Osteopontin presentation affects cell adhesion-Influence of underlying surface chemistry and nanopatterning of osteopontin

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 95 A, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 518-530

  Malmström, Jenny ^a   Christensen, Brian ^a   Lovmand, Jette ^a   Sørensen, Esben S ^a   Duch, Mogens ^a   Sutherland, Duncan S ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

cell adhesion; colloidal lithography; Osteopontin; protein nanopattern; self assembled monolayers

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE PATCHES; CELL ATTACHMENTS; COATING MATERIAL; COLLOIDAL LITHOGRAPHY; ELECTROSTATIC ATTRACTIONS; FUNCTIONAL FORMS; HYDROPHILIC SURFACES; HYDROPHOBIC SURFACES; MINERALIZED TISSUE; NANO PATTERN; NANOPATTERNING; OSTEOPONTIN; POSITIVELY CHARGED; SPECIFIC INTERACTION; UNDERLYING SURFACE;

ADHESION; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; CAPILLARITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL MEMBRANES; COATINGS; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; PROTEINS; SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYERS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

SURFACES;

GOLD; OSTEOPONTIN;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CELL CULTURE; CELL ADHESION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY;

ADSORPTION; AMINES; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELLS, CULTURED; GOLD; HUMANS; IONS; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSTEOPONTIN; PARTICLE SIZE; STATIC ELECTRICITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 78649275818     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32879     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI, Pearcy MJ,. Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: A review. Tissue Eng 2005; 11: 1-18.
2. Geiger B, Bershadsky A, Pankov R, Yamada KM,. Transmembrane extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton crosstalk. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001; 2: 793-805.
3. Denhardt DT, Guo XJ,. Osteopontin-A protein with diverse functions. FASEB J 1993; 7: 1475-1482.
4. Lee YJ, Park SJ, Lee WK, Ko JS, Kim HM,. MG63 osteoblastic cell adhesion to the hydrophobic surface precoated with recombinant osteopontin fragments. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 1059-1066.
5. Liu LY, Chen SF, Giachelli CM, Ratner BD, Jiang SY,. Controlling osteopontin orientation on surfaces to modulate endothelial cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 74: 23-31.
6. Sodek J, Ganss B, McKee MD,. Osteopontin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2000; 11: 279-303.
7. Denhardt DT, Giachelli CM, Rittling SR,. Role of osteopontin in cellular signaling and toxicant injury. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 2001; 41: 723-749.
8. Kazanecki CC, Uzwiak DJ, Denhardt DT,. Control of osteopontin signaling and function by post-translational phosphorylation and protein folding. J Cell Biochem 2007; 102: 912-924.
9. Christensen B, Kazanecki CC, Petersen TE, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT, Sorensen ES,. Cell type-specific post-translational modifications of mouse osteopontin are associated with different adhesive properties. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 19463-19472.
10. Christensen B, Nielsen MS, Haselmann KF, Petersen TE, Sorensen ES,. Post-translationally modified residues of native human osteopontin are located in clusters: identification of 36 phosphorylation and five O-glycosylation sites and their biological implications. Biochem J 2005; 390: 285-292.
11. Sorensen ES, Hojrup P, Petersen TE,. Posttranslational Modifications of Bovine Osteopontin-Identification of 28 Phosphorylation and 3 O-Glycosylation Sites. Protein Sci 1995; 4: 2040-2049.
12. Christensen B, Petersen TE, Sorensen ES,. Post-translational modification and proteolytic processing of urinary osteopontin. Biochem J 2008; 411: 53-61.
13. Keykhosravani M, Doherty-Kirby A, Zhang CJ, Brewer D, Goldberg HA, Hunter GK, Lajoie G,. Comprehensive identification of post-translational modifications of rat bone osteopontin by mass spectrometry. Biochemistry 2005; 44: 6990-7003.
