamann C, Sullivan KM. Natural and synthetic rubber. In : Occupational Skin Disease (Adams RM, ed 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA : W.B. Saunders, 1999 501 51.
33. Uter W, Rühl R, Pfahlberg A et al. Contact allergy in construction workers: results of a multifactorial analysis. Ann Occup Hyg 2004 48 : 21 7.
34. Seidenari S, Giusti F, Massone F, Mantovani L. Sensitization to disperse dyes in a patch test population over a five-year period. Am J Contact Dermat 2002 13 : 101 7.
35. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J et al. Die Epikutantestung mit 'Parastoffen'. Derm Beruf Umwelt 2002 50 : 97 104.
36. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J et al. The spectrum of allergic (cross-)sensitivity in clinical patch testing with 'para amino' compounds. Allergy 2002 57 : 319 22.
37. Goon AT, Gilmour NJ, Basketter DA et al. High frequency of simultaneous sensitivity to Disperse Orange 3 in patients with positive patch tests to para-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 2003 48 : 248 50.
38. Uter W, Geier J, Lessmann H, Hausen BM. Contact allergy to Disperse Blue 106 and Disperse Blue 124 in German and Austrian patients, 1995 to 1999. Contact Dermatitis 2001 44 : 173 7.
39. Geier J, Gefeller O. Sensitivity of patch tests with rubber mixes: results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology from 1990 to 1993. Am J Contact Dermat 1995 6 : 143 9.
40. Cronin E. Contact Dermatitis. Edinburgh : Churchill Livingstone, 1980.
41. Herve-Bazin B, Gradiski D, Duprat P et al. Occupational eczema from N-isopropyl-N'-phenylparaphenylenediamine (IPPD) and N-dimethy-1,3 butyl-N'-phenylparaphenylenediamine (DMPPD) in tyres. Contact Dermatitis 1977 3 : 1 15.
42. Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Geier J et al. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 2004 50 : 65 76.
43. Sösted H, Hesse U, Menne T et al. Contact dermatitis to hair dyes in a Danish adult population: an interview-based study. Br J Dermatol 2005 153 : 132 5.
44. Brasch J, Schnuch A, Uter W. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy. Allergy 2006 61 : 364 9.
45. Ho SG, Basketter DA, Jefferies D et al. Analysis of para-phenylenediamine allergic patients in relation to strength of patch test reaction. Br J Dermatol 2005 153 : 364 7.
46. Foussereau J. Les Eczémas Allergiques, Cosmetologiques, Thérapeutiques, et Vestimentaires. Paris : Masson, 1987.
47. Calnan CD. Studies in contact dermatitis (XX). Active sensitization. Trans St John's Hosp Dermatol Soc 1967 53 : 128 34.
48. Friedman PS. Clinical aspects of allergic contact dermatitis. In : Toxicology of Contact Hypersensitivity (Kimber I, Maurer Th, eds). London : Taylor & Francis, 1996 26 56.
49. Skog E. Sensitization to p-phenylenediamine. Arch Dermatol 1965 92 : 276 80.
50. Dawe SA, White IR, Rycroft RJ et al. Active sensitization to para-phenylenediamine and its relevance: a 10-year review. Contact Dermatitis 2004 51 : 96 7.
51. Jensen CD, Paulsen E, Andersen KE. Retrospective evaluation of the consequence of alleged patch test sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 2006 55 : 30 5.
52. McFadden JP, White IR, Johansen J, Bruze M. Should para-phenylenediamine (PPD) 1% pet. be part of commercially available standard series? Contact Dermatitis 2005 53 : 183 4.
53. Devos SA, van der Valk PGM. The risk of active sensitization to PPD. Contact Dermatitis 2001 44 : 273 5.
54. Becker D, Mahler V, Szliska C et al. The concentration of para-phenylenediamine (PPD) for routine patch testing in a standard series needs to be redefined. Contact Dermatitis 2005 53 : 186 7.
55. Aalto-Korte K, Alanko K, Kuuliala O, Jolanki R. Late reactions in patch tests: a 4-year review from a clinic of occupational dermatology. Contact Dermatitis 2007 56 : 81 6.
56. Hillen U, Jappe U, Frosch PJ et al. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Br J Dermatol 2006 154 : 665 70.
57. Uter W, Hillen U, Geier J. Is incident sensitization to p-phenylenediamine related to particular exposure patterns? Results of a questionnaire study. Contact Dermatitis 2007 56 : 266 70.
58. Thyssen JP, Uter W, Schnuch A et al. 10-year prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in Denmark estimated through the CE-DUR method. Contact Dermatitis 2007 57 : 265 72.