Capacities, innovation and feedbacks in production networks in Argentina

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 719-741

  Erbes, Analía ^a   Robert, Verónica ^a   Yoguel, Gabriel ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Absorption and connectivity capacities; Complexity; Feedbacks; Production networks; Structural change

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649348266     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438590903040807     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45, no. 3: 425-55.
2. Albornoz, F., D. Milesi, and G. Yoguel. 2005. Knowledge circulation in vertically integrated production networks: The cases of the Argentine automotive and iron and steel industries. In Innovation, growth and development in Latin-America: Stylized facts and a policy agenda, ed. G. Dutrenit and J. Katz, vol. 7, number 2-3, 220-1. Australia: eContent Management.
3. Albornoz, F., and G. Yoguel. 2004. Competitiveness and production network: The case of the Argentine automotive sector. Industrial and Corporate Change 13, no. 4: 619-42.
4. Alm, H., and M. McKelvey. 2000. When and why does cooperation positively or negatively affect innovation? An exploration into turbulent waters. CRIC Discussion Paper 39. http://cosmic.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/webcat/hwwa/edok01/cric/dp39.pdf
5. Angrist, J., G. Imbens, and D. Rubin. 1996. Identification of causal effect susing instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91, no. 434: 444-55.
6. Antonelli, C. 1980. Localised technological change: Towards the economics of complexity. London: Routledge.
7. Antonelli, C. 1997. Percolation processes, technological externalities and the evolution of technological clubs. Empirica 24, no. 1-2: 137-56.
8. Antonelli, C. 1999. The evolution of industrial organization of the production of knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23: 243-60.
9. Antonelli, C. 2007. Technological knowledge as an essential facility. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17, no. 4: 451-71.
10. Armour, H., and D. Teece. 1980. Vertical integration and technological innovation. The Review of Economics and Statistics 62, no. 3: 470-4.
11. Arthur, B. 1999. Complexity and the economy. Sciences 284, no. 5411: 107-9.
12. Arthur, B., S. Durlauf, and D. Lane. 1997. The economy as an evolving complex system II. Proceedings volume XXVII. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley.
13. Arza, V., and A. López. 2009. Firms' linkages with universities and public research institutes in Argentina: Drivers and effects of interacting from a firms' perspective. WP no. 3812009, Centro de Investigaciones para la Transformación.
14. Benavente, J., and D. Contreras. 2008. Cooperation partners in manufacture sector, evidence from the fourth Chilean innovation survey. Paper presented to the 12th Conference of the International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society, 2-5 July, in Río de Janeiro.
15. Bianchi, C., N. Gras, and J. Sutz. 2008. Make, buy and cooperate in innovation: Evidence from Uruguayan manufacturing surveys and other innovation studies. Paper presented to the 12th Conference of the International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society, 2-5 July, in Río de Janeiro.
16. Bisang, R., M. Novick, S. Sztulwark, and G. Yoguel. 2005. Las redes de producción y el empleo. In Redes, jerarquías y dinámicas productivas, ed. M. Casalet, M. Cimoli, and G. Yoguel, 153-202. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila, OIT-Flacso México.
17. Caloghirou, Y., I. Kastelli, and A. Tsakanikas. 2004. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation 24, no. 1: 29-39.
18. Casalet, M. 2005. Los cambios en el diseño institucional y la construcción de redes de modernización tecnológica. In Redes, jerarquías y dinámicas productivas, ed. M. Casalet, M. Cimoli and G. Yoguel, 71-91. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila, OIT-Flacso México.
19. Cimoli, M., G. Porcile, A. Primi, and S. Vergara. 2005. Cambio Estructural, Heterogeneidad Productiva y Tecnología en América Latina. In Heterogeneidad estructural, asimetrías tecnológicas y crecimiento en America Latina, ed. M. Cimoli, 9-37. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL-BID.
20. Cimoli, M., G. Porcile, and S. Rovira. 2010. Structural change and the BOP-constraint: Why did Latin America fail to converge? Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 389-411.
21. Cimoli, M., A. Primi, and S. Rovira. 2008. Sectoral patterns of learning, technological specificities and innovative behavior in Latin America: A reflection on what can we learn and what we cannot from national innovation surveys. Paper presented to the 12th Conference of the International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society, 2-5 July, in Río de Janeiro.
