Radiation Risks in Perspective

Radiation Risks in Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-209

  Mossman, Kenneth L ^a  

^a School of Life Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649577479     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780849379789     Document Type: Book

References (211)

1. National Research Council, Committee on Developmental Toxicology, Scientific Frontiers in Developmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2000.
2. National Cancer Institute, Interventional Fluoroscopy: Reducing Radiation Risks for Patients and Staff, NIH Publication No. 05-5286, March 2005.
3. Mossman, K.L., Analysis of risk in computerized tomography and other diagnostic radiology procedures, Computerized Radiology, 6, 251, 1982.
4. Ropeik, D. and Gray, G., Risk: A Practical Guide for Deciding What’s Really Safe and What’s Really Dangerous in the World around You, Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, 2002.
5. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures 2005, American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GA, 2005.
6. Beck, M. et al., “The Tylenol Scare, " Newsweek. October 11, 1982.
7. Lowrance, W.W., Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety, William Kaufmann, Inc., Los Altos, CA, 1976.
8. National Research Council, Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1983.
9. Hill, A.B., The environment and diseases: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58, 295, 1965.
10. The Insight Team of the Sunday Times of London, Suffer The Children: The Story of Thalidomide, The Viking Press, New York, 1979.
11. Environmental Protection Agency, Updated Draft of Guidelines for Carcinogenic Risk Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, 1999.
12. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html (accessed March 2006).
13. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program, Report on Carcinogens, 9th ed., 2000.
14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program, Report on Carcinogens, 11th ed., 2005.
15. Sexton, K., Needham, L.L., and Pirkle, J.L., Human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals, American Scientist, 92, 38, 2004.
16. Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, Risk Assessment and Risk Management in Regulatory Decision-Making, Final Report Volumes 1 and 2, 1997. http://www.riskworld.com/riskcommission/Default.html (accessed March 2006).
17. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, White Paper on Risk-Informed and Performance-Based Regulation, SECY-98-144, June 22, 1998, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/commission/secys/1998/secy1998-144/1998-144scy.html#ATTACHMENT (accessed March 2006).
18. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Medical use of byproduct material; policy statement, revision, Federal Register, 65, 150, 47654, August 3, 2000.
19. Vetter, R.J., Medical health physics: A review, Health Physics, 88, 653, 2005.
20. Gigerenzer, G., Calculated Risks: How to Know When Numbers Deceive You, Simon and Schuster, New York, 2002.
21. Myers, D.G., Do we fear the right things? Skeptic, 10, 1, 56, 2003.
22. Slovic, P., The Perception of Risk, Earthscan Publications, Ltd., London, 2000.
23. Watson, J.E. and Crick, F.H.C., A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid, Nature, 171, 737, 1953.
24. Popper, K.R., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Basic Books, New York, 1959.
25. Lipton, P., Testing hypotheses: prediction and prejudice, Science, 307, 219, January 14, 2005.
26. Puskin, J.S., Smoking as a confounder in ecologic correlations of cancer mortality rates with average county radon levels, Health Physics, 84, 526, 2003.
27. Cohen, B.L., The Puskin observation on smoking as a confounder in ecologic correlations of cancer mortality rates with average county radon levels, Health Physics, 86, 203, 2004.
28. Puskin, J.S., James, A.C., and Nelson, N.S., Response to Cohen. Health Physics, 86, 204, 2004.
29. National Research Council, The Effects on Populations to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR III Report, National Academy Press, Washington, 1980.
30. Pierce, D. et al., Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, Report 12, Part 1, Cancer, 1950-1990; Radiation Research, 146, 1, 1996.
31. Calabrese, E.J. and L.A. Baldwin, Toxicology rethinks its central belief: Hormesis demands a reappraisal of the way risks are assessed, Nature, 421, 691, February 13, 2003.
32. Kaiser, J., Sipping from a poisoned chalice, Science, 302, 376, October 17, 2003.
33. National Research Council, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII Report, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
34. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR, 1994 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, United Nations, New York, 1994.
35. Mossman, K.L., Deconstructing radiation hormesis, Health Physics, 80, 263, 2001.
36. Cardis, E. et al., Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries, BMJ, 331, 77, 2005.
37. Evans, R.D. et al., Radiogenic effects in man of long-term skeletal alpha-irradiation, Radiobiology of Plutonium, Stover, B.J. and Jee, W.S.S., Eds., The J.W. Press, Salt Lake City, UT, 431, 1972.
