Technological knowledge as an essential facility

Journal of Evolutionary Economics

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 451-471

  Antonelli, Cristiano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Compensatory liability regime; Essential facility; Intellectual property right regimes; Knowledge governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547381531     PISSN: 09369937     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00191-007-0058-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Antonelli C (2001) The microeconomics of technological systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford
2. Antonelli C (2003) The economics of innovation, new technologies and structural change. Routledge, London
3. Antonelli C (2005) Models of knowledge and systems of governance. Journal of Institutional Economics 1:51-73
4. Antonelli C (2006) The governance of localized knowledge. An information economics approach to the economics of knowledge. Ind Innov 13:227-261
5. Antonelli C (2008) The path dependent complexity of localized technological change: ingredients, governance and processes. Routledge, London, forthcoming
6. Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A (2001) Markets for technology. MIT, Cambridge
7. Arrow KJ (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson RR (ed) The rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors. Princeton University Press for N.B.E.R., Princeton, pp 609-625
8. Arundel A (2001) The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Res Policy 30:611-624
9. Barton J (2000) Reforming the patent system. Science 287:1933-1934
10. Baumol WJ, Sydak JG (1994) Toward competition in local telephony. MIT, Cambridge
11. Boldrin M, Levine DK (2002) The case against intellectual property rights. Am Econ Rev 92:209-212
12. Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not), NBER, Cambridge
13. David PA (1993) Knowledge property and the system dynamics of technological change. Proceedings of the world bank annual conference on development economics. The World Bank, Washington
14. Davis L (2004) Intellectual property rights, strategy and policy. Econ Innov New Technol 13:399-416
15. Fransman M (2002) Telecoms in the Internet age: from to boom to bust to ....? Oxford University Press, Oxford
16. Hall B, Graham SJH, Harhoff D, Mowery DC (2003) Prospects for improving U.S Patent quality via postgrant opposition, Paper prepared for the NBER Conference in Innovation Policy and the Economy, Washington, DC
17. Jaffe AB, Lerner J (2004) Innovation and its discontent: how our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress and what can be done about it. Princeton University Press, Princeton
18. Kingston W (2001) Innovation needs patents reforms. Res Policy 30:403-423
19. Lessig L (1999) Code and other laws of cyberspace, Basic Books, New York
20. Machlup F, Penrose E (1950) The patent controversy in the nineteenth century. J Econ Hist 10:1-20
21. Madden G. (ed) (2003) Handbook on telecommunications. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
22. McDonald S (2004) What means become ends: considering the impact of patent strategy on innovation. Inf Econ Policy 16:135-158
23. Mokyr J (2002) The gifts of Athena: historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
24. Nelson RR (2004) The market economy and the scientific commons. Res Policy 33:455-471
25. Raymond ES (1999) The cathedral and the bazaar: musing on Linux and Open Source by accidental revolutionary. O'Reilly, Sebastopol
26. Reichman J (2000) Of green tulips and legal kudzu': Repackaging rights in subpalentable invention, Vanderbilt Law Rev 53:17-43. Reprinted in Dreyfuss R, Zimmerman D (eds) Expanding the boundaries of intellectual property. Oxford University Press (2001) Oxford, pp 23-54
27. Reichman J, Maskus K (eds) (2005) International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
28. Reitzig M (2004) The private value of 'thickets' and 'fences'. Econ Innov New Technol 13:443-456
29. Samuelson P, Davis R, Kapor MD, Reichman JH (1994) A manifesto concerning the legal protection of computer programs. Columbia Law Rev 94:2308-2365
30. Shavell S, Van Ypersele T (2001) Rewards versus intellectual property rights. Journal of Law and Economics 44:525-547
31. Stallman RM (1998) The GNU project. O'Reilly, Sebastopol
32. Stiglitz J (2000) The contributions of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Q J Econ 115:1441-1478
33. Stiglitz JE (2002) Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. Am Econ Rev 92:460-502
34. Swann GMP (2006) Is the world flat or round? Mapping changes in the taste for art. In: Antonelli C et al. (eds) New frontiers in the economics of innovation and new technology, Essays in Honor of Paul David. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham