Expository discourse in school-age children and adolescents with language disorders: Nature of the problem

Expository Discourse in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: Development and Disorders

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 155-190

  Ward Lonergan, Jeannene M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649499436     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203848821     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. Anderson, V., & Roit, M. (1993). Planning and implementing collaborative strategy instruction for delayed readers in grades 6–10. Elementary School Journal, 94, 121–137.
2. Applebee, A., Langer, J., Mullis, I., Latham, A., & Gentile, C. (1994). NAEP, 1992 writing report card(Report No. 23-W01). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
3. Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1982). Producing considerate expository texts; or easy reading is damned hard writing(Reading Education Report No. 46). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
4. Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1988). On selecting “considerate” content area textbooks. Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 47–52.
5. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Hamilton, R., & Kucan, L. (1998). Getting at the meaning: How to help students unpack difficult text. American Educator, 22(1 & 2), 66–71, 85.
6. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A. (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 251–276.
7. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1984, April). Reconstruction of cognitive skills. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
8. Bernhardt, E., Destino, T., Kamil, M., & Rodriguez-Munoz, M. (1995). Assessing science knowledge in an English-Spanish bilingual elementary school. Cognosos, 4, 4–6.
9. Blair, T., & Crump, D. (1984). Effects of discourse mode on the syntactic complexity of learning disabled students’ written expression. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 19–29.
10. Bos, C. S., & Filip, D. (1984). Comprehension monitoring in learning disabled and average students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(4), 229–233.
11. Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macro rules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,22, 1–14.
12. Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968–989.
13. Burke, J. (2000). Reading reminders: Tools, tips, and techniques. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
14. Case, R. (1974). Structures and strictures: Some functional limitations on the course of cognitive growth. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 544–573.
15. Copmann, K. S. P., & Griffith, P. L. (1994). Event and story structure recall by children with specific learning disabilities, language impairments, and normally achieving children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 231–248.
16. Daniels, S., & Zemelman, H. (2004). Subjects matter: Every teacher’s guide to content area reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
17. Danner, F. W. (1976). Children’s understanding of intersentence organization in the recall of short descriptive passage. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 174–183.
18. Day, J. D., & Zajakowski, A. (1991). Comparisons of learning ease and transfer propensity in poor and average readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(7), 421–426, 433.
19. Denti, L., & Guerin, G. (1999). Dropout prevention: A case for enhanced early literacy efforts. Clearing House, 72, 231–235.
20. Dickson, S., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1998). Text organization: Research bases. In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kameenui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs(pp. 239–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224.
22. Duke, N. K., Bennett-Armistead, V. S., & Roberts, E. M. (2002). Incorporating informational text in the primary grades. In C. M. Roller (Ed.), Comprehensive reading instruction across grade levels: A collection of papers from Reading Research 2001 Conference(pp. 40–54). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
23. Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction(3rd ed., pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
24. Dull, L. J., & van Garderen, D. (2005). Bringing the story back into history: Teaching social studies to children with learning disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 49(3), 27–31.
25. Ehren, B. J. (1994). New directions for meeting the academic needs of adolescents with language learning disabilities. In G. P. Wallach & K. Butler (Eds.), Language learning disabilities in school age children: Some principles and applications(pp. 393–417). New York: Macmillan.
26. Engelmann, S., Carnine, D., & Steely, D. G. (1991). Making connections in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 292–303.
27. Englert, C. S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1984). Children’s developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 65–74.
28. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Gregg, S. L., & Anthony, H. M. (1989). Exposition: Reading, writing, and the metacognitive knowledge of learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Research, 5(1), 5–24.
29. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Fear, K. L., & Anderson, L. M. (1988). Students’ metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational reports. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 18–46.
30. Englert, C. S., & Thomas, C. C. (1987). Sensitivity to text structure in reading and learning: A comparison between learning disabled and non-learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 71, 279–320.
31. Espin, C., & Sindelar, P. (1988). Auditory feedback and writing: Learning disabled and non-disabled students. Exceptional Children, 55, 45–51.
32. Fletcher, P. (1992). Sub-groups in school-age language impaired children. In P. Fletcher (Ed.), Specific speech and language disorders in children(pp. 152–182). San Diego, CA: Singular.
33. Francis, W., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency of analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
34. Gajar, A. (1989). A computer analysis of written language variables and a comparison of compositions written by university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 125–130.
35. Gillam, R., & Johnston, J. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning impaired and normally achieving school-age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1303–1315.
