Memory-based learning models of inflectional morphology: A methodological case study

Lingue e Linguaggio

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 151-174

  Keuleers, Emmanuel ^a   Daelemans, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649296076     PISSN: 17209331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1418/25649     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Albright, A. & Hayes, B. (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. «Cognition», 90(2), 119-161.
2. Baayen, R. H. (2001). Word frequency distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Baayen, R. H. & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2005). Semantic density and pasttense formation in three Germanic languages. «Language», 81, 666-698.
4. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [Distributor].
5. Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., De Jong, N., & Krott, A. (2002). Dutch Inflection: The Rules That Prove The Exception. In S. Nooteboom, F. Weerman, & F. Wijnen (eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
6. Banko, M. & Brill, E. (2001). Scaling to Very Very Large Corpora for Natural Language Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. (pp. 26-33).
7. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: H. Holt and Company.
8. Bybee, J. L. (1995). Regular Morphology and the Lexicon. «Language and Cognitive Processes», 10, 425-455.
9. Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: a multidisciplinary study of German inflection. «Behavioral and Brain Sciences», 22(6), 991-1013; discussion 1014-60.
10. Cost, S. & Salzberg, S. (1993). A Weighted Nearest Neighbor Algorithm for Learning with Symbolic Features. «Machine Learning», 10, 57-78.
11. Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A. (2003). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Daelemans, W. (2002). A Comparison of Analogical Modeling of Language to Memorybased Language Processing. In D. Skousen, R. Lonsdale, & D. Parkinson (eds.), Analogical Modeling. (pp. 157-179). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., & Durieux, G. (1994). The Acquisition of Stress: A Dataoriented Approach. «Computational Linguistics», 20, 421-451.
14. Daelemans, W. & van den Bosch, A. (2005). Memory-Based Language Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Daelemans, W., Zavrel, J., van der Sloot, K., & van den Bosch, A. (2007). TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 6.0, Reference Guide. ILK Technical Report Series, 07-05.
16. De Haas, W. & Trommelen, M. (1993). Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands. Een overzicht van de woordvorming. (Handbook of Dutch Morphology. An overview of Word Formation). 's-Gravenhage: SDU.
17. De Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne - Paris: Payot.
18. Eddington, D. (2000). Analogy and the dual-route model of morphology. «Lingua», 110, 281-289.
19. Ernestus, M. & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch. «Linguistics», 45(5), 873-903.
20. Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Fix, E. & Hodges, J. L. (1951). Discriminatory analysis. Nonparametric discrimination: consistency properties. [Technical Report]. Randolph Field, Texas: USAF School of Aviation Medicine.
22. Gillis, S., Durieux, G., & Daelemans, W. (2000). Lazy Learning: Natural and machine learning of word stress. In P. Broeder & J. Murre (eds.), Models of Language Acquisition. (pp. 76-99). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Hahn, U. & Nakisa, R. C. (2000). German Inflection: Single Route or Dual Route? «Cognitive Psychology», 41, 313-360.
24. Keuleers, E., Sandra, D., Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., Durieux, G., & Martens, E. (2007). Dutch plural inflection: The exception that proves the analogy. «Cognitive Psychology», 54(4), 283-318.
25. Krott, A., Schreuder, R., Baayen, R. H., & Dressler, W. U. (2007). Analogical effects on linking elements in German compounds. «Language and Cognitive Processes», 22(1), 25-57.
26. Krott, A., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2002). Linking elements in Dutch nounnoun compounds: constituent families as analogical predictors for response latencies. «Brain and Language», 81(1-3), 708-722.
27. Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Similarity, frequency and category representations. «Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition», 14, 54-65.
28. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and Rules. London: Phoenix.
29. Ratcliff, J. W. & Metzener, D. E. (1988). Pattern Matching: the Gestalt Approach. «Dr. Dobbs Journal», pp. 46-51.
30. Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On Learning the Past Tenses of English Verbs. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & The-PDP-Research-Group (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Vol. 2. Psychological and Biological Models. (pp. 216-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Skousen, R. (2002). An overview of analogical modeling. In R. Skousen, D. Lonsdale, & D. Parkinson (eds.), Analogical Modeling. (pp. 11-26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. van den Bosch, A. & Daelemans, W. (1999). Memory-based Morphological Analysis. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '99, 285-292.