38. Mays, C.W. and Lloyd, R.D., Bone sarcoma incidence vs. alpha particle dose, Radiobiology of Plutonium, Stover, B.J. and Jee, W.S.S., Eds., The J.W. Press, Salt Lake City, UT, 409, 1972.
39. Rowland, R.E. et al., Dose-response relationships for female radium dial workers, Radiation Research, 76, 368, 1978.
40. National Research Council. Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR V Report, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1990.
41. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Radiological criteria for license termination, Federal Register, 62, 39058, 1997.
42. Mossman, K.L., The linear no threshold debate: Where do we go from here?, Medical Physics, 25, 279, 1998.
43. Albanes, D. et al., A survey of physicians’ breast cancer early detection practices, Preventive Medicine, 17, 643, 1988.
44. Trichopoulos, D. et al., The victims of Chernobyl in Greece: Induced abortions after the accident, BMJ, 295, 1100, 1987.
45. Lowrance, W.W., Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety, William Kaufmann, Inc., Los Altos, CA, 1976.
46. Gigerenzer, G., Calculated Risks: How to Know When Numbers Deceive You, Simon and Schuster, New York, 2002.
47. Tubiana, M., Dose-effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: The joint report of the Academie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Academie Nationale de Medecine, Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., 63, 317, 2005.
48. National Research Council, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII Report, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
49. Muller, H.J., Artificial transmutation of the gene, Science, 66, 84, 1927.
50. Muller, H.J., The nature of the genetic effects produced by radiation. In Hollaender, A., Ed., Radiation Biology, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 351, 1954.
51. Muller, H.J., The manner of production of mutations by radiation. In Hollaender, A., Ed., Radiation Biology, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 475, 1954.
52. Russell, W.L., Genetic effects of radiation in mammals. In Hollaender, A., Ed., Radiation Biology, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 825, 1954.
53. Carlson, E. A., Genes Radiation and Society: The Life and Work of H. J. Muller. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1981.
54. Timofeeff-Ressovsky, N.V., Zimmer, K.G., and Delbruck, M., Uber die natur der genmutation und der genstruktur. Vierter teil: Theorie der genmutation und der genstruktur, Nachr Ges Wiss Gottingen Math Physik Kl Fachgruppe VI, 1, 156, 1935.
55. National Research Council, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII Report, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
56. Mossman, K.L. A brief history of radiation bioeffects. In Health Effects of Exposure to Low-Level Ionizing Radiation, Hendee, W.R., and Edwards, F.M., Eds., Institute of Physics Publishing, Philadelphia, PA, 1996.
57. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program, Report on Carcinogens, 11th ed., 2005.
58. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, http://monographs.iarc.fr/monoeval/crthall.html (accessed March 2006).
59. Lewis, E. B., Leukemia and ionizing radiation, Science, 125, 965, 1957.
60. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Principles and Applications of Collective Dose in Radiation Protection, NCRP Report No. 121, Bethesda, MD, NCRP, 1995.
61. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Uncertainties in Fatal Cancer Risk Estimates Used in Radiation Protection, NCRP Report No. 126, Bethesda, MD, NCRP, 1997.
62. National Academy of Medicine, Dose Effect Relationships and Estimation of the Carcinogenic Effects of Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation, March 2005, http://www.academie-sciences.fr/publications/rapports/pdf/dose_ effet_07_04_05_gb.pdf (accessed March 2006).
63. Tubiana, M., Dose-effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: the joint report of the Academie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Academie Nationale de Medecine, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics, 63, 317, 2005.
64. Benninson, D., Sievert lecture: Risk of radiation at low doses, Proceedings of the 1996 International Congress on Radiation Protection, 1, 17, 1996.
65. Billen, D., Spontaneous DNA damage and its significance for the “negligible dose” controversy in radiation protection, Radiation Research, 124, 242, 1990.
66. Boice, J.D., Risk estimates for radiation exposure, in Health Effects of Exposure to Low-Level Ionizing Radiation, Hendee, W.R., and Edwards, F.M., Eds., The Institute of Medical Physics Publishing, Bristol, 237, 1996.
67. Anspaugh, L.R., Catlin, R.J., and Goldman, M. The global impact of the Chernobyl reactor accident, Science, 242, 1513, 1988.
68. National Research Council, Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR V Report, National Academy Press, Washington, 1990.
69. Brenner, D. J. et al., Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT, American Journal of Roentgenology, 176, 289, 2001.
70. Pasternak, A., A national solution for a national problem, Radwaste Solutions, 28, September/October 2003.
71. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Implementation of the Principle of as Low as Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) for Medical and Dental Personnel, NCRP Report 107, NCRP, Bethesda, MD, 1990.
72. National Research Council, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII Report, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
73. National Research Council, The Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: 1980, BEIR III Report, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1980.
74. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment, EPA/630/P-03/001, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC, March 2005.
75. National Research Council, Radiation Dose Reconstruction for Epidemiologic Uses, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1995;
76. Benninson, D., The Sievert Lecture: Risk of Radiation at Low Doses, Proceedings of the 1996 International Congress on Radiation Protection, Vol. 1, 19, 1996.
77. Mossman, K.L. and Marchant, G.E., The precautionary principle and radiation protection, Risk: Health, Safety and Environment, 13, 137, 2002.
78. Hatch, M.C. et al., Cancer near the Three Mile Island nuclear plant: radiation emissions, American Journal of Epidemiology, 132, 392, 1990.
79. Hatch, M.C. et al., Cancer rates after the Three Mile Island nuclear accident and proximity of residence to the plant, American Journal of Public Health, 81, 719, 1991.
80. Ron, E. et al., Thyroid cancer after exposure to external radiation: A pooled analysis of seven studies, Radiation Research, 141, 259, 1995.
81. Knox, E.G. et al., Prenatal irradiation and childhood cancer, Journal of Radiological Protection, 7, 177, 1987.
82. Brenner, D.J. et al., Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 13761, 2003.
83. Pierce, D.A. et al., Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950-1990, Radiation Research, 146, 1, 1996.
84. Little, M.P. and Muirhead, C.R., Evidence for curvilinearity in the cancer incidence dose-response in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors, International Journal of Radiation Biology, 70, 83, 1996.
85. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), Uncertainties in Fatal Cancer Risk Estimates Used in Radiation Protection, NCRP Report No. 126, NCRP, Bethesda, MD, 1997.
86. Mole, P., Ockham’s razor cuts both ways: The uses and abuses of simplicity in scientific theories, Skeptic, 10, 40, 2003.
87. Sankaranarayanan, K. and Chakraborty, R., Impact of cancer predisposition and radiosensitivity on the population risk of radiation-induced cancers, Radiation Research, 156, 648, 2001.
88. Environmental Protection Agency, Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclides, Federal Guidance Report No. 13, EPA 402-R-99-001, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, September 1999. http://www.epa.gov/radiation/docs/federal/402-r-99-001.pdf (accessed March 2006).
89. National Research Council, Health Effects of Exposure to Radon, BEIR VI Report, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999.
90. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Office of Communications, New York City’s Smoking Rate Declines Rapidly from 2002 to 2003, the Most Significant One-Year Drop Ever Recorded, May 12, 2004.
91. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), Exposure of the Population in the United States and Canada from Natural Background Radiation. NCRP Report No. 94. NCRP, Bethesda, MD, 1987.
92. Coglianese, C. and Marchant, G.E., Shifting sands: the limits of science in setting risk standards, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 152(4), 1255, April 2004.
93. National Research Council, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII Report, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
94. Mossman, K.L., Radiation protection of radiosensitive populations, Health Physics, 72, 519, 1997.
95. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, ICRP Publication 79, Elsevier Science, Oxford, 1998.
96. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Report of the NCI-CDC Working Group to Revise the 1985 NIH Radioepidemiological Tables, 2003;
97. Johnson, RH., The radioepidemiological tables in radiation litigation, in Mossman, K.L. and Mills, W.A. (Eds.), The Biological Basis of Radiation Protection Practice, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 158, 1992.
98. Slovic, P., Perception of risk, Science, 236, 280, 1987.
99. Lowrance, W.W., Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety, William Kaufmann, Inc., Los Altos, CA, 1976.
100. Salazar-Lindo, E. et al., The Peruvian cholera epidemic and the role of chlorination in its control and prevention, in Safety of Water Disinfection: Balancing Chemical and Microbial Risks, Craun, G.F. (Ed.), 403, ILSI Press, Washington, DC, 1993.
101. Bate, R., How precaution kills. The demise of DDT and the resurgence of malaria, in Politicizing Science, Gough, M. (Ed.), Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA, 261, 2003.
102. Bradley, M.O., For fearful residents, there was no script. The Patriot-News, March 31, 2004. http://www.pennlive.com/news/patriotnews/index.ssf?/news/tmi/stories/forfearful.html (accessed March 2006).
103. Brodeur, P., Annals of radiation -The hazards of electromagnetic fields (Part IPower lines), The New Yorker, 51, June 12, 1989.
