Misalignment as a therapeutic resource

Qualitative Research in Psychology

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 299-315

  Voutilainen, Liisa ^a   Peräkylä, Anssi ^a   Ruusuvuori, Johanna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b FINNISH INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH   (Finland)

Author keywords

Alliance ruptures; Cognitive psychotherapy; Conversation analysis; Emotion; Misalignment

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649559901     PISSN: 14780887     EISSN: 14780895     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14780880902846411     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Antaki, C 2008, 'Formulations in psychotherapy', in A Peräkylä, C Antaki, S Vehviläinen & I Leudar (eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy, pp. 42-62, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
2. Antaki, C, Barnes, R & Leudar, I 2005, 'Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy', Discourse Studies, vol. 7, pp. 627-47.
3. Arminen, I 2005, Institutional interaction, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
4. Beck, AT 1976. Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders, International Universities Press, New York.
5. Buttny, D 1996, 'Client's and therapists' joint construction of the client's problems', Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 29, pp. 125-53.
6. Davis, K 1986, 'The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy', Sociology of Health and Illness, vol. 8, pp. 44-74.
7. Drew, P & Heritage, J 1992, 'Analyzing talk at work: an introduction', in P Drew & J Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings, pp. 3-65, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
8. Edwards, D 2000, 'Extreme case formulations: softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral', Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 33, pp. 347-73.
9. Greenberg, L & Safran, J 1987, Emotion in psychotherapy: affect, cognition and the process of change, Guilford Press, New York.
10. Guidano, V 1991, The self in process, Guilford Press, New York.
11. Horvath, AO & Symonds, BD 1991, 'Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis', Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 38, pp. 139-49.
12. Hutchby, I 2005, '"Active listening": Formulations and the elicitation of feeling-talk in child councelling', Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 38, pp. 303-29.
13. Jefferson, G 1988, 'On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation', Social Problems, vol. 35, pp. 418-41.
14. Jefferson, G & Lee, J 1992, 'The rejection of advise: managing the problematic convergence of a "troubles-telling" and a "service encounter"', in P Drew & J Heritage (eds.), Talk at work, pp. 521-571, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Lerner, GH 1991, 'On the syntax of sentences in progress', Language in Society, vol. 20, pp. 441-58.
16. Martin, DJ, Garske, JP & Davis, MK 2000, 'Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review', Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, vol. 68, pp. 438-50.
17. Peräkylä, A 2004, 'Making links in psychoanalytic interpretations: a conversation analytic view', Psychotherapy Research, vol. 14, pp. 289-307.
18. Peräkylä, A 2008, 'Conversation analysis and psychoanalysis: interpretation, affect and intersubjec-tivity', in A Peräkylä, C Antaki, S Vehviläinen & I Leudar (eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy, pp. 100-119, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
19. Peräkylä, A, Antaki, C, Vehviläinen, S & Leudar, I 2008, 'Analyzing psychotherapy in practice', in A Peräkylä, C Antaki, S Vehviläinen & I Leudar (eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy, pp. 5-25, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
20. Pomerantz, A 1984, 'Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn-shapes', in JM Atkinson & J Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, pp. 57-101, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
21. Ruusuvuori, J 2005, '"Empathy" and "sympathy" in action: attending to patients' troubles in Finnish homeopathic and general practice consultations', Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 68, pp. 204-222.
22. Ruusuvuori, J 2007, 'Managing affect. Integration of empathy and problem solving in health care encounters', Discourse Studies, vol. 9, pp. 597-622.
23. Ruusuvuori, J & Voutilainen, L 2009, 'Comparing interaction in different types of health care encounter', in M Haakana, M Laakso & J Lindström (eds.), Talk in interaction. Comparative dimensions, pp. 206-230, Finnish Literature Society, Studia Fennica Linguistica, Helsinki, Finland.
24. Safran, JD & Muran, JC 2006, 'Has the concept of the alliance outlived its usefulness?' Psychotherapy, vol. 43, pp. 286-91.
25. Safran, JD, Muran, JC, Wallner Samstag, L & Stevens, C 2001, 'Repairing therapeutic alliance ruptures', Psychotherapy, vol. 38, pp. 406-12.
26. Safran, JD & Segal, ZV 1990, Interpersonal process in cognitive therapy, Basic Books, New York.
27. Schegloff, E 2006, Sequence organization in interaction: a primer in conversation analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. Stiles, WB 2008, 'Foreword: filling the gaps', in A Peräkylä, C Antaki, S Vehviläinen & I Leudar (eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy, pp. 1-4, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
29. Toskala, A & Hartikainen, K 2005, Minuuden rakentuminen. Psyykkinen kehitys ja kognitiivis-konstruktiivinen psykoterapia [Construction of the self. Mental development and cognitive-constructivist psychotherapy], Jyväskylän koulutuskeskus, Jyväskylä, Finland.
30. Vehviläinen, S 2003, 'Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction', Text, vol. 23, pp. 573-606.
31. Voutilainen, L, Peräkylä, A & Ruusuvuori, J 2010, 'Recognition and interpretation: responding to emotional experience in psychotherapy', Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 43, pp. 85-107.