14. Ekrylander B, Flores M, Wendel M, Heinegard D, Andersson G,. Dephosphorylation of osteopontin and bone sialoprotein by osteoclastic tartrate-resistant acid-phosphatase-Modulation of osteoclast adhesion in-vitro. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 14853-14856.
15. Al-Shami R, Sorensen ES, Ek-Rylander B, Andersson G, Carson DD, Farach-Carson MC,. Phosphorylated osteopontin promotes migration of human choriocarcinoma cells via a p70 S6 kinase-dependent pathway. J Cell Biochem 2005; 94: 1218-1233.
16. Katayama Y, House CM, Udagawa N, Kazama JJ, McFarland RJ, Martin TJ, Findlay DM,. Casein kinase 2 phosphorylation of recombinant rat osteopontin enhances adhesion of osteoclasts but not osteoblasts. J Cell Physiol 1998; 176: 179-187.
17. Razzouk S, Brunn JC, Qin C, Tye CE, Goldberg HA, Butler WT,. Osteopontin posttranslational modifications, possibly phosphorylation, are required for in vitro bone resorption but not osteoclast adhesion. Bone 2002; 30: 40-47.
18. Ashkar S, Weber GF, Panoutsakopoulou V, Sanchirico ME, Jansson M, Zawaideh S, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT, Glimcher MJ, Cantor H,. Eta-1 (osteopontin): An early component of type-1 (cell-mediated) immunity. Science 2000; 287: 860-864.
19. Weber GF, Zawaideh S, Hikita S, Kumar VA, Cantor H, Ashkar S,. Phosphorylation-dependent interaction of osteopontin with its receptors regulates macrophage migration and activation. J Leukocyte Biol 2002; 72: 752-761.
20. Yurchenco PD, Cheng YS, Campbell K, Li SH,. Loss of basement membrane, receptor and cytoskeletal lattices in a laminin-deficient muscular dystrophy. J Cell Sci 2004; 117: 735-742.
21. Arnold M, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Glass R, Blummel J, Eck W, Kantlehner M, Kessler H, Spatz JP,. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. Chemphyschem 2004; 5: 383-388.
22. Yim EKF, Reano RM, Pang SW, Yee AF, Chen CS, Leong KW,. Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 5405-5413.
23. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Sutherland DS, Agheli H, Curtis ASG,. Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithography. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 5415-5422. (Pubitemid 38586756)
24. Rice JM, Hunt JA, Gallagher JA, Hanarp P, Sutherland DS, Gold J,. Quantitative assessment of the response of primary derived human osteoblasts and macrophages to a range of nanotopography surfaces in a single culture model in vitro. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4799-4818.
25. Andersson AS, Brink J, Lidberg U, Sutherland DS,. Influence of systematically varied nanoscale topography on the morphology of epithelial cells. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 2003; 2: 49-57.
26. Lim JY, Donahue HJ,. Cell sensing and response to micro- and nanostructured surfaces produced by chemical and topographic patterning. Tissue Eng 2007; 13: 1879-1891.
27. Agheli H, Malmstrom J, Larsson EM, Textor M, Sutherland DS,. Large area protein nanopatterning for biological applications. Nano Lett 2006; 6: 1165-1171.
28. Slater JH, Frey W,. Nanopatterning of fibronectin and the influence of integrin clustering on endothelial cell spreading and proliferation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 87: 176-195.
29. Wolfram T, Spatz JP, Burgess RW,. Cell adhesion to agrin presented as a nanopatterned substrate is consistent with an interaction with the extracellular matrix and not transmembrane adhesion molecules. BMC Cell Biol 2008; 9: 64.
30. Lehnert D, Wehrle-Haller B, David C, Weiland U, Ballestrem C, Imhof BA, Bastmeyer M,. Cell behaviour on micropatterned substrata: limits of extracellular matrix geometry for spreading and adhesion. J Cell Sci 2004; 117: 41-52.
31. Malmström J, Christensen B, Jakobsen HP, Lovmand J, Foldbjerg R, Sorensen ES, Sutherland DS,. Large area protein patterning reveals nanoscale control of focal adhesion development. Nano Lett 2010; 10: 686-694.
32. Ross DT, Scherf U, Eisen MB, Perou CM, Rees C, Spellman P, Iyer V, Jeffrey SS, Van de Rijn M, Waltham M, and others. Systematic variation in gene expression patterns in human cancer cell lines. Nat Genet 2000; 24: 227-235.