104. Brodeur, P., Annals of radiation -The hazards of electromagnetic fields (Part II-Something is happening), The New Yorker, 47, June 19, 1989.
105. Brodeur, P., Annals of radiation -The hazards of electromagnetic fields (Part III-Video display terminals), The New Yorker, 39, June 26, 1989.
106. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Health Effects of Low-Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields, ORAU 92/F8, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Washington, DC, 1992.
107. Fiorino, D.J., Technical and democratic values in risk analysis, Risk Analysis, 9, 293, 1989.
108. Ledwidge, L., Moore, L., and Crawford, L., Stakeholder perspectives on radiation protection, Health Physics, 87, 293, 2004.
109. Proctor, R.N., The Nazi War on Cancer, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1999.
110. Kraus, N., Maimfors, T., and Slovic, P., Intuitive toxicology: Expert and lay judgments of chemical risks, Risk Analysis, 12, 215, 1992.
111. Barke, R.P. and Jenkins-Smith, H.C., Politics and scientific expertise: Scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy, Risk Analysis, 13(4), 425, 1993.
112. Stelfox, H.T. et al., Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists, New England Journal of Medicine, 338(2), 101, January 8, 1998.
113. Levine, J. et al., Authors’ financial relationships with the food and beverage industry and their published positions on the fat substitute olestra, American Jornal of Public Health, 93(4), 664, 2003.
114. Wilson, R. and Crouch, E.A.C., Risk Benefit Analysis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
115. Wiedemann, P.M. and Shutz, H., The precautionary principle and risk perception: Experimental studies in the EMF area, Environmental Health Perspectives, 113, 402, 2005.
116. Raffensperger, C. and Tickner, J.A., Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle, Island Press, Washington, DC, 1999.
117. European Commission, Communication for the Commission on the Precautionary Principle; 2000.
118. Graham, J.D. and Weiner, J.B., Confronting risk tradeoffs. In Graham, J.D. and Weiner, J.B. (Eds.), Risk vs. Risk, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1, 1995.
119. Gray, G.M. and Hammitt, J.K., Risk/risk trade-offs in pesticide regulation: an exploratory analysis of the public health effects of a ban on organophosphate and carbamate pesticides, Risk Analysis, 20, 665, 2000.
120. Gigerenzer, G., Dread risk, September 11, and fatal traffic accidents, Psychological Science, 15, 286, 2004.
121. Hites, R.A. et al,. Global assessment of organic contaminants in farmed salmon, Science, 303, 226, January 9, 2004.
122. Gray, G.M. and Hammitt, J.K., Risk/risk trade-offs in pesticide regulation: an exploratory analysis of the public health effects of a ban on organophosphate and carbamate pesticides, Risk Analysis, 20, 665, 2000.
123. Whicker, F.W. et al., Avoiding destructive remediation at DOE sites, Science, 303, 1615, March 12, 2004.
124. Marchant, G.E. and Mossman, K.L., Arbitrary and Capricious: The Precautionary Principle in the European Union, AEI Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
125. Doll, R. and Peto, R. The causes of cancer: Quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 66, 1191, 1981.
126. Slovic, P., Perception of risk, Science, 236, 280, 1987.
127. Schuler, E., The public has its own view of what is a risk, Nature, 425, 343, 25, September 2003.
128. Easterbrook, G., The Progress Paradox: How Life Gets Better While People Feel Worse, Random House, New York, 2003.
129. Wilson, R. and Crouch, E.A.C., Risk-Benefit Analysis, 2nd edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2001
130. Sunstein, C.R., Risk and Reason, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
131. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science, 211, 453, 1981.
132. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., Availability: A heuristic for judging frequencies and probabilities, Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207, 1973.
133. Gigerenzer, G., Dread risk, September 11, and fatal traffic accidents, Psychological Science, 15, 286, 2004.
134. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science, 185, 1124, 1974.
135. Slovic, P., The Perception of Risk, Earthscan, London, 2000.
136. Wilson, R. and Crouch, E.A.C., Risk-Benefit Analysis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
137. Barrett, J., Pay now to save later, Newsweek, September 26, 2005.
138. Dudley, W.C. and Lee, M., Tsunami!, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 1988.
139. Mossman, K.L., Restructuring nuclear regulations, Environmental Health Perspectives, 111, 13, 2003.
140. National Research Council, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII Report, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
141. Safe, S., Endocrine disruptors. In Gough, M. (Ed.), Politicizing Science: The Alchemy of Policymaking, The Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA, 91, 2003.
