Legal electronic institutions and ONTOMEDIA: Dialogue, inventio, and relational justice scenarios

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6237 LNAI, Issue M4D, 2010, Pages 184-204

  Casanovas, Pompeu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Dialectic; Dialogue; Electronic Legal Institutions; Inventio; ODR; Relational justice; Rhetoric; Semantic Web; Stasis

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; DIALECTIC; DIALOGUE; ELECTRONIC LEGAL INSTITUTIONS; INVENTIO; ODR; RELATIONAL JUSTICE; RHETORIC; STASIS;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION; ONTOLOGY; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 78649580528     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (69)

1. Noriega, P., López, C.: Toward a platform for Online Mediation. In: Poblet, M., Shield, U., Zeleznikow, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Legal and Negotiation Support Systems 2009, in conjunction with the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2009), Barcelona, June 12. IDT Series, vol. 5, pp. 67-75 (2009), http://www.huygens.es/ site/service4.html, CEUR-482, http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/ CEUR-WS/Vol-482/
2. Poblet, M., Noriega, P., López del Toro, C., Suquet, J.: Mediación en línea: estado del arte y escenarios de uso. In: Casanovas, P., Díaz, L., Magre, J., Poblet, M. (eds.) Materiales del Libro Blanco de la Mediación en Cataluña, Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya, Departament de Justícia, Centre d'Estudis Jurídics i Formació Especialitzada, pp. 159-169 (2009)
3. Casanovas, P., Poblet, M.: Concepts and fields of Relational Justice. In: Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds.) Computable Models of the Law. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4884, pp. 323-339. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
4. Stranieri, A., Yearwood, J., Zeleznikow, J.: Tools for World Wide Web based legal decision support systems. In: ICAIL 2001, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, pp. 206-214. ACM, New York (2001)
5. Tyler, M.C., Bretherton, D.: Seventy-six and Counting: an Analysis of ODR sites. In: Lodder, A., et al. (eds.) Essays on legal and technical aspects of Online Dispute Resolution. Papers from the ICAIL 2003 ODR Workshop, Ediburgh, Scotland, UK, June 28, pp. 13-28 (2003)
6. Thiessen, E., Zeleznikow, J.: Technical Aspects of Online Dispute Resolution: Challenges and Opportunities, Thiessen E and Zeleznikow. J. Technical aspects of ODR: Challenges and opportunities; Conley Tyler, M., Katsh, E., Choi, D. (eds.) In: Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. The International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (2005)
7. Poblet, M., Casellas, N., Torralba, S., Casanovas, P.: Modeling Expert Knowledge in the Mediation Domain: A Middle-out Approach to Design ODR Ontologies. In: Casellas, N., Francesconi, E., Hoekstra, R., Montemagni, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques joint with 2nd Workshop on Semantic Processing of Legal Text (LOAIT 2009), Barcelona, June 8. IDT Series, vol. 1, pp. 19-28 (2009),
8. Poblet, M., Casanovas, P., López-Cobo, J.M.: Online Dispute Resolution for the Next Web Decade: The Ontomedia Approach. In: ITAIS 2009, Sardinia, Costa Esmeralda (October 5, 2009)
9. Poblet, M., Casanovas, P., López-Cobo, Cabrerizo, A., Prieto, J.M.: Mediation, ODR and 2.0: A Case for Relational Justice. In: AICOL 2009 in conjunction with JURIX 2009, Rotterdam, December 16 (2009)
10. Motta, E., Sabou, M.: Next Generation Semantic Web Applications. In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z.-Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) ASWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4185, pp. 24-29. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
11. D'Aquin, M., Motta, E., Sabou, M., Angeletou, S., Gridinoc, L., Lopez, V., Guidi, D.: Toward a new Generation of Semantic Web Applications. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20-28 (May/June 2008)
12. Hendler, J.: Web 3.0 emerging. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 88-90 (January 2009)
