Microemboli detection on extracorporeal bypass circuits

Perfusion

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 23-32

  Lynch, John E ^a   Riley, J B ^b  

^a LUNA INNOVATIONS INC   (United States)

^b ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebral outcomes; Embolic load; Extracorporeal circulation; Gaseous microemboli

Indexed keywords

BRAIN EMBOLISM; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; GAS EMBOLISM; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; MICROEMBOLISM; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; NEUROIMAGING; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SIGNAL DETECTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STROKE; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; EMBOLISM, AIR; HUMANS; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION;

EID: 50649090694     PISSN: 02676591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0267659108094350     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Kursz, M, Butler, BD. Bubbles and bypass: an update. Perfusion 2004; 19: S49-S55.
2. Courtney, PH, Han, YQ, Warren, ET, Heath, BJ. Gross air handling characteristics of membrane oxygenators: an in vitro study. J Extra-Corpor Technol 1994; 26: 6-12.
3. Norman, MJ, Sistino, SS, Acsell, JR. The effectiveness of low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous emboli. J Extra-Corpor Technol 2004; 36: 336-342.
4. Jones, TJ, Deal, DD, Vernon, JC, Blackburn, N, Stump, DA. Does vacuum-assisted venous drainage increase gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 2132-2137.
5. Dickinson, TA, Riley, JB, Crowley, JC, Zabetakis, PM. In vitro evaluation of the air separation ability of four cardiovascular manufacturer extracorporeal circuit designs. J Extra-Corpor Technol 2006; 38: 206-213.
6. Mueller, XM, Tevaerai, HT, Jegger, D, Augstburger, M, Burki, M, von Segesser, LK. Ex vivo testing of the Quart® arterial line filter. Perfusion 1999; 14: 481-487.
7. Taylor, KM. Brain damage during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65: S20-S26.
8. Wilcox, TW, Mitchell, SJ, Gorman, DF. Venous air in the bypass circuit: a source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum-assisted drainage. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 1285-1289.
9. Massimino, RJ, Gough, JD, Stearns, GT, Martin, J. Gaseous emboli removal efficiency in arterial screen filters: a comparative study. J Extra-Corpor Technol 1983; 15: 25-34.
10. Bourger, MA, Peniston, CM, Weisel, RD, Vasiliou, M, Green, REA, Feindel, CM. Neuropsychologic impairment after coronary bypass surgery: effect of gaseous microemboli during perfusionist interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121: 743-749.
11. Mitchell, S, Gorman, D. The pathophysiology of cerebral arterial gas embolism. J Extra-Corpor Technol 2002; 34: 18-23.
12. Barak, M, Katz, Y. Microbubbles: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Chest 2005; 128: 2918-2932.
13. Lund, C, Hol, PK, Lundblad, R, et al. Comparison of cerebral embolization during off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 765-770.
14. Malheiros, SMF, Massaro, AR, Gabbai, AA, et al. Is the number of microembolic signals related to neurologic outcome in coronary bypass surgery. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2001; 59: 1-5.
15. Van Dijk, D, Jansen, EWL, Hijman, R, et al. Cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump CABG surgery. JAMA 2002; 287: 1405-1412.
16. Motallebzadeh, R, Bland, JM, Markus, HS, Kaski, JC, Jahangiri, M. Neurocognitive function and cerebral emboli: randomized study of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: 475-482.
17. Neville, MJ, Butterworth, J, James, RL, Hammon, JW, Stump, DA. Similar neurobehavioral outcome after valve or coronary artery operations despite differing carotid embolic counts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121: 125-136.
18. Pugsley, W, Klinger, L, Paschalis, C, Treasure, T, Harrison, M, Newman, S. The impact of microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass on neuropsychological functioning. Stroke 1994; 25: 1393-1399.
19. Barbut, D, Lo, YW, Gold, JP, et al. Impact of embolization during coronary artery bypass grafting on outcome and length of stay. Ann Thorac Surgery 1997; 63: 998-1002.
20. Clark, RE, Brillman, J, Davis, DA, Lovell, MR, Price, TRP, Macgovern, GL. Microemboli during coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 249-258.
21. Raymond, PD, Marsh, NA. Alteration to haemostasis following cardiopulmonary bypass and the relationship of these changes to neurocognitive morbidity. Blood Coag & Fib 2001; 12: 601-618.
22. Brown, WR, Moody, BM, Challa, VA, Stump, DA, Hammon, JW. Longer duration of cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with greater numbers of cerebral microemboli. Stroke 2000; 31: 707-713.
23. Russell, D, Bornstein, N. Methods of detecting potential causes of vascular cognitive impairment after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Neuro Sciences 2005; 229-230: 69-73.
24. Toner, I, Peden, CJ, Hamid, SK, Newman, S, Taylor, KM, Smith, PL. MRI and neuropsychological changes after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1994; 6: 163-169.
25. Vanninen, R, Aikia, M, Kononen, M, Partanen, K, Tulla, H, Hartikainen, P. Subclinical cerebral complications after coronary artery bypass grafting. Prospective analysis with magnetic resonance imaging, quantitative electroencephalography and neuropsychological assessment. Arch Neurol 1998; 55: 618-627.
26. Bendszus, M, Reents, W, Franke, D, et al. Brain damage after coronary artery bypass grafting. Arch Neurol] 2002; 59: 1090-1095.
27. Restrepo, L, Wityk, RJ, Grega, MA, et al. Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain before and after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Stroke 2002; 33: 2909-2915.