22. Cohen, W., and D. Levinthal. 1989. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 99, no. 397: 569-96.
23. Cohen, W., and D. Levinthal. 1990. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 35: 128-52.
24. Coombs, R., and S.J. Metcalfe. 2000. Universities, the science base and the innovation performance of the UK. CRIC Briefing Paper 5. http://www.cric.ac.uk/cric/Pdfs/bp5.
25. pdfCoriat, B., and O. Weinstein. 2002. Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation. Research Policy 31, no. 2: 273-90.
26. Crespi, G. 2008. National innovation surveys in Latin America: A critical assessment. Paper presented to the 12th Conference of the International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society, 2-5 July, in Río de Janeiro.
27. Cullen, P.-A. 2000. Contracting, co-operative relations and extended enterprises. Technovation 20: 363-72.
28. David, P. 1985. Clio and the economics of qwerty. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 75, no. 2: 332-7.
29. Dosi, G. 1991. Some thoughts on the promises, challenges and dangers of an 'evolutionary perspective'. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1, no. 1: 5-7.
30. Dosi, G., and Y. Kaniovski. 1994. On 'badly behaved' dynamics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 4: 93-123.
31. Dosi, G., and R. Nelson. 1994. An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 4, no. 3: 153-72.
32. Durlauf, S. 1997. What should policymakers know about economic complexity? Santa Fe Institute Working Papers Num. 97-10-080. http://www.santafe.edu/research/publications/workingpapers/97-10-080.pdf
33. Erbes, A., V. Robert, G. Yoguel, J. Borello, and V. Lebedinsky. 2006. Regímenes tecnológico, de conocimiento y competencia en diferentes formas organizacionales: la dinámica entre difusión y apropiación. Desarrollo Económico. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 46, no. 181: 33-62.
34. Erbes, A., E. Tacsir, and G. Yoguel. 2008. Endogenous competences and linkages development. Paper presented to the 6th International Globelics Conference: New insights for understanding innovation and competence building for sustainable development and social justice, 22-24 September, in México D.F.
35. Erbes, A., and G. Yoguel. 2007. Technological competition and the development of networks in the argentine automobile case in the post-devaluation period. Paper presented to the 5th International Globelics Conference: The global network for economics of learning, innovation, and competence building systems, October, in Saratov-Russia.
36. Fagerberg, J. 2003. Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: An appraisal of the literature. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13, no. 2: 125-59.
37. Formento, H., N. Braidot, and J. Pittaluga. 2007. El proceso de mejora continua en PyMEs Argentinas: investigaciones y modelos posibles. Colección Publicación Electrónica Num. 06, UNGS-IDEI. http://www.ungs.edu.ar/publicaciones/pdf/pe06.
38. pdfFoster, J. 1993. Economics and the self-organization approach: Alfred Marshall revisited? The Economic Journal 103: 975-91.
39. Foster, J. 2005. From simplistic to complex systems in economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 29: 873-92.
40. Garrido Noguera, C., and R. Padilla-Pérez. 2008. Cooperation and innovation in the Mexican manufacturing industry. Paper presented to the 12th Conference of the International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society, 2-5 July, in Río de Janeiro.
41. Giuliani, E., and M. Bell. 2005. The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy 24, no. 1: 47-68.
42. Grandori, A., and G. Soda. 1995. Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies 16, no. 2: 183-214.
43. Holland, J. 2004. El orden oculto: de cómo la adaptación crea la complejidad. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
44. Kupfer, D., and A.P. Avellar. 2008. Appropriability gap and lack of cooperation: Evidences from the Brazilian Innovation Survey. Paper presented to the 12th Conference of the International JosephA. Schumpeter Society, 2-5 July, in Río de Janeiro.
45. Lane, D., and R. Maxfield. 1997. Foresight complexity and strategy. In The economy as an evolving complex system II, ed. B. Arthur, S. Durlauf, and D. Lane, 169-205. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley.
46. Langlois, R. 2003. The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Industrial and Corporate Change 12, no. 2: 351-85.
47. Laursen, K., and A. Salter. 2004. Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy 33: 1201-15.
48. Lewin, R. 1992. Complejidad. El caos como generador del orden. Barcelona: Tusquets.
49. Lugones, G., and D. Suárez. 2006. Los magros resultados de las políticas para el cambio estructural en América Latina: problema instrumental o confusión de objetivos? Documento de trabajo no. 27, Centro Redes.
50. Malerba, F., and L. Orsenigo. 1997. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change 6, no. 1: 83-118.
51. Metcalfe, S., J. Foster, and R. Ramlogan. 2006. Adaptive economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30, no. 1: 7-32.
52. Metcalfe, S., R. Ramlogan, and E. Uyarra. 2003 Economic development and the competitive process. Paper presented to the 1st International Globelics Conference, 2-6 November, in Río de Janeiro.
53. Mowery, D., J. Oxley, and B. Silverman. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer.Strategic Management Journal 17: 77-91.
54. Nelson, R., and S. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Norman, P. 2002. Protecting knowledge in strategic alliances: Resource and relational characteristic. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 13, no. 2: 177-202.
56. Novick, M., and M.A. Gallart. 1997. Competitividad, redes productivas y competencias laborales. Uruguay: OIT.
57. Ocampo, J.A. 2005. Economic growth and the dynamic of prodcutiv structure. In Beyond reforms: Structural dynamics and macroeconomic vulnerability, ed. J.A. Ocampo, 3-44. Washington, DC: The World Bank-ECLAC.
58. Palma, G. 2005. Four sources of deindustrialization and a new concept of the Dutch disease. In Beyond reforms: Structural dynamics and macroeconomic vulnerability, ed. J.A. Ocampo, 71-116. Washington, DC: The World Bank-ECLAC.
59. Powell, W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior 12: 295-336.
60. Reinert, E. 2007. How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor. London: Constable.
61. Richardson, G. 1972. The organization of industry. The Economic Journal 82, no. 327: 883-96.
62. Rivera Ríos, M., V. Robert, and G. Yoguel. 2009. Cambio tecnológico, complejidad e instituciones: el caso de Argentina y México. Problemas del Desarrollo 40, no. 57: 75-109.
63. Roitter, S., A. Erbes, G. Yoguel, M. Delfini, and A. Pujol. 2007. Conocimiento, organización del trabajo y empleo en agentes pertenecientes a las tramas productivas automotriz y siderúrgica. Revista Economía: teoría y práctica 26: 69-118.
64. Ross, J. 2005. Divergence and growth collapses: Theory and empirical evidence. In Beyond reforms: Structural dynamics and macroeconomic vulnerability, ed. J.A. Ocampo, 211-32. Washington, DC: The World Bank-ECLAC.
65. Rosser, J.B. 1999. On the complexities of complex economic dynamics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 13, no. 4: 169-92.
66. Santoro, M., and S. Gopalakrishnan. 2000. The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry-university collaborative ventures. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 17, no. 3-4: 299-319.
67. Schumpeter, J. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (First published in German, 1912.)
68. Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
69. Schumpeter, J. 1947. The creative response in economic history. Journal of Economic History 7, no. 2: 149-59.
70. Silva Failde, D., P. Becerra, and G. Yoguel. Forthcoming. Abriendo la caja negra de diseño. Algunas consideraciones metodológicas aplicadas al sector de indumentaria en Argentina. Revista Redes.
71. Silverberg, G., G. Dosi, and L. Orsenigo. 1988. Innovation, diversity and diffusion: A self-organization model. Economic Journal 98, no. 393: 1032-54.
72. Teece, D. 1992. Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization 18: 1-25.
73. Teece, D., and G. Pisano. 1994. The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change 3, no. 3: 537-56.
74. Tesfatsion, L. 2003. Agent-based computational economics: Modeling economies as complex adaptive systems. Information Sciences 149, no. 4: 263-9.
75. Witt, U. 1997. Self-organization and economics-what is new? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 8, no. 4: 489-507.
76. Yoguel, G. 2007. Tramas productivas y generación de ventajas competitivas: Un abordaje metodológico para pasar de la firma individual a la red. In Estructura productiva y empleo, ed. M. Novick and H. Palomino, 145-80. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila, Ministerio de Trabajo.
77. Yoguel, G., ed., J. Borello, M. Delfini, A. Erbes, V. Robert, and S. Roitter. 2009. Redes de conocimineto en las trames productivas de Argentina. Programa de Investigación sobre Economía del Conocimiento en América Latina y el Caribe. México: FLACSO-México, IDRC-Canadá.
78. Yoguel, G., M. Novick, and A. Marin. 2001. Estilos de vinculación, procesos de innovación y tecnologías de gestión social en una trama productiva del complejo automotriz argentino. Revista Redes 8, no. 17: 6-35.
79. Zahra, S., and G. George. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27, no. 2: 185-203.