Callosal tracts and patterns of hemispheric dominance: A combined fMRI and DTI study

NeuroImage

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 779-786

  Häberling, Isabelle S ^a   Badzakova Trajkov, Gjurgjica ^a   Corballis, Michael C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Crowding; Diffusion tensor imaging; Handedness; Interhemispheric transfer; Laterality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE TRACT; NEUROANATOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BRAIN MAPPING; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649637485     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.072     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aboitiz F., Lopez J., Montiel J. Long distance communication in the human brain: timing constraints for inter-hemispheric synchrony and the origin of brain lateralization. Biol. Res. 2003, 36:89-99.
2. Adcock J.E., Wise R.G., Oxbury J.M., Oxbury S.M., Matthews P.M. Quantitative fMRI assessment of the differences in lateralization of language-related brain activation in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroimage 2003, 18:423-438.
3. Annett M. Laterality and cerebral dominance. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1991, 32:219-232.
4. Annett M. Handedness and cerebral dominance: the right shift theory. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 1998, 10:459-469.
5. Annett M. Handedness and Brain Asymmetry: the Right Shift Theory 2002, Psychology Press, East Sussex BN3 2FA.
6. Badzakova-Trajkov G., Haberling I.S., Roberts R.P., Corballis M.C. Cerebral asymmetries: complementary and independent processes. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e9682.
7. Banich M.T. Interhemispheric processing: theoretical considerations and empirical approaches. Brain Asymmetry 1995, 427-450. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. R.J. Davidson, K. Hugdahl (Eds.).
8. Behrens T.E., Johansen-Berg H., Woolrich M.W., Smith S.M., Wheeler-Kingshott C.A., Boulby P.A., Barker G.J., Sillery E.L., Sheehan K., Ciccarelli O., Thompson A.J., Brady J.M., Matthews P.M. Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6:750-757.
9. Behrens T.E., Woolrich M.W., Jenkinson M., Johansen-Berg H., Nunes R.G., Clare S., Matthews P.M., Brady J.M., Smith S.M. Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2003, 50:1077-1088.
10. Bourne V.J. Examining the relationship between degree of handedness and degree of cerebral lateralization for processing facial emotion. Neuropsychology 2008, 22:350-356.
11. Broca P. Remarques sur le siége de la faculté du langage articulé, suivies d'une observation d'aphémie (perte de la parole). Bull. Soc. Anatomique Paris 1861, 6:330-357.
12. Chao Y.P., Cho K.H., Yeh C.H., Chou K.H., Chen J.H., Lin C.P. Probabilistic topography of human corpus callosum using cytoarchitectural parcellation and high angular resolution diffusion imaging tractography. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30:3172-3187.
13. Chepuri N.B., Yen Y.F., Burdette J.H., Li H., Moody D.M., Maldjian J.A. Diffusion anisotropy in the corpus callosum. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2002, 23:803-808.
14. Clarke J.M., Zaidel E. Anatomical-behavioral relationships: corpus callosum morphometry and hemispheric specialization. Behav. Brain Res. 1994, 64:185-202.
15. Cook N.D. Homotopic callosal inhibition. Brain Lang. 1984, 23:116-125.
16. Corballis M.C. Mental rotation and the right hemisphere. Brain Lang. 1997, 57:100-121.
17. Doron K.W., Gazzaniga M.S. Neuroimaging techniques offer new perspectives on callosal transfer and interhemispheric communication. Cortex 2008, 44:1023-1029.
18. Fernandez G., Specht K., Weis S., Tendolkar I., Reuber M., Fell J., Klaver P., Ruhlmann J., Reul J., Elger C.E. Intrasubject reproducibility of presurgical language lateralization and mapping using fMRI. Neurology 2003, 60:969-975.
19. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Shah N.J., Weiss P.H., Halligan P.W., Grosse-Ruyken M., Ziemons K., Zilles K., Freund H.J. Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI. Neurology 2000, 54:1324-1331.