142. Mokdad, A.H. et al., Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 1238, 2004.
143. Schiller, J.T. and Davies, P., Delivering on the promise: HPV vaccines and cervical cancer, Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2, 343, 2004.
144. Tengs, T.O. et al., Five hundred life saving interventions and their cost effectiveness, Risk Analysis, 15, 369, 1995.
145. Mossman, K.L., Restructuring nuclear regulations, Environmental Health Perspectives, 111, 13, 2003.
146. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Office of Communications, New York City’s Smoking Rate Declines Rapidly from 2002 to 2003, the Most Significant One-Year Drop Ever Recorded, May 12, 2004.
147. Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, Risk Assessment and Risk Management in Regulatory Decision-Making, Final Report Volumes 1 and 2, 1997. http://www.riskworld. com/riskcommission/Default.html (accessed March 2006).
148. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures 2005, American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, 2005.
149. Abelson, P., Uncertainties about health effects of radon, Science, 250, (4979), 353, 1990.
150. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures, 2005, American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GA, 2005.
151. National Research Council, Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR V Report, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1990.
152. National Research Council, Health Effects of Exposure to Radon., BEIR VI Report, National Academy Ruve, Washington, DC, 1992.
153. Brenner, D.J. et al., Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 13761, 2003.
154. Mossman K.L. et al., Bridging Radiation Policy and Science: Final Report of an International Conference, Bridging Radiation Policy and Science Conference, McLean, VA, 2000.
155. Ghiassi-Nejad, M. et al., Very high background radiation areas of Ramsar, Iran: Preliminary biological studies, Health Physics, 82, 87, 2002.
156. National Research Council, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII Report, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
157. Gribble, G.W., Amazing organohalogens, American Scientist, 92, 342, 2004.
158. Adler, H.I. and Weinberg, A.M., An approach to setting radiation standards, Health Physics, 34, 719, 1978.
159. Mossman, K.L., The linear no-threshold debate: Where do we go from here?, Medical Physics, 25, 279, 1998.
160. Clarke, R.H., Control of low level radiation exposure: Time for a change?, Journal of Radiological Protection, 19, 107, 1999.
161. Health Physics Society Position Statement, Ionizing Radiation-Safety Standards for the General Public, June 2003. http://hps.org/documents/publicdose03.pdf (accessed March 2006).
162. Alexskhin, R.M. et al., Large Radiation Accidents: Consequences and Protective Countremeasures, IzdAT Publisher, Moscow, 2004.
163. Lubin, J.H. and J.D. Boice Jr., Lung cancer risk from residential radon: Meta-analysis of eight epidemiological studies, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 89, 49, 1997.
164. Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, Risk Assessment and Risk Management in Regulatory Decision-Making, Final Report Volumes 1 and 2, 1997. http://www.riskworld.com/riskcommission/Default.html (accessed March 2006).
165. Eichholz, G.G., Human exposure, in Cothern, C.R. and Smith, J.E. (Eds.), Environmental Radon, Plenum Press, New York, 1987, 131.
166. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Assessment of Risks from Radon in Homes, EPA 402-R-03-003, U.S. EPA, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, Washington, DC, June 2003.
167. Nero, A.V., Controlling indoor air pollution, Scientific American, 258, 42, 1988.
168. National Research Council, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII Report, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
169. Gerusky, T.M., The Pennsylvania Radon Study, Journal of Environmental Health, 49, 197, 1986.
170. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures 2005, American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, 2005.
171. National Research Council, Health Effects of Exposure to Radon, BEIR VI Committee Report, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999.
172. Lubin, J. and Boice, J.D., Lung cancer risks from residential radon: Meta-analysis of eight epidemiological studies. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 89, 49, 1997.
173. Krewski, D. et al., Risk of lung cancer in North America associated with residential radon, Epidemiology, 16, 137, 2005.
174. Lubin, J. et al., Risk of lung cancer and residential radon in China: pooled results of two studies, International Journal of Cancer, 109, 132, 2004.
175. Darby, S. et al., Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies, British Medical Journal, 330(7485), 223, 2005.
176. Puskin, J., Smoking as a confounder in ecological correlations of cancer mortality rates with average county radon levels, Health Physics, 84, 526, 2003.
177. EPA report presents new radon risk estimates, Health Physics News, 32(1), 1, January 2004.
178. U.S. EPA, A Citizen’s Guide to Radon, second edition, EPA Air and Radiation Report ANR-464, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC, 1992.