13. Casanovas, P.: The future of law: Relational Justice and Second Generation of Semantic Web Services. In: Fernández-Barrera, M., et al. (eds.) The Future of Law, EPAP, Florence (2009)
14. North, D.C.: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
15. Castelfranchi, C.: Limits of strategic Rationality for Agents and M-A Systems. In: Boman, M., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1997. LNCS, vol. 1237. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
16. Searle, J.R.: The construction of social reality. Free Press, New York (1995)
17. Lodder, A.: Dialaw. On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of argumentation. Kluwer A. P., Dordrecht (2001)
18. Gordon, T.: The Pleadings Game. An artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Kluwer A. P., Dordrecht (1995)
19. Zeleznikow, J., Bellucci, E.: Family-Mediator - Adding Notions of Fairness to Those of Interests. In: Engers, T.v. (ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Paris, France, December 7-9, pp. 121-130. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
20. Lodder, A., Zeleznikow, J.: Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three-Step Model. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 10, 287-336 (2005)
21. Bellucci, E., Zeleznikow, J.: Developing Negotiation Decision Support Systems that Support Mediators: A Case Study of the Family-Winner System. AI & Law 13(2), 233-271 (2005)
22. Walton, D.: The Place of Dialogue in Logic Computer Science, and Communication Studies. Synthese 123, 327-346 (2000)
23. Walton, D.: The New Dialectic. Conversational Context of Argument. The University of Toronto Press, Toronto (1995)
24. Sartor, G.: A Teleological Approach to Legal Dialogue. EUI working paper LAW No. 28 (2006)
25. Sloane, T.O.: Reinventing inventio. College English 51(5), 461-473 (1989)
26. Hohmann, H.: The Dynamics of Stasis: Classical Rheorical Theory and Modern egal Argumentation. American Journal of Jurisprudence 34, 171-197 (1989)
27. Leff, M.: Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twenty-First Century. Argumentation 14, 241-254 (2000)
28. Fumaroli, M.: L'Âge de l'éloquence: rhétorique et res literaria de la Renaissance au seuil de l'eacute;poque classique. Droz, Paris (1980)
29. Heath, T.: Logical Grammar, Grammatical Logic, and Humanism in Three German Universities. In: Studies in the Renaissance, vol. 18, pp. 9-64 (1971)
30. Jardine, L.: The Place of Dialectic Teaching in Sixteenth-Century Cambridge. Studies in the Renaissance 21, 31-62 (1974)
31. Hamilton, D.: Instruction in the making: Peter Ramus and the beginning of modern schooling. Annual Convention of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April 21-25 (2003)
32. Grau-Arau, A.: Humanisme i Escolàstica en el Renaixement. Comprendre 2(1), 5-14 (2000)
33. Olmos Gómez, P.: La polémica antiescolástica y la Lógica humanista en la España del siglo XVI. Revista de Hispanismo Filosófico 12, 65-83 (2007)
34. Pozzo, R.: Logic and Metaphysics in German Philosophy from Melanchton to Hegel. In: Seet, W., et al. (eds.) Approaches to Metaphysics, pp. 61-74. Springer, Heidelberg
35. Meerhoff, K.: Logic and Eloquence: A Ramusian Revolution? Argumentation (5), 357-374 (1991)
36. Giuliani, A.: Les règles de la 'discussion légitime' dans la logique de Port-Royal. Argumentation 5, 263-273 (1991)
37. Kelley, D.R.: Jurisconsultus Perfectus: The Lawyer as Renaissance Man. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes (51), 84 (1988)
38. Pozzo, R.: Ramus and Other Renaissance Philosophers on Subjectivity. Topoi (22), 5-13 (2003)
39. Ong, W.J.: Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue. From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Method. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London (1959)
40. Perelman, C.: Pierre de la Ramée et le déclin de la rhétorique. Argumentation 5, 347-356 (1991)
41. Casanovas, P., Poblet, M.: La médiation ou la puissance imaginative du dialogue, Colloques de Cérisy, La Sé rendipité dans les sciences, les arts et la décisión, Juillet 28 (2009)
42. Walton, D.: An Automated System for Argument Invention in Law Using Argumentation and Heuristic Search Procedures. Ratio Juris 18(4), 434-463 (2005)
43. Macagno, F., Walton, D.: Argumentative Reasoning Patterns. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11, 1-43 (2003)
44. van Eemeren, F.H., Houtlosser, P.: Rhetorical Analysis within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework. Argumentation 14, 293-305 (2000)
45. Jackson, S.: Disputation by Design. Argumentation 12, 183-198 (1998)
46. Jacobs, S.: Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: managing disagreement while managing not to disagree. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 1403-1426 (2002)
47. Aakhus, M.: Designing reflective dialogue to support learning from experience. SIGGROUP Bulletin 22(2), 29-37 (2001)
48. Aakhus, M.: Technocratic and Design Stances Toward Communication Expertise: How GDSS Facilitators Understand Their Work. Journal of Applied Communication Research 29(4), 341-371 (2001)
49. Aakhus, M.: Neither Naïve nor Critical Reconstruction: Dispute Mediators, Impasse, and the Design of Argumentation. Argumentation 17, 265-290 (2003)
50. Aakhus, M., Aldrich, A.: Crafting Communication Activity: Understanding Felicity in 'I wish I...' Compliments'. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35(4), 395-425 (2002)
51. Atkinson, C.: Inventing Inventors in Renaissance Europe Polydore Vergil's De inventoribus rerum. Spatmittelalter und Reformation Neue Reihe No. 33. Mohr Siebeck (2007)
52. McNally, J.R.: Rudolph Agricola's De Inventione Dialectica Libri Tres: A Translation of Selected Chapters. Communication Monographs 34(4), 393-422 (1967)
53. MacNally, J.R.: Dux Illa Directrixque Artium: Rudolph's Agricola's Dialectical System. Quartely Journal of Speech 52(4), 337-347 (1966)
54. McNally, J.R.: 'Prima pars dialectica': The Influence of Agricolan Dialectic Upon English Accounts of Invention. Renaissance Quarterly 21(2), 166-177 (1968)
55. McEvoy, S.: Issues in Common Law Pleading and Ancient Rhetoric. Argumentation 5(3), 245-261 (1991)
56. Mack, P.: Agricola's Use of the Comparison between Writing and the Visual Arts. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes (55), 169-179 (1992)
57. Feteris, E.T.: A Survey of 25 Years of Research on Legal Argumentation. Argumentation 11, 355-376 (1997)
58. Thagard, P., Shelley, C.: Abductive reasoning: Logic, visual thinking, and coherence. In: Dalla Chiara, M.L., et al. (eds.) Logic and Scientific Methods, pp. 413-427. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)
59. McEvoy, S.: The Construction of Issues: Pleading Theory and Practice, Relevance in Pragmatics, and the Confrontation Stage in the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Argumentation 13, 43-52 (1999)
60. McEvoy, S.: L'invention defensive. Poétique, linguistique. éditions Métailié, droit., Paris (1995)
61. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
62. Lederach, J.P.: Moral Imagination. The Art and Soul to Building Pace. MIT Press, Cambridge (1966)
63. Casanovas, P., Poblet, M.: Microfoundations of Restorative Justice: A General Framework. In: Mackay, R., Boŝnjak, M., Declerck, J., Pelikan, C., Stokkom, B.v., Wright, M. (eds.) Images of Restorative Justice Theory, pp. 234-258, Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft, Frankfurt am Main (2007)
64. Umbreit, M., Bradshaw, W., Coates, R.B.: Victim Sensitive Offender Dialogue in Crimes of Severe Violence. Differing Needs, Approaches, and Implications, Office for Victims of Crime, U.S., Department of Justice (2001)
65. Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C.M., Pearson, H.W., et al.: Trade and Markets in the Early Empires. Free Press, Glencoe (1957)
66. Aquino, K., Tripp, T., Bies, R.J.: Getting Even or Moving On? Power, Procedural Justice, and Types of Offense as Predictors of Revenge, Forgiveness, Reconciliation, and Avoidance in Organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(3), 653-668 (2006)
67. Goyet, F.: Le Sublime 'lieu commun' : L'Invention Rhétorique dans l'Antiquité et à la Renaissance. Honoré Champion, Paris (1996)
68. Goyet, F.: La prudence : entre sublime et raison détat. In: Cogitore, I., Goyet (dir.), F., Roi, D. (eds.) Essais sur la littérature adressée au Prince, Grenoble, ELLUG, pp. 163-180 (2001)
69. Chase, V.M., Hertwig, R., Gigerenzer, G.: Visions of Rationality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2(6), 206-214 (1998)