36. Gillam, R. B., Pena, E. D., & Miller, L. (1999). Dynamic assessment of narrative and expository discourse. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(1), 33–47.
37. Gordon, C. J., & Braun, C. (1985). Metacognitive processes: Reading and writing narrative discourse. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognitive, cognition, and human performance(Vol. 2, pp. 1–75). New York: Academic Press.
38. Graesser, A., Leon, J. A., & Otero, J. (2002). The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Hadley, P. A. (1998). Language sampling protocols for eliciting text-level discourse. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 132–147.
40. Hall, L. A. (2004). Comprehending expository text: Promising strategies for struggling readers and students with reading disabilities? Reading Research and Instruction, 44(2), 75–95.
41. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
42. Hansen, C. L. (1978). Story retelling used with average and learning disabled readers as a measure of reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 62–69.
43. Houck, C., & Billingsley, B. (1989). Written expression of students with and without learning disabilities: Differences across the grades. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 561–572.
44. Inspiration Software. (1988–1993). Inspiration(Ver. 4.0). Portland, OR: Author.
45. Irwin, J. W., & Baker, I. (1989). Promoting active reading comprehension strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46. Ivey, G. (1999). A multicase study in middle school: Complexities among young adolescent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 172–192.
47. Kaminski, R. A., Lazar, M. K., & Bean, R. M. (1993, December). Students’ ability to apply and reflect on organizational structures used in composing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Charleston, SC.
48. Langer, S. (1985). Children’s sense of genre: A study of performance on parallel reading and writing tasks. Written Communication, 3, 157–187.
49. Langer, S. (1986). Reading, writing, and understanding: An analysis of the construction of meaning. Written Communication, 3, 219–267.
50. Lauer, K. D. (2002). The effect of text structure, content familiarity, and reading ability on second-graders’ comprehension of text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
51. Longacre, R. E. (1983). The grammar of discourse. New York: Plenum.
52. Mason, L. H., Meadan, H., Hedin, L., & Corso, L. (2006). Self-regulated strategy development instruction for expository text comprehension. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(4), 47–52.
53. Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72–103.
54. Meyer, B. J. F., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 121–143.
55. Meyer, B. J. F., Theodorou, E., Brezenski, K. L., Middlemiss, W., McDougall, J., & Bartlett, B. J. (2002). Effects of structure strategy instruction delivered to fifth grade children using the Internet with and without the aid of older adult tutors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 486–519.
56. Moran, M. (1981). Performance of learning disabled and low achieving secondary students on formal features of a paragraph-writing task. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 271–280.
57. Morris, N., & Crump, W. D. (1982). Syntactic and vocabulary development in the written language of learning disabled and non-learning disabled students at four age levels. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 163–172.
58. Moss, B. (1997). A qualitative assessment of first graders’ retelling of expository text. Reading Research and Instruction, 37, 1–13.
59. Myklebust, H. R. (1973). Development and disorders of written language: Vol. 2. Studies of normal and exceptional children. New York: Grune & Stratton.
60. National Center for Education Statistics. (2001, April). The Nation’s Report Card: Fourth-Grade Reading 2000. Retrieved August 20, 2009 from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2000/2001499.asp
61. Neville, M. (1988). Assessing and teaching language: Literacy and oracy in schools. London: Macmillan Education.
62. Newcomer, P., & Barenbaum, E. (1991). The written composing ability of children with learning disabilities: A review of the literature from 1980 to 1990. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 578–593.
63. Newkirk, T. (1987). The non-narrative writing of young children. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 121–144.
64. Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties(pp. 69–92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65. Pappas, C. C. (1993). Is narrative “primary”? Some insights from kindergarteners’ pretend readings of stories and informational books. Journal of Reading Behavior,25, 97–129.
66. Poplin, M. S., Gray, R., Larsen, S., Banikoski, A., & Mehring, T. (1980). A comparison of components of written expression abilities in learning disabled and nonlearning disabled students at three grade levels. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 46–53.
67. Raphael, T. S., Englert, C. S., & Kirschner, B. W. (1986). The impact of text structure instruction and social context on students’ comprehension and production of expository text(Research Series No. 177). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.
68. Raphael, T. E., & Kirschner, B. M. (1985). The effects of instruction in comparison/contrast text structure on sixth-grade students’ reading comprehension and writing products(Research Series No. 161). East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching.
69. Richgels, D. J., McGee, L. M., Lomax, R. G., & Sheard, C. (1987). Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 177–196.