28. Knipp, SC, Matatko, N, Wilhem, H, Schlamann, B, Massoudy, P, Forsting, M. Evaluation of brain injury after coronary artery bypass grafting. A prospective study using neuropsychological assessment and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25: 791-800.
29. Roach, GW, Kanchuger, M, Mangano, CM, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1857-1863.
30. Riley, JB. Arterial line filters ranked for gaseous microemboli separation performance: an in-vitro study. J Extra-Corpor Technol 2008; 40: 21-26.
31. Jones, TJ, Deal, DD, Vernon, JC, Blackburn, N, Stump, DA. How effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous microemboli. J Extra-Corpor Technol 2002; 34: 34-39.
32. LaPietra, A, Grossi, EA, Pua, BB, et al. Assisted venous drainage presents the risk of undetected air microembolism. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 120: 856-863.
33. Moehle, DA. Neuromonitoring in the cardiopulmonary bypass surgical patient: clinical applications. J Extra-Corpor Technol 2001; 33: 126-134.
34. Merkle, F, Bottcher, W, Hetzer, R. Prebypass filtration of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: an outdated technique. Perfusion 2003; 18: 81-88.
35. Borger, MA, Feindel, CM. Cerebral emboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: effect of perfusionist interventions and aortic cannulas.J Extra-Corpor Technol 2002; 34: 29-33.
36. Fearn, SJ, Pole, R, Burgess, M, Ray, SG, Hooper, TL, McCollum, CN. Cerebral embolisation during modern cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 20: 1163-1167.
37. Wolf, LG, Abu-Omar, Y, Choudhary, BP, Pigott, D, Taggart, DP. Gaseous and solid cerebral microembolization during proximal aortic anastomoses in off-pump coronary surgery: the effect of an aortic side-biting clamp and two clampless devices. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: 485-493.
38. Rodriquez, RA, Rubens, F, Belway, D, Nathan, HJ. Residual air in the venous cannula increases cerebral embolization at the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29: 175-180.
39. Wilcox, TW, Mitchell, SJ, Gorman, DF. Venous air in the bypass circuit: a source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum-assisted drainage. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 1285-1289.
40. Rider, S, Simon, LV, Rice, BJ, Poulton, CC. Assisted venous drainage, venous air and gaseous microemboli transmission into the arterial line: an in-vitro study. J Extra-Corpor Technol 1998; 30: 160-165.
41. Wilcox, TW. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage: to air or not to air, that is the question. Has the bubble burst. J Extra-Corpor Technol 2002; 34: 24-28.
42. Rodriquez, RA, Williams, KA, Babaev, A, Rubens, F, Nathan, HJ. Effect of perfusionist technique on cerebral embolization during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 2005; 30: 3-10.
43. Ruldolph, JL, Tilahun, D, Treanor, PR, et al. Use of a large bore syringe creates significantly fewer high intensity transient signals (HITS) into a cardiopulmonary bypass system than a small bore syringe. Perfusion 2006; 21: 67-71.
44. Mitchell, SJ, Wilcox, T, McDougal, C, Gorman, DF. Emboli generation by the Medtronic Maxima hard-shell adult venous reservoir in cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: a preliminary report. Perfusion 1996; 11: 145-155.
45. Mitchell, SJ, Wilcox, T, Gorman, DF. Bubble generation and venous air filtration by hard-shell venous reservoirs: a comparative study. Perfusion 1997; 12: 325-333.
46. Butler, BD, Robinson, R, Fife, C, Sutton, T. Doppler detection of decompression bubbles with computer assisted digitization of ultrasonic signals. Aviat Space Environ Med 1991; 62: 997-1004.
47. Van Zuilen, EV, Mess, WH, Jansen, C, Van der Tweel, I, Van Gijn, J, Ackerstaff, GA. Automatic embolus detection compared with human experts. A Doppler ultrasound study. Stroke 1996; 27: 1840-1843.
48. Padayachee, TS, Parsons, S, Theobold, R, Linley, J, Gosling, RG, Deverall, PB. The detection of microemboli in the middle cerebral artery during cardiopulmonary bypass: a transcranial Doppler ultrasound investigation using membrane and bubble oxygenators. Ann Thorac Surg 1987; 44: 298-302.
49. Tufan, K, Ademoglu, A, Kurtaran, E, Yildiz, G, Aydin, S, Egi, SM. Automatic detection of bubbles in the subclavian vein using Doppler ultrasound signals. Aviat Space Environ Med 2006; 77: 957-962.
50. Droste, DW, Ringelstein, EB. Detection of high intensity transient signals (HITS): how and why. Eur J Ultrasound 1998; 7: 23-29.
51. Eitschberger, S, Henseler, A, Krasenbrink, B, Oedekoven, B, Mottaghy, K. Investigation on the ability of an ultrasound bubble detector to deliver size measurements of gaseous bubbles in fluid lines by using a glass bead model. ASAIO Journal 2001; 47: 18-24.
52. Reid, DB. An algorithm for tracking multiple targets. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1979; 24: 843-852.
53. Lynch, JE, Pouch, A, Sanders, R, Hinders, M, Rudd, K, Sevick, J. Gaseous microemboli sizing in extracorporeal circuits using ultrasound backscatter. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 2007; 33: 1661-1675.
54. Xu, D, Wang, Y. An automated feature extraction and emboli detection system based on the PCA and fuzzy sets. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2007; 37: 861-871.
55. Devuyst, G, Darbellay, GA, Vesin, JM, et al. Automatic classification of HITS into artifacts or solid or gaseous emboli by a wavelet representation combined with dual-gate TCD. Stroke 2001; 32: 2803-2809.
56. Smith, JL, Evans, DH, Bell, P, Naylor, AR. Time domain analysis of embolic signals can be used in place of high-resolution Wigner Analysis when classifying gaseous and particulate emboli. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol 1998; 24: 989-993.
57. Markus, HS, Punter, M. Can transcranial Doppler discriminate between solid and gaseous microemboli? Assessment of a dual-frequency transducer system. Stroke 2005; 36: 1731-1734.