20. Floel A., Knecht S., Lohmann H., Deppe M., Sommer J., Drager B., Ringelstein E.B., Henningsen H. Language and spatial attention can lateralize to the same hemisphere in healthy humans. Neurology 2001, 57:1018-1024.
21. Galaburda A.M., Rosen G.D., Sherman G.F. Individual variability in cortical organization: its relationship to brain laterality and implications to function. Neuropsychologia 1990, 28:529-546.
22. Gazzaniga M.S. Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition?. Brain 2000, 123(Pt 7):1293-1326.
23. Gootjes L., Bouma A., Van Strien J.W., Van Schijndel R., Barkhof F., Scheltens P. Corpus callosum size correlates with asymmetric performance on a dichotic listening task in healthy aging but not in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:208-217.
24. Habib M., Gayraud D., Oliva A., Regis J., Salamon G., Khalil R. Effects of handedness and sex on the morphology of the corpus callosum: a study with brain magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Cogn. 1991, 16:41-61.
25. Hines M., Chiu L., McAdams L.A., Bentler P.M., Lipcamon J. Cognition and the corpus callosum: verbal fluency, visuospatial ability, and language lateralization related to midsagittal surface areas of callosal subregions. Behav. Neurosci. 1992, 106:3-14.
26. Isaacs K.L., Barr W.B., Nelson P.K., Devinsky O. Degree of handedness and cerebral dominance. Neurology 2006, 66:1855-1858.
27. Jancke L., Staiger J.F., Schlaug G., Huang Y., Steinmetz H. The relationship between corpus callosum size and forebrain volume. Cereb. Cortex 1997, 7:48-56.
28. Jansen A., Floel A., Deppe M., van Randenborgh J., Drager B., Kanowski M., Knecht S. Determining the hemispheric dominance of spatial attention: a comparison between fTCD and fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2004, 23:168-180.
29. Jansen A., Floel A., Menke R., Kanowski M., Knecht S. Dominance for language and spatial processing: limited capacity of a single hemisphere. NeuroReport 2005, 16:1017-1021.
30. Jansen A., Menke R., Sommer J., Forster A.F., Bruchmann S., Hempleman J., Weber B., Knecht S. The assessment of hemispheric lateralization in functional MRI-robustness and reproducibility. Neuroimage 2006, 33:204-217.
31. Josse G., Seghier M.L., Kherif F., Price C.J. Explaining function with anatomy: language lateralization and corpus callosum size. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:14132-14139.
32. Knecht S., Deppe M., Drager B., Bobe L., Lohmann H., Ringelstein E., Henningsen H. Language lateralization in healthy right-handers. Brain 2000, 123(Pt 1):74-81.
33. Kochunov P., Lancaster J., Thompson P., Toga A.W., Brewer P., Hardies J., Fox P. An optimized individual target brain in the Talairach coordinate system. Neuroimage 2002, 17:922-927.
34. LaMantia A.S., Rakic P. Axon overproduction and elimination in the corpus callosum of the developing rhesus monkey. J. Neurosci. 1990, 10:2156-2175.
35. Lidzba K., Staudt M., Wilke M., Krageloh-Mann I. Visuospatial deficits in patients with early left-hemispheric lesions and functional reorganization of language: consequence of lesion or reorganization?. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1088-1094.
36. McManus I.C., Bryden M.P. The genetics of handedness, cerebral dominance and lateralization. Handbook of Neuropsychology 1992, 115-144. Elsevier, Amsterdam. I. Rapin, S.J. Segalowitz (Eds.).
37. Nowicka A., Tacikowski P. Transcallosal transfer of information and functional asymmetry of the human brain. Laterality 2009, 1-40.
38. O'Kusky J., Strauss E., Kosaka B., Wada J., Li D., Druhan M., Petrie J. The corpus callosum is larger with right-hemisphere cerebral speech dominance. Ann. Neurol. 1988, 24:379-383.
39. Poffenberger A.T. Reaction time to retinal stimulation with special reference to the time lost in conduction through nervous centers. Arch. Psychol. 1912, 23:1-73.
