Rethinking ethics review as institutional discourse

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 336-352

  Halse, Christine ^a   Honey, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Anorexia; Discourse; Ethics; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147171432     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800406297651     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 515-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Benhabib, S. (1987). The generalized other and the concrete other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan controversy and feminist theory. In S. Benhabib & D. Cornell (Eds.), Feminism as critique: On the politics of gender (pp. 77-95). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3. Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
4. Butler, J., Laclau, E., & Zizek, S. (2004). Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. In S. Salih & J. Butler, The Judith Butler reader (pp. 258-277). Maldan, MA: Blackwell.
5. Cannella, G. (2004). Regulatory power: Can a feminist poststructuralist engage in research oversight? Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 235-245.
6. Castel, R. (1999). From dangerousness to risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 281 - 298). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Cave, E., & Holm, S. (2003). Milgram and Tuskegee: Paradigm research projects in bioethics. Health Care Analysis, 11(1), 27-40.
8. Chiapello, E., & Fairclough, N. (2002). Understanding the new management ideology. A trans-disciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and new sociology of capitalism. Discourse and Society, 13(2), 185-208.
9. Denzin, N. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Erickson, F. (1996). On the evolution of qualitative approaches in educational research: From Adam's task to Eve's. Australian Educational Researcher, 23(2), 1-15.
12. Feder, K.E. (1999). Love's labor. Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.
13. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and "ethically important moments" in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261-280.
14. Halse, C. (2004). Disquiet on the research front: Surveying the battle ground between researchers and human research ethics committees. Proceedings of the Australian Association for Professional and Applied Ethics Conference, Sydney. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for International Corporate Governance Research, Victoria University.
15. Halse, C. (2006). Writing/reading a life: The rhetorical practice of autobiography. Auto/Biography, 14(2), 95-115.
16. Halse, C., & Honey, A. (2005). Unravelling ethics: Illuminating the moral dilemmas of research ethics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(4), 2142-2161.
17. Humphreys, L. (1975). Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.
18. Johnson, J.M. (2002). In-depth interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 103-120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Keenan, T. (1997). Fables of responsibility: Aberrations and predicaments in ethics and politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20. Lather, P. (1991). Feminist research in education: Within/against. Geelong, Victoria, Canada: Deakin University Press.
21. Lincoln, Y.S. (2004). Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 219-234.
22. Loue, S. (2000). Textbook of research ethics: Theory and practice. New York: Plenum.
23. McNeill, P. (1993). The ethics and politics of human experimentation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Medical Research Council of Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, & Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (1998). Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
25. National Health and Medical Research Council. (1999). National statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans. Canberra, Australia: AusInfo.
26. The Nuremberg Code. (1949). In A. Mitscherlich & F. Mielke (Eds.), Doctors of infamy: The story of the Nazi medical crimes (pp. xxiii-xxv). New York: Schuman.
27. Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul of the private self (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.
28. Strathern, M. (1997). " Improving ratings": Audit in the British university system. European Review, 5(3), 305-321.
29. Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge.
30. Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries. A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
31. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2005, June 23). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Retrieved September 1, 2005, from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm
32. Van den Hoonaard, W.C. (2001). Is research-ethics review a moral panic? The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 38(1), 19-36.
33. Walker, M. (1997). Moral understanding: A feminist study in ethics. New York: Routledge.
34. World Medical Association. (1964). Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Retrieved September 1, 2005, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/helsinki.html
35. Wright, D. (2004). Creative nonfiction and the academy: A cautionary tale. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 202-206.