Evaluation of HL-20 roller pump and rotaflow centrifugal pump on perfusion quality and gaseous microemboli delivery

Artificial Organs

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 937-943

  Yee, Stella ^a   Qiu, Feng ^a   Su, Xiaowei ^a   Rider, Alan ^a   Kunselman, Allen R ^a   Guan, Yulong ^a   Ündar, Akif ^a,b  

^a PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary bypass; Centrifugal pump; Gaseous microemboli; Pediatric; Roller pump; Total hemodynamic energy

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS; FLOW RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; QUALITY CONTROL; ROLLERS (MACHINE COMPONENTS);

ARTERIAL FILTERS; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS CIRCUIT; ENERGY PRODUCTIONS; GASEOUS MICROEMBOLUS; HEMODYNAMIC ENERGY; MICROEMBOLI; ROLLER PUMPS; SIMULATED MODEL; TOTAL HEMODYNAMIC ENERGY;

PEDIATRICS;

ARTICLE; BLOOD PUMP; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CENTRIFUGE; FLOW RATE; GASEOUS MICROEMBOLISM; HEART LUNG MACHINE; HEMATOCRIT; MICROEMBOLISM; OXYGENATOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; SIMULATION;

EID: 78649441283     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01079.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ündar A, Eichstaedt HC, Masai T, et-al. Comparison of six pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass pumps during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:827-9.
2. Haines NM, Wang S, Myers JL, Ündar A. Comparison of pumps and oxygenators with pulsatile and non-pulsatile modes in an infant cardiopulmonary bypass model. Artif Organs 2009;33:993-1001.
3. Su XW, Ündar A. Brain protection during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. Artif Organs 2010;34:E91-E102.
4. Stump DA. Embolic factors associated with cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005;9:151-2.
5. Motallebzadeh R, Bland JM, Markus HS, Kaski JC, Marjan Jahangiri M. Neurocognitive function and cerebral emboli: randomized study of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;8:475-82.
6. Borger MA, Peniston CM, Weisel RD. Neuropsychologic impairment after coronary bypass surgery: effect of gaseous microemboli during perfusionist interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:743-9.
7. Schreiner RS, Rider AR, Myers JW, et-al. Microemboli detection and classification by innovative ultrasound technology during simulated neonatal CPB at different flow rates, perfusion modes, and perfusate temperatures. ASAIO J 2008;54:316-24.
8. Lynch JE, Riley JB. Microemboli detection on extracorporeal bypass circuits. Perfusion 2008;23:23-32.
9. Shepard RB, Simpson DC, Sharp JF. Energy equivalent pressure. Arch Surg 1966;93:730-40.
10. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
11. Lynch JE, Pouch A, Sanders R, Hinders M, Rudd K, Sevick J. Gaseous microemboli sizing in extracorporeal circuits using ultrasound backscatter. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007;33:1661-75.
12. Wang S, Woitas K, Clark JB, Myers JL, Ündar A. Clinical real-time monitoring of gaseous microemboli in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. Artif Organs 2009;33:1026-30.
13. Tayama E, Arinaga K, Kawano H. Microbubble generation in roller and Centrifugal pumps. J Artif Organs 1999;2:58-61.