33. Xuan JW, Hota C, Shigeyama Y, Derrico JA, Somerman MJ, Chambers AF,. Site-directed mutagenesis of the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid sequence in osteopontin destroys cell-adhesion and migration functions. J Cell Biochem 1995; 57: 680-690.
34. Sorensen ES, Petersen TE,. Purification and characterization of 3 proteins isolated from the proteose peptone fraction of bovine-milk. J Dairy Res 1993; 60: 189-197.
35. Krozer A, Rodahl M,. X-ray photoemission spectroscopy study of UV/ozone oxidation of Au under ultrahigh vacuum conditions. J Vac Sci Technol A 1997; 15: 1704-1709.
36. Fredriksson H, Alaverdyan Y, Dmitriev A, Langhammer C, Sutherland DS, Zaech M, Kasemo B,. Hole-mask colloidal lithography. Adv Mater 2007; 19: 4297.
37. Lovmand J, Justesen E, Foss M, Lauridsen RH, Lovmand M, Modin C, Besenbacher F, Pedersen FS, Duch M,. The use of combinatorial topographical libraries for the screening of enhanced osteogenic expression and mineralization. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 2015-2022.
38. Malmström J, Shipovskov S, Christensen B, Sørensen E, Kingshott P, Sutherland DS,. Adsorption and enzymatic cleavage of osteopontin at interfaces with different surface chemistries. Biointerphases 2009; 4: 47-55.
39. Kenausis GL, Voros J, Elbert DL, Huang NP, Hofer R, Ruiz-Taylor L, Textor M, Hubbell JA, Spencer ND,. Poly(L-lysine)-g-poly(ethylene glycol) layers on metal oxide surfaces: Attachment mechanism and effects of polymer architecture on resistance to protein adsorption. J Phys Chem B 2000; 104: 3298-3309.
40. Lee MH, Brass DA, Morris R, Composto RJ, Ducheyne P,. The effect of non-specific interactions on cellular adhesion using model surfaces. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 1721-1730.
41. Lee MH, Ducheyne P, Lynch L, Boettiger D, Composto RJ,. Effect of biomaterial surface properties on fibronectin-alpha(5)beta(1) integrin interaction and cellular attachment. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 1907-1916.
42. Qiu Q, Sayer M, Kawaja M, Shen X, Davies JE,. Attachment, morphology, and protein expression of rat marrow stromal cells cultured on charged substrate surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 1998; 42: 117-127.
43. Shelton RM, Rasmussen AC, Davies JE,. Protein Adsorption at the interface between charged polymer substrata and migrating osteoblasts. Biomaterials 1988; 9: 24-29.
44. Nakanishi K, Sakiyama T, Imamura K,. On the adsorption of proteins on solid surfaces, a common but very complicated phenomenon. J Biosci Bioeng 2001; 91: 233-244.
45. Fisher LW, Torchia DA, Fohr B, Young MF, Fedarko NS,. Flexible structures of SIBLING proteins, bone sialoprotein, and osteopontin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 280: 460-465.
46. Gericke A, Qin C, Spevak L, Fujimoto Y, Butler WT, Sorensen ES, Boskey AL,. Importance of phosphorylation for osteopontin regulation of biomineralization. Calcif Tissue Int 2005; 77: 45-54.
47. Malmstrom J, Agheli H, Kingshott P, Sutherland DS,. Viscoelastic modeling of highly hydrated laminin layers at homogeneous and nanostructured surfaces: Quantification of protein layer properties using QCM-D and SPR. Langmuir 2007; 23: 9760-9768.
48. Agheli H, Malmstrom J, Hanarp P, Sutherland DS,. Nanostructured biointerfaces. Mater Sci Eng C-Biomimetic Supramol Syst 2006; 26: 911-917.
49. Massia SP, Hubbell JA,. An Rgd spacing of 440nm is sufficient for integrin alpha-v-beta-3-mediated fibroblast spreading and 140nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation. J Cell Biol 1991; 114: 1089-1100.
50. Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Volberg T, Micoulet A, Kessler H, Geiger B, Spatz JP,. Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. Biophys J 2007; 92: 2964-2974.
51. Berry CC, Curtis ASG, Oreffo ROC, Agheli H, Sutherland DS,. Human fibroblast and human bone marrow cell response to lithographically nanopatterned adhesive domains on protein rejecting substrates. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 2007; 6: 201-209.
52. Goodwin AE, Pauli BU,. A new adhesion assay using buoyancy to remove nonadherent cells. J Immunol Meth 1995; 187: 213-219.