Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after hip resurfacing and uncemented total hip replacement: A prospective randomised controlled study

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 92 B, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1509-1514

  Smolders, J M H ^a   Hol, A ^a   Rijnders, T ^a   Van Susante, J L C ^a  

^a RIJNSTATE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; GENDER; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR NECK; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649404536     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B11.24785     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Oh I, Harris WH. Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur: an in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip-replacement femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1978;60-A:75-85. (Pubitemid 8298335)
2. Kröger H, Venesmaa P, Jurvelin J, et al. Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998;352:66-74.
3. Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, et al. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:185-9.
4. Harty JA, Devitt B, Harty LC, Molloy M, McGuinness A. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis of peri-prosthetic stress shielding in the Birmingham resurfacing hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125:693-5. (Pubitemid 41782437)
5. Deuel CR, Jamali AA, Stover SM, Hazelwood SJ. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:124-30.
6. de Waal Malefijt MC, Huiskes R. A clinical, radiological and biomechanical study of the TARA hip prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1993;112:220-5.
7. Watanabe Y, Shiba N, Matsuo S, et al. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:505-11.
8. Spencer S, Carter R, Murray H, Meek RM. Femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:1105-9.
9. Shimmin A, Beaulé PE, Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:637-54.
10. Kiratli BJ, Heiner JP, McBeath AA, Wilson MA. Determination of bone mineral density by dual X-ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 1992;10:836-44.
11. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979;141:17-27.
12. Hayaishi Y, Miki H, Nishii T, et al. Proximal femoral bone mineral density after resurfacing total hip arthroplasty and after standard stem-type cementless total hip arthroplasty, both having similar neck preservation and the same articulation type. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:1208-13. (Pubitemid 350216977)
13. Lian YY, Pei FX, Yoo MC, Cheng JQ, Fatou CY. Changes of the bone mineral density in proximal femur following total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of femoral head. J Orthop Res 2007;26:453-9.
14. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88-A(Suppl 1 Pt 2):234-49.
15. Mortimer ES, Rosenthall L, Paterson I, Bobyn JD. Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom. Clin Orthop 1996;324:269-74.
16. Aldinger PR, Sabo D, Pritsch M, et al. Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodelling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 2003;73:115-21. (Pubitemid 37082357)
17. Albanese CV, Santori FS, Pavan L, Learmonth ID, Passariello R. Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs. ultra-short custom-made femoral stems: 37 patients followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop 2009;80:291-7.
18. Hing CB, Young DA, Dalziel RE, et al. Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1019-24.
19. McCarthy CK, Steinberg GG, Agren M, et al. Quantifying bone loss from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1991;73-B:774-8.
20. Venesmoa PK, Kröger HP, Jurvelin JS, et al. Periprosthetic bone loss after cemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective 5-year dual energy radiographic absorptiometry study of 15 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2003;74:31-6.
21. Sköldenberg OG, Bodén HS, Salemyr MO, Ahl TE, Adolphson PY. Periprosthetic proximal bone loss after uncemented hip arthroplasty is related to stem size: DXA measurements in 138 patients followed for 2-7 years. Acta Orthop 2006;77:386-92.
22. Kim YH, Yoon SH, Kim JS. Changes in the bone mineral density in the acetabulum and proximal femur after cementless total hip replacement: alumina-on-alumina versus alumina-on-polyethylene articulation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:174-9.