Debriefing in Moodle: Written feedback on trust and knowledge sharing in a social dilemma game

Simulation and Gaming

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 374-389

  Oertig, Margaret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND ARTS NORTHWESTERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

business students; cross cultural; debriefing; feedback; Moodle; simulation game; social dilemma; trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649288865     PISSN: 10468781     EISSN: 1552826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046878108325982     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. de Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46(3), 249-264.
3. Dougiamas, M., & Taylor, P.C. (2003, April). Moodle: Using learning communities to create an open source course management system. Retrieved June 25, 2008, from http://dougiamas.com/writing/edmedia2003/.
4. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J.E. (2002). Games motivation, and learning. A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441-467.
5. Griffiths, T., & Guile, D. (2003). A connective model of learning: The implications for work process knowledge. European Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 56-73.
6. Hay, K.E., & Barab, S.A. (2001). Constructivism in practice: A comparison and contrast of apprenticeship and constructionist learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(3), 281-322.
7. Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Leidner, D.E. (1998). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4). Retrieved October 15, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/jarvenpaa.html.
8. Kennedy, G. (2002). Negotiation. Harlow, Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
9. Kolb, D.A., & Fry, R. (1975). Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group process (pp. 33-57). London: John Wiley.
10. Lederman, L.C. (1992). Debriefing: Towards a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simulation & Gaming, 23(2), 145-160.
11. Levin, D.Z., Cross, R., Abrams, L.C., & Lesser, E.L. (2002). Trust and knowledge sharing: A critical combination. New York: IBM Corporation. Retrieved June 25, 2008, from http:// www-1.ibm.com/services/au/index.wss/ibvstudy/igs/a1006365?cntxt=a1005069.
12. Oertig, M., & Buergi, T. (2006). The challenges of managing cross-cultural virtual project teams. Team Performance Management, 12(1-2), 23-30.
13. Peters, V., & Vissers, G. (2004). A simple classification model for debriefing simulation games. Simulation & Gaming, 35(1), 70-84.
14. Petranek, C.F. (2000). Written debriefing: The next vital step in learning with simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 31(1), 108-118.
15. Steinwachs, B. (1992). How to facilitate a debriefing. Simulation & Gaming, 23(2), 186-195.
16. Thompson, L. (2005). The mind and the heart of the negotiator. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.