Tokens of trust or token trust?: Public consultation and 'generation Scotland'

Researching Trust and Health

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 152-173

  Haddow, Gill ^a   Cunningham Burley, Sarah ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b Centre for Research on Families and Relationships (CRFR)   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649307734     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203928271     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
2. Beck, U. 1997. The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.
3. Brownlie, J., and A. Howson. (2005). 'Leaps of Faith' and MMR: An Empirical Study of Trust. Sociology 39(2): 221-239.
4. Cunningham-Burley, S. (2006). Public Knowledge and Public Trust. Community Genetics 9(3): 204-210.
5. Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.
6. Haddow, G., S. Cunningham-Burley, A. Bruce, and S. Parry. 2004. Generation Scotland Preliminary Consultation Exercise 2003-04: Public and Stakeholder Views from Focus Groups and Interviews 1-27). Edinburgh: ESRC INNOGEN Centre, the University of Edinburgh.
7. Haddow, G., G. Laurie, S. Cunningham-Burley, and K. Hunter. (2007). Tackling Community Concerns about Commercialization and Genetic Research: A Modest Interdisciplinary Proposal. Social Science and Medicine 64: 272-282.
8. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. Science and Society, 3rd Report. London HMSO 2000 [online]. Available from:
9. Irwin, A. (2006). The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the New Scientific Governance. Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299-320.
10. Jones, M., and B. Salter. (2003). The Governance of Human Genetics: Policy Discourse and Constructions of Public Trust. New Genetics and Society 22(1): 21-41.
11. Kerr, A., S. Cunningham-Burley, and A. Amos. (1998). The New Genetics and Health: Mobilizing Lay Expertise. Public Understanding of Science 7(1): 41-60.
12. Kerr, A., S. Cunningham-Burley, and R. Tutton. (2007). Shifting Subject Positions:Experts and Lay People in Public Dialogue. Social Studies of Science 37(3): 385-411.
13. Khodyakov, D. (2007). Trust as a Process: A Three-Dimensional Approach. Sociology 41(1): 115-132.
14. Lewis, D., and A. Weigert. (1985). Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces 63(4): 967-985.
15. Möllering, G. (2001). The Nature of Trust: From Georg Simmel to a Theory of Expectation, Interpretation and Suspension. Sociology 35(2): 403-420.
16. Rose, H. 2001. The Commodification of Bioinformation: The Icelandic Health Sector Database. London: The Wellcome Trust.
17. Willis, R., and J. Wilsdon. 2004. See Through Science. Demos, London.
18. Wynne, B. 1996. May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Divide, in Risk, Environment and Modernity, eds. S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne (44-83). London: Sage.
19. Wynne, B. (2006). Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science-Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music. Community Genetics 9: 211-220.