40. Preuss U.W., Meisenzahl E.M., Frodl T., Zetzsche T., Holder J., Leinsinger G., Hegerl U., Hahn K., Moller H.J. Handedness and corpus callosum morphology. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 2002, 116:33-42.
41. Pujol J., Deus J., Losilla J.M., Capdevila A. Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI. Neurology 1999, 52:1038-1043.
42. Rasmussen T., Milner B. The role of early left-brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech functions. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1977, 299:355-369.
43. Ringo J.L., Doty R.W., Demeter S., Simard P.Y. Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. Cereb. Cortex 1994, 4:331-343.
44. Schulte T., Sullivan E.V., Muller-Oehring E.M., Adalsteinsson E., Pfefferbaum A. Corpus callosal microstructural integrity influences interhemispheric processing: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:1384-1392.
45. Steinmetz H., Jancke L., Kleinschmidt A., Schlaug G., Volkmann J., Huang Y. Sex but no hand difference in the isthmus of the corpus callosum. Neurology 1992, 42:749-752.
46. Strauss E., Satz P., Wada J. An examination of the crowding hypothesis in epileptic patients who have undergone the carotid amytal test. Neuropsychologia 1990, 28:1221-1227.
47. Szaflarski J.P., Binder J.R., Possing E.T., McKiernan K.A., Ward B.D., Hammeke T.A. Language lateralization in left-handed and ambidextrous people: fMRI data. Neurology 2002, 59:238-244.
48. Vogel J.J., Bowers C.A., Vogel D.S. Cerebral lateralization of spatial abilities: a meta-analysis. Brain Cogn. 2003, 52:197-204.
49. Westerhausen R., Kreuder F., Dos Santos Sequeira S., Walter C., Woerner W., Wittling R.A., Schweiger E., Wittling W. Effects of handedness and gender on macro- and microstructure of the corpus callosum and its subregions: a combined high-resolution and diffusion-tensor MRI study. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2004, 21:418-426.
50. Westerhausen R., Kreuder F., Dos Santos Sequeira S., Walter C., Woerner W., Wittling R.A., Schweiger E., Wittling W. The association of macro- and microstructure of the corpus callosum and language lateralisation. Brain Lang. 2006, 97:80-90.
51. Westerhausen R., Gruner R., Specht K., Hugdahl K. Functional relevance of interindividual differences in temporal lobe callosal pathways: a DTI tractography study. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:1322-1329.
52. Wilke M., Lidzba K. LI-tool: a new toolbox to assess lateralization in functional MR-data. J. Neurosci. Meth. 2007, 163:128-136.
53. Witelson S.F. The brain connection: the corpus callosum is larger in left-handers. Science 1985, 229:665-668.
54. Witelson S.F. Hand and sex differences in the isthmus and genu of the human corpus callosum. A postmortem morphological study. Brain 1989, 112(Pt 3):799-835.
55. Witelson S.F., Goldsmith C.H. The relationship of hand preference to anatomy of the corpus callosum in men. Brain Res. 1991, 545:175-182.
56. Witelson S.F., Nowakowski R.S. Left out axons make men right: a hypothesis for the origin of handedness and functional asymmetry. Neuropsychologia 1991, 29:327-333.
57. Woermann F.G., Jokeit H., Luerding R., Freitag H., Schulz R., Guertler S., Okujava M., Wolf P., Tuxhorn I., Ebner A. Language lateralization by Wada test and fMRI in 100 patients with epilepsy. Neurology 2003, 61:699-701.
58. Yazgan M.Y., Wexler B.E., Kinsbourne M., Peterson B., Leckman J.F. Functional significance of individual variations in callosal area. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33:769-779.
59. Yetkin F.Z., Swanson S., Fischer M., Akansel G., Morris G., Mueller W., Haughton V. Functional MR of frontal lobe activation: comparison with Wada language results. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1998, 19:1095-1098.
60. Zarei M., Johansen-Berg H., Smith S., Ciccarelli O., Thompson A.J., Matthews P.M. Functional anatomy of interhemispheric cortical connections in the human brain. J. Anat. 2006, 209:311-320.
61. Zhang Y., Brady M., Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2001, 20:45-57.