Sensitivity and specificity of the consumer open skin allergy test as a method of prediction of contact dermatitis to hair dyes

European Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 18-25

  Krasteva, Maya ^a   Cottin, Martin ^a   Cristaudo, Antonio ^b   Lainé, Gérard ^a   Nohynek, Gerhard ^c   Orton, David ^d   Toutain, Hervé ^a   Severino, Vincenzo ^b   Wilkinson, John ^d  

^a L ORÉAL RECHERCHE   (France)

^b Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri Rome   (Italy)

^c SAINT LOUIS HOSPITAL   (France)

^d AMERSHAM HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Elicitation thresholds; Hair colouring products; Open testing; Paraphenylenediamine; Skin sensitivity test

Indexed keywords

COLORING AGENT; COSMETIC; HAIR DYE; PHENYLENEDIAMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ALLERGIC REACTION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CELL SPECIFICITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSUMER; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PAPULE; PREDICTION; SECONDARY PREVENTION; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN SENSITIVITY; SKIN TEST;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHENYLENEDIAMINES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN TESTS;

EID: 13844251898     PISSN: 11671122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Maouad M, Fleischer AB, Sherertz EF, et al. Significance-prevalence index number: a re-interpretation and enhancement of data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. J Am Acad Dermatal 1999; 41: 573-6.
2. Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. Am J Cont Dermatitis 2003; 14: 59-62.
3. Calnan C. Adverse reactions to hair products. In: Zwiak C, ed. The science of hair care. New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1986: 409-23.
4. Krasteva MK, Cristaudo A, Hall B, et al. Contact sensitivity to hair dyes can be detected by the consumer open test. Eur J Dermatol 2002; 12: 322-6.
5. Frosch PJ, Burrows D, Camarasa JG, et al. Allergic reactions to a hairdressers' series: results from 9 European centres. Contact Dermatis 1993; 28: 180-3.
6. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF. Allergy to preservatives and vehicles in cosmetics and toiletry. In: Rietscnel RL, Fowler JF, eds. Fisher's contact dermatitis. 5th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001: 211-59.
7. Krasteva M, Kehren J, Sayag M, et al. Contact dermatitis. II. Clinical aspects and diagnosis. Eur J Dermatol 1999; 9: 144-59.
8. Devos SA, Van Der Valk PG. Epicutaneous patch testing. Eur J Dermatol 2002; 12: 506-13.
9. Johansen JD, Bruze M, Andersen KE, et al. The repeated open application test: suggestions for a scale evaluation. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 39: 95-6.
10. Fregert S. Manual of contact dermatitis. 2nd edition. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1981.
11. Friedmann PS, Moss C, Shuster S, et al. Quantitation of sensitization and responsiveness to dinitrochlorobenzene in normal subjects. Br J Dermatol 1983; 109(Suppl 25): 86-8.
12. Basketter D, Horev L, Slodovnik D, et al. Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium. Contact Dermatitis, 2001; 44: 70-4.
13. Bruze M, Johansen JD, Andersen KE, et al. Deodorants: An experimental provocation study with cinnamic aldehyde. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48: 194-200.
14. Svedman C, Bruze M, Johansen JD, et al. Deodorants: An experimental provocation study with hydroxycitronellal. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48: 217-23.
15. Epstein WL, Taylor MK. Experimental sensitization to paraphenylenediamine and paratoluenediamine in man. Acta Dermatovenereol 1979; 59: 55-7.
16. Ishihara M, Nogami T, Itoh M, et al. Basic studies on contact dermatitis due to hair colourings and cold permanent wave solutions. Japanese Cosmetic Journal 1983; 7: 272-82.
17. Reiss F, Gahwiler M, Lustig B. Sensitivity to hair dyes. J Allergy 1957; 28: 134-41.
18. Hextall JM, Alagaratnam NJ, Glendinning AK, et al. Dose-time relationships for the elicitation of contact allergy to paraphenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 47: 96-9.
19. McFadden JP, Wokelin SH, Holloway DB, et al. The effect of duration on the elicitation of para-phenylenediamine contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39: 79-81.
20. Hindsen M, Bruze M, Christensen OB. Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1999; 10: 62-7.
21. Ayala F, Balato N, Lembo G. Statistical evaluation of the persistence of acquired hypersensitivity by standardized patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 354-8.
22. Valsecchi R, Rossi A, Bigordi A, et al. The lass of cantact sensitizatian in man. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24: 183-6.
23. Nielsen NH, Linneberg A, Menné T, et al. Persistence of contact allergy among Danish adults: an 8-year follow-up study. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 45: 350-3.
24. Epstein WL. Poison oak and poison ivy dermatitis. In: Adams RM, ed. Occupational skin disease. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1990: 536-42; 2nd edition.
25. Seo KI, Eun HC. Loss of contact sensitization evaluated by laser doppler blood flowmetry and transepidermal water loss measurement. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 233-6.
26. Mastrolonardo M, Lopalca PL, Diaferio A. Tapical immunotherapy with contact sensitizers: a model to study the natural history of delayed hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 47: 214-214.
27. Chan YC, Ng SK, Goh CL. Positive patch test reactions to paraphenylenediamine, their clinical relevance and the concept of clinical tolerance. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 45: 217-20.
28. Krasteva M, Kehren J, Ducluzeau MT, et al. Contact dermatitis. I. Pathophysiology of contact sensitivity. Eur J Dermatol 1999; 9: 65-77.
29. Saint-Mézard P, Bérard F, Dubois B, et al. The role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in contact sensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol 2004; 14: 131-8.