70. Rubin, H., Patterson, P., & Kantor, M. (1991). Morphological development and writing ability in children and adults. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 228–235.
71. Saenz, L. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 31–41.
72. Scarborough, H. S., & Dobrich, W. (1990). Development of children with early language delay. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 70–83.
73. Scott, C. (1988). Learning to write: Context, form, and process. In M. Nippold (Ed.), Later language development: Ages nine through nineteen(pp. 49–95). San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
74. Scott, C. (1994). A discourse continuum for school-age students: Impact of modality and genre. In G. Wallach & K. Butler (Eds.), Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents: Some underlying principles and applications(pp. 219–252). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Macmillan.
75. Scott, C. M. (1995). Syntax for school-age children: A discourse perspective. In M. F. Fey & J. Windsor (Eds.), Language intervention: Preschool through the elementary years(pp. 107–143). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
76. Scott, C., & Klutsenbaker, K. (1989, November). Comparing spoken and written summaries: Text structure and surface form. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, St. Louis, MO.
77. Scott, C. M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 324–339.
78. Skarakis-Doyle, E., & Mentis, M. (1991). A discourse approach to language disorders: Investigating complex sentence production. In T. M. Gallagher (Ed.), Pragmatics of language: Clinical practice issues(pp. 283–305). San Diego, CA: Singular.
79. Stein, N. L., & Trabasso, T. (1981). What’s in a story: An approach to comprehension and instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology(Vol. 2, pp. 213–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
80. Sturm, J. M., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computergenerated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,17(2), 124–139.
81. Taylor, B. M. (1980). Children’s memory for expository text after reading. Reading Research Quarterly,15(3), 399–411.
82. Taylor, B. M., & Samuels, S. J. (1983). Children’s use of text structure in the recall of expository materials. American Educational Research Journal, 20(4), 517–528.
83. Thomas, C. C., Englert, C. S., & Gregg, S. (1987). An analysis of errors and strategies in the expository writing of learning disabled students. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 21–30.
84. Torgesen, J. (1980). Conceptual and educational implications of the use of efficient task strategies by learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 364–371.
85. Tyack, D. (1981). Teaching complex sentences. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,12, 49–56.
86. Vogel, S. (1985). Syntactic complexity in written expression of LD college writers. Annals of Dyslexia, 35, 137–157.
87. Vogel, S. A., & Moran, M. (1982). Written language disorders in learning disabled college students: A preliminary report. In W. Cruickshank & J. Lerner (Eds.), Coming of age: The best of ACLD(Vol. 3, pp. 137–157). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
88. Ward-Lonergan, J. M. (2001, April). Curriculum-based language intervention for older children and adolescents. Paper presented at the annual convention of the California Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Monterey, CA.
89. Ward-Lonergan, J. M., Liles, B. Z., & Anderson, A. M. (1998). Listening comprehension and recall abilities in adolescents with language-learning disabilities and without disabilities for social studies lectures. Journal of Communication Disorders, 1, 1–32.
90. Ward-Lonergan, J. M., Liles, B. Z., & Anderson, A. M. (1999). Verbal retelling abilities in adolescents with and without language-learning disabilities for social studies lectures. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(3), 213–223.
91. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
92. Westby, C. (1991). Steps to developing and achieving language-based curriculum in the classroom. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
93. Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., & Lauer, K. D. (2004). Teaching expository text structure to young at-risk learners: Building the basics of comprehension instruction. Exceptionality, 12(3), 129–144.
94. Williams, J. P., Taylor, M. B., & deCani, J. S. (1984). Constructing macrostructure for expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1065–1075.
95. Windsor, J., Scott, C. M., & Street, C. K. (2000). Verb and noun morphology in the spoken and written language of children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1322–1336.
96. Wong, B. Y. L. (1980). Activating the inactive learner: Use of questions/prompts to enhance comprehension and retention of implied information in learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 29–37.
97. Wong, B. Y. L. (2000). Writing strategies instruction for expository essays for adolescents with and without learning disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(4), 29–44.
98. Wong, B., Wong, R., & Blenkinsop, J. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning disabled adolescents’ composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 300–322.
99. Wynn-Dancy, M. L. (2001). Working memory in adolescents with language-learning disabilities: The effects of prior knowledge and presentation rate on the recognition and recall of expository text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
100. Zipprich, M. A. (1995). Teaching web making as a guided planning tool to improve student narrative writing. Remedial and Special Education, 16(1), 3–15.