179. Cothern, C.R., Widespread apathy and the public’s reaction to information concerning the health effects of indoor air radon concentrations, Cell Biology and Toxicology, 6, 315, 1990.
180. Farhar, B.C., Trends in U.S. public perception and preferences on energy and environmental policy, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 19, 211, 1994.
181. Government Accounting Office, Research and Regulatory Efforts on Mobile Phone Health Issues, GAO-01-545, General Accounting Office, Washington, DC, 2001.
182. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures 2005, American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GA, 2005.
183. Elwood, J.M., A critical review of epidemiologic studies of radiofrequency exposure and human cancer, Environmental Health Perspectives, 107 (Suppl. 1), 155, 1999.
184. Moulder, J.E. et al., Cell phones and cancer: what is the evidence for a connection?, Radiation Research, 151, 513, 1999.
185. Hardell, L. et al., Use of cellular telephones and the risk for brain tumors: a casecontrol study, International Journal of Oncology, 15, 113, 1999.
186. Hardell, L. et al., Cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for brain tumors, European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 11, 377, 2002.
187. Hill, A.B., The environment and disease: association or causation?, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58, 295, 1965.
188. Moulder, J.E., Cell phones and cancer: what is the evidence for a connection?, Radiation Research, 151, 513, 1999.
189. Lonn, S. et al., Mobile phone use and the risk of acoustic neuroma, Epidemiology, 15, 653, 2004.
190. Savitz, D.A., Mixed signals on cell phones and cancer, Epidemiology, 15, 651, 2004.
191. Balzano, Q. and Sheppard, A.R., The influence of the precautionary principle on science-based decision-making: questionable applications to risks of radiofrequency fields, Journal of Risk Research, 5, 351, 2002.
192. Health Council of the Netherlands, Mobile Telephones: An Evaluation of Health Effects, Publication no. 2002/01E, Health Council of the Netherlands, The Hague, 2002.
193. Wiedemann, P.M. and Schutz, H., The precautionary principle and risk perception: Experimental studies in the EMF area, Environmental Health Perspectives, 113, 402, April 2005.
194. Commission of the European Communities (CEC), Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle, CEC, Brussels, 2000.
195. Mossman, K.L. and Marchant, G.E., The precautionary principle and radiation protection, Risk: Health, Safety and Environment, 13, 137, 2002.
196. Cohen, J.T. and Graham, J.D., A revised economic analysis of restrictions on the use of cell phones while driving, Risk Analysis, 23(1), 5, 2003.
197. Marchant, G.E. and Mossman, K.L., Arbitrary and Capricious: The Precautionary Principle in the European Union Courts, AEI Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
198. National Conference of State Legislatures, Cell Phones and Highway Safety 2005 State Legislative Update, National Conference of State Legislatures, Denver, CO, 2005.
199. Burgess, A., Cellular Phones, Public Fears, and a Culture of Precaution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.
200. National Research Council, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII Report, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005.
201. Mossman, K.L., Radiation protection of human subjects in research protocols, in Mossman, K.L. and Mills, W.A. (Eds.), The Biological Basis of Radiation Protection Practice, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1992, 255.
202. Luch, A., Nature and nurture -Lessons from chemical carcinogenesis, Nature Reviews Cancer, 5, 113, 2005.
203. Jaffe, H., Whatever happened to the U.S. AIDS epidemic?, Science, 305, 1243, August 27, 2004.
204. Dennis, P.A., Disparities in cancer funding, Science, 305, 1401, September 3, 2004.
205. EPA, National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Arsenic and Clarifications to Compliance and New Source Contaminants Monitoring, Federal Register, 66 (14), 6975, January 22, 2001.
206. Mossman, K.L. and Marchant, G.E., Radiation protection and the precautionary principle, Risk: Health, Safety and Environment, 13, 137, 2002.
207. Marchant, G.E. and Mossman, K.L., Arbitrary and Capricious: The Precautionary Principle in the European Courts, AEI Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
208. Weidemann, P.M. and Schütz, H., The precautionary principle and risk perception: Experimental studies in the EMF area, Environmental Health Perspectives, 113, 402, April 2005.
209. Ray, D.L., Trashing the Planet, Regnery Gateway, Washington, 1990.
210. Whelan, E.M., Toxic Terror, Prometheus Books, New York, 1993.
211. Marchant, G.E. and Mossman, K.L., Please be careful: The spread of Europe’s precautionary principle could wreak havoc on economies, public health, and plain old common sense, Legal Times, XXVII (33), 58, August 15, 2005.