Qualitative research in question: A narrative of disciplinary power with/ in the IRB

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 212-232

  Johnson, Star Tara ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Disciplinary power; IRB; NRC report; Research ethics

Indexed keywords

EID: 39149109964     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800407308821     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barreca, R., & Morse, D. D. (Eds.). (1997). The erotics of instruction. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
2. Caputo, J.D. (1993). Against ethics: Contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3. Cunningham, J.W. (2002). The National Reading Panel report (a review). In R. L. Allington (Ed.), Big brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidence (pp. 49-74). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4. Derrida, J. (2001, September). A dialogue with Jacques Derrida on Augustine and "circumfession." Presentation at the Religion and Postmodernism Conference 3: Confessions, Philadelphia.
5. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality. Volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1976)
6. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1975)
7. Gallas, K. (1998). "Sometimes I can be anything": Power, gender, and identity in a primary classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Gallop, J. (1997). Feminist accused of sexual harassment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9. Hendrie, C. (1998). Sex with students: When employees cross the line. Education Week. Retrieved August 2, 2004 from from http://www.edweek.org/ we/vol-18/14abuse.h18
10. hooks, b. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York: Routledge.
11. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). What Works Clearinghouse. Retrieved September 20, 2006, from http://www.whatworks.ed.gov
12. Kirsch, G.E. (1999). Ethical dilemmas in feminist research: The politics of location, interpretation, and publication. Albany: State University of New York Press.
13. Lincoln, Y.S. (2004, April). Academic freedom, IRBs and the NRC committee report. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Diego, CA.
14. Lincoln, Y.S., & Tierney, W.G. (2004). IRBs and qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 219-234.
15. Marcus, G.E. (1994). What comes (just) after "post"? The case of ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 563-574). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. McWilliam, E. (1999). Pedagogical pleasures. New York: Peter Lang.
17. National Institutes of Health. (2004). Certificates of confidentiality: Background information. Retrieved September 20, 2004, from http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/policy/coc/background.htm
18. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education (R. J. Shavelson & L. Towne, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. Nelson, C. (2004). The brave new world of research surveillance. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 207-218.
20. Rajchman, J. (1991). Philosophical events: Essays of the 80's. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 923-948). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Shakeshaft, C. (2004). Educator sexual misconduct: A synthesis of existing literature (ED-02-PO-3281). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
23. Spivak, G.C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. New York: Routledge.
24. St. Pierre, E.A. (2002). "Science" rejects postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 25-27.
25. Wolf, M. (1992). A thrice-told tale: Feminism, postmodernism, and ethnographic responsibility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.