Technology push-over: Defense downturns and civilian technology policy

Research Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 937-951

  Klein, Hans ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Civilian technology policy; Intelligent transportation systems (ITS); Iron triangles; Technology policy; Technology push

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035368741     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00166-9     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adams, G., 1984. The Politics of Defense Contracting: The Iron Triangle. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ.
2. Alic J. The dual use of technology: concepts and policies. Technology in Society. 16:1994;155-172.
3. Branscomb, L. (Ed.). 1993. Empowering Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Bright, C., 1978. The Jet Makers: The Aerospace Industry from 1945 to 1972. Regents Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
5. Burke, C., 1979. Innovation and Public Policy: The Case of Personal Rapid Transit. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
6. CALSTART, 1999. DARPA Consortia EV and Hybrid EV Technology Projects. Viewed at http://calstart.org .
7. Cohen, L., Noll, R., 1991. The Technology Pork Barrel. Brookings, Washington, DC.
8. DOT (Department of Transportation). 2000. In: Proceedings of the Federal Report to the ITS America Board of Directors Meeting, 8 September 2000. Viewed at: www.its.dot.gov/ccreports/fedrpt.html .
9. Eads G. US Government support for civilian technology: economic theory versus political practice. Research Policy. 3:1974;2-16.
10. Ergas, H., 1987. Does technology policy matter? In: Technology and Global Industry: Companies and Nations in the World Economy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
11. FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1994. Implementation of the National Intelligent Transportation Systems Program: A Report to Congress.
12. GPO (Government Printing Office). 1969. Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations for 1969, hearings before a subcommittee on appropriations, House of Representatives. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p. 384.
13. GPO (Government Printing Office). 1970. Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations for 1969, hearings before a subcommittee on appropriations, House of Representatives. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p. 1147.
14. GPO (Government Printing Office). 1971. Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations for 1969, hearings before a subcommittee on appropriations, House of Representatives. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p. 241.
15. Hamilton, W.F., 1970. Alternative paths to guideway transportation. In: Brand, D. (Ed.), Urban Transportation Innovation. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 398.
16. Hill, C., 1998. The advanced technology program: opportunities for enhancement. In: Investing in Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Holman, M., Suranyi-Unger, T., 1981. The political economy of American astronautics. In: American Astronautical Society History Series 3, Between sputnik and the shuttle: new perspectives on American astronautics. Univelt, San Diego, 167.
18. IEEE, 1970. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology VT-19.
19. IVHS America, 1992. Strategic Plan for Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems in the United States. IVHS America, Washington, DC.
20. Klein, H., 1996. Operation Timesaver: a political and institutional analysis. In: Proceedings of the ITS World Congress, ITS America, Washington, DC.
21. Klein H. system development in the federal government: how technology influences outcomes. Policy Studies Journal. 28:2000;313-328.
22. Lambright, H.,1976. Governing Science and Technology. Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Logsdon, J.M., 1970. The Decision to Go to the Moon: Project Apollo and the National Interest. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. Mackenzie's, D., 1990. Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. McNaugher, T., 1989. New Weapons Old Politics: America's Procurement Muddle. Brookings, Washington, DC.
26. Morone, J., Woodhouse, E., 1989. The Demise of Nuclear Energy? Lessons for Democratic Control of Technology. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
27. Mowery, D., Rosenberg, N., 1991. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press, New York.
28. Myers, S., 1979. In: Altshuler (Ed.), Public policy and transportation innovation: the role of demonstration.
29. NAHSC (National Automated Highway Systems Consortium). 1998. Viewed at nahsc.volpe.dot.gov .
30. Nelson, R. (Ed.). 1982. Government and Technical Progress: A Cross-industry Analysis. Pergamon Press, London.
31. NIST (National Institute for Standards and Technology), 1999. Viewed at jazz.nist.gov/atpcf/prjbriefs/listresults.cfm .
32. NSF (National Science Foundation), 1999. Federal Funds Survey, Detailed Historical Tables, fiscal years 1951-1999. Document nsf99347, 8 June. Available at www.nsf.gov.
33. NSF (National Science Foundation), 1997. National Patterns of R&D Resources. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
34. NSF (National Science Foundation), 1996. Science and Engineering Indicators 1996. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
35. NSF (National Science Foundation), 1993. Science and Engineering Indicators 1993. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
36. Rosenbloom J. the politics of the American SST programme: origin, opposition, and termination. Social Studies of Science. 11:1981;403-423.
37. Sapolsky, H., 1972. The Polaris System Development: Bureaucratic and Programmatic Success in Government. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. Saxton, L., 1993. Mobility 2000 and the roots of IVHS. IVHS Review, Spring.
39. Shladover, S., Bushey, R., Parsons, R., 1993. California and the roots of IVHS. IVHS Review, Spring.
40. Shapley, D., 1971. R&D conversion: former NASA lab now working on transportation. Science 171, 22 January, pp. 268-269.
41. Thelen, K., Steinmo, S., 1992. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In: Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., Longstreth, F. (Eds.), Structuring Politics. Cambridge University Press, New York.
42. RAND, 1998. The Machine That Could: PNGV, A Government-Industry Partnership. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
43. RAND, 1976. Analysis of Federally Funded Demonstration Projects. RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
44. Wilshire, R., 1990. Intelligent Vehicle/Highway Systems-a feeling of deja vu. ITE Journal, November, pp. 39-41.