Value creation, competition, and performance in buyer-supplier relationships

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 76-102

  Chatain, Olivier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

added value; buyer supplier relationships; client specific scope economies; professional service firms; value based strategies

Indexed keywords

ADDED VALUES; BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS; PROFESSIONAL SERVICES; SCOPE ECONOMIES; VALUE-BASED;

COMMERCE; PROFITABILITY; SALES; STATISTICAL TESTS;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 78649269555     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.864     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adegbesan JA, Higgins MJ,. 2009. The intra-alliance division of value created through collaboration. IESE Business School Working paper no. 667. University of Navarra, Barcelona, Spain.
2. Adner R, Zemsky P,. 2006. A demand-based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 27 (3): 215-239.
3. Anand BN, Galetovic A,. 2006. Relationships, competition and the structure of investment banking markets. Journal of Industrial Economics 54 (2): 151-199.
4. Baker WE,. 1990. Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology 96 (3): 589-625.
5. Barney JB,. 1986. Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science 32 (10): 1231-1241.
6. Blyler M, Coff R,. 2003. Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal 24 (7): 677-686.
7. Brandenburger AM, Stuart HW,. 1996. Value-based business strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 5 (1): 5-24.
8. Brandenburger A, Stuart HW,. 2007. Biform games. Management Science 53 (4): 537-549.
9. Burt RS,. 1992. Structural Holes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
10. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK,. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge,UK.
11. Chatain O, Zemsky P,. 2007. The horizontal scope of the firm: organizational tradeoffs vs. buyer-supplier relationships. Management Science 53 (4): 550-565.
12. Chatain O, Zemsky P,. 2009. Value creation and value capture with frictions. INSEAD Working paper no. 2009/35/ST/ACGRE. INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.
13. Coff RW,. 1999. When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: the resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science 10 (2): 119-133.
14. Dyer JH, Singh H,. 1998. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23 (4): 660-679.
15. Ethiraj SK, Kale P, Krishnan MS, Singh JV,. 2005. Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management Journal 26 (1): 25-45.
16. Froot KA,. 1989. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with cross-sectional dependence and heteroskedasticity in financial data. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 24: 333-355.
17. Gilson RJ, Mnookin RH,. 1989. Coming of age in a corporate law firm: the economics of associate career patterns. Stanford Law Review 41: 567-595.
18. Gimeno J, Woo CY,. 1996a. Economic multiplexity: the structural embeddedness of cooperation in multiple relations of interdependence. Advances in Strategic Management 13: 323-261.
19. Gimeno J, Woo CY,. 1996b. Hypercompetition in a multimarket environment: the role of strategic similarity and multimarket contact in competitive de-escalation. Organization Science 7 (3): 322-341.
20. Hausman J,. 2001. Mismeasured variables in econometric analysis: problems from the right and problems from the left. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (4): 57-68.
21. Helfat CE,. 1997. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: the case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal 18 (5): 339-360.
22. Henderson R, Cockburn I,. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 15: 63-84.
23. Henderson WD,. 2006. An empirical study of single-tier versus two-tier partnership in the Am Law 200. North Carolina Law Review 84 (5): 1691-1750.
24. King G, Zeng L,. 2001. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis 9 (2): 137-163.
25. Klemperer P,. 1992. Equilibrium product lines: competing head-to-head may be less competitive. American Economic Review 82 (4): 740-755.
26. Kor YY, Leblebici H,. 2005. How do interdependencies among human-capital deployment, development, and diversification strategies affect firms' financial performance? Strategic Management Journal 26 (10): 967-985.
27. Levinthal DA,. 2008. The scientific value of game theory. (DRUID Conference Debate, 20 June), DRUID conference, Copenhagen, Denmark. accessed 14 November 2008.
28. Levinthal DA, Fichman M,. 1988. Dynamics of interorganizational attachments: auditor-client relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 33 (3): 345-369.
29. Lippman SA, Rumelt RP,. 2003. A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management Journal 24 (11): 1069-1086.
30. MacDonald G, Ryall MD,. 2004. How do value creation and competition determine whether a firm appropriates value? Management Science 50 (10): 1319-1333.
31. Maister DH,. 1993. Managing the Professional Service Firm. Free Press: New York.
32. Martin X, Swaminathan A, Mitchell W,. 1998. Organizational evolution in the interorganizational environment: incentives and constraints on international expansion strategy. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (3): 566-601.
33. Meyer BD,. 1990. Unemployment insurance and unemployment spells. Econometrica 58 (4): 757-782.
34. Miller D, Shamsie J,. 1996. The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: the Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal 39 (3): 519-543.
35. Mitchell W, Singh K,. 1996. Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic Management Journal 17 (3): 169-195.
36. Müller HM, Wärneryd K,. 2001. Inside versus outside ownership: a political theory of the firm. Rand Journal of Economics 32 (3): 527-541.
37. Myerson RB,. 1991. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
38. Panzar JC, Willig RD,. 1981. Economies of scope. American Economic Review 71 (2):): 268-272.
39. Peteraf MA, Barney JB,. 2003. Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics 24 (4): 309-323.
40. Piskorski MJ, Casciaro T,. 2006. When more power makes actors worse off: turning a profit in the American economy. Social Forces 85 (2): 1011-1036.
41. Porter ME,. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press: New York.
42. Rogers WH,. 1993. Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin 13: 19-23.
43. Ryall MD, Sorenson O,. 2007. Brokers and competitive advantage. Management Science 53 (4): 566-583.
44. Samuelson SS, Jaffe LJ,. 1990. A statistical analysis of law firm profitability. Boston University Law Review 70: 185-211.
45. Siggelkow N,. 2003. Why focus? A study of intra-industry focus effects. Journal of Industrial Economics 51 (2): 121-150.
46. Simmel G,. 1950. The triad. In The Sociology of Georg Simmel, Wolff KH, (ed., trans.). Free Press: New York; 145-168.
47. Stuart HW,. 2004. Efficient spatial competition. Games and Economic Behavior 49: 345-362.
48. Teece DJ,. 1980. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1 (3): 223-247.
49. White H,. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48: 817-830.