Tools for world wide web based legal decision support systems

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 206-214

  Stranieri, Andrew ^a   Yearwood, John ^b   Zeleznikow, John ^a,c  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE MODELLING; LEGAL KNOWLEDGE; MODELING TOOL; RELATIONAL DATABASE; RULE BASED; TARGET DOMAIN; WEB BASED EXPERT SYSTEM; WEB ENVIRONMENT; WEB IMPLEMENTATION; WEB-BASED SYSTEM;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION TREES; EXPERT SYSTEMS; MACHINE DESIGN; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS;

EID: 30344471367     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/383535.383559     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Dixon, A., and Self, L., 1994. Copyright protection for the Information Superhighway. In Firth, A., Lane, S and Smythe, Y. (Eds) 1998. Readings in Intellectual Property. A selection of Articles from EIPR and Ent. L. R. Sweet and Maxwell. London.
2. Johnson, P. and Mead, D. 1991. Legislative knowledge base systems for public administration - Some practical issues. In the Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 108-117, Oxford: ACM Press.
3. Matthijssen, L. J., 1999. Interfacing between lawyers and computers. An architecture for knowledge based interfaces to legal databases. Kluwer Law International. The Netherlands.
4. Richter, K., K., Chicola, J, M., 1999. Digital Rights for Intellectual Property Protection. Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference. Law and Technology (LawTech'99). ACTA Press. pp27-31.
5. Softlaw 2000. http://www.softlaw.com.au
6. Stallman R. 1994 Why Software Should Not Have Owners, at http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-free.html
7. Stefik M. 1997 'Shifting The Possible: How Trusted Systems And Digital Property Rights Challenge Us To Rethink Digital Publishing', Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 12, 1 (Spring 1997.
8. Stranieri, A., 1999. Automating Legal Reasoning in Discretionary Domains. PhD Thesis. LaTrobe University. Victoria. Australia.
9. Stranieri, A., Gawler, M. and Zeleznikow, J. 1994a. Toulmin structures as a higher level abstraction for hybrid reasoning. In the Proceedings of the Seventh Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence AI'94. University of New England. Armidale, Australia : 203-210.
10. Stranieri, A., Massey, P. and Zeleznikow, J. 1994b. Inferencing with legal knowledge represented as diagrams, in Williams A.W.F (ed) Poster Proceedings of the Seventh Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence AI'94. University of New England. Armidale, Australia 25-32.
11. Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., Gawler, M. and Lewis, B. 1999. A hybrid - neural approach to the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(2-3):153-183.
12. Stranieri, A., and Zeleznikow, J., 1999. The evaluation of legal knowledge based systems. Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ICAIL'99 ACM Press. Pp 18-24.
13. Stranieri, A., and Zeleznikow, J. 1999. A survey of argumentation structures for intelligent decision support. in Burstein, R. (Ed) Proceedings of International Society for Decision Support Systems Fifth International Conference ISDSS'99. Monash University, Melbourne.
14. Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., and Yearwood, J., 2001. Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical with monolectical reasoning. Technical Report. Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering. La Trobe University. (http://www.cs.latrobe.edu.au/research/dbc/)
15. Stranieri, A. and Zeleznikow, J. 2001. Copyright regulation in cyber-space: the case for a knowledge based approach. To appear in Information and Communications Technology Law
16. Toulmin, S. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge
17. Waismann, F., 1951. Verifiability. (in) Flew, A (Ed). Logic and Language. Blackwell.
18. Yearwood, J., and Stranieri, A., 1999. The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based system Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ICAIL'99 ACM Press. Pp 117-137
19. Yearwood, J., Stranieri, A., and Anjaria, C. 1999. The use of argumentation to assist in the generation of legal documents. ADCS'99 Fourth Australasian Document Computing Symposium Southern Cross University Press, NSW, Australia.
20. Yearwood, J., and Stranieri, A., 2000. An argumentation shell for knowledge based systems. Proceedings of IASTED International conference on Law and Technology. pp105-111.
21. Zeleznikow, J. 2000. Building Judicial Decision Support Systems in Discretionary Legal Domains. International Review of Computers, Law and Information Technology 14(3): 341-356.
22. Zeleznikow, J. and Stranieri, A. 1995. The Split Up system: Integrating neural networks and rule based reasoning in the legal domain. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence & Law. ICAIL'95. ACM Press. New York. pp185-194.
23. Zeleznikow, J. and Stranieri, A. 1997. Knowledge Discovery in the Split-Up Project. Